Bump.
To Eric Fagnan: Questions about the Paladin class
Débuté par
Serge_THE_GREAT
, juil. 18 2012 07:13
Retour en haut
#78
Posté 30 octobre 2012 - 10:39
Gearsofwarowns
-
- Members
- 174 messages
This seriously needs to get answered. I think everyone who plays a Paladin needs these answers for an effective build.
#80
Posté 04 novembre 2012 - 11:02
GuardianJosh
-
- Members
- 272 messages
Thrust. I also would like answers. A stat boost would also be nice. I tried this guy out for a couple of matches but didn't like him very much. And is it just me or is he shorter than other human classes?
#81
Posté 05 novembre 2012 - 12:59
Lazmarr
-
- Members
- 12 messages
I too would also like answers to some of the questions, mainly the shields hitbox. However they did make the class much more playable by making it so that you can set off tech combos and explosions without killing the target.
#82
Posté 05 novembre 2012 - 02:09
Constant Motion
-
- Members
- 987 messages
With respect - maybe the reason Eric Fagnan (or whoever!) hasn't responded is precisely because you've bombarded him with at least eighteen questions (including subquestions), and then constantly pumped the thread up because he hasn't chosen to tackle your relatively large ask?
Because it's not like you're just asking a for little bit of trivia, there are exam papers out there with fewer questions than this. It might look kind of cheeky. Good that you're enthusiastic, good that you're interested, good that your interest's clearly not waning, and if you're all bumping purely because it makes it slightly more plausible that he might, eventually, answer it in his own time, that's great, fine, fantastic. But as an outsider... that's not really what it always looks like, and the team don't owe you one answer, let alone eighteen.
They're good questions, interesting questions, and yes, it'd be nice to hear official word on them. It'd be hell of a guide if the developers were able to write it, but I'm not sure a massive wall of quite technical questions, belligerently and repeatedly bumped is the best way to get the developers on side. As I said, I'm glad you're all so passionate, and there are some cracking questions in that OP. But if they do choose to respond, I reckon that'd be a gift, not a right. I don't think for a second that all of you are demanding answers, but has anyone considered presenting it in a different way, perhaps?
Because it's not like you're just asking a for little bit of trivia, there are exam papers out there with fewer questions than this. It might look kind of cheeky. Good that you're enthusiastic, good that you're interested, good that your interest's clearly not waning, and if you're all bumping purely because it makes it slightly more plausible that he might, eventually, answer it in his own time, that's great, fine, fantastic. But as an outsider... that's not really what it always looks like, and the team don't owe you one answer, let alone eighteen.
They're good questions, interesting questions, and yes, it'd be nice to hear official word on them. It'd be hell of a guide if the developers were able to write it, but I'm not sure a massive wall of quite technical questions, belligerently and repeatedly bumped is the best way to get the developers on side. As I said, I'm glad you're all so passionate, and there are some cracking questions in that OP. But if they do choose to respond, I reckon that'd be a gift, not a right. I don't think for a second that all of you are demanding answers, but has anyone considered presenting it in a different way, perhaps?
Modifié par Constant Motion, 05 novembre 2012 - 02:17 .
#83
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 10:31
Eurhetemec
-
- Members
- 815 messages
Constant Motion wrote...
With respect - maybe the reason Eric Fagnan (or whoever!) hasn't responded is precisely because you've bombarded him with at least eighteen questions (including subquestions), and then constantly pumped the thread up because he hasn't chosen to tackle your relatively large ask?
Because it's not like you're just asking a for little bit of trivia, there are exam papers out there with fewer questions than this. It might look kind of cheeky. Good that you're enthusiastic, good that you're interested, good that your interest's clearly not waning, and if you're all bumping purely because it makes it slightly more plausible that he might, eventually, answer it in his own time, that's great, fine, fantastic. But as an outsider... that's not really what it always looks like, and the team don't owe you one answer, let alone eighteen.
They're good questions, interesting questions, and yes, it'd be nice to hear official word on them. It'd be hell of a guide if the developers were able to write it, but I'm not sure a massive wall of quite technical questions, belligerently and repeatedly bumped is the best way to get the developers on side. As I said, I'm glad you're all so passionate, and there are some cracking questions in that OP. But if they do choose to respond, I reckon that'd be a gift, not a right. I don't think for a second that all of you are demanding answers, but has anyone considered presenting it in a different way, perhaps?
The presentation seems fine. If you're seeing a problem with it, and seeing an alternative, perhaps you could explain it?
There are a lot of questions, but they are larely short, simple questions that could be answered in a single word or sentence. It would be very nice to see them answered, too.
As a side note, dude, there are exams with ONE question on them, but where that question requires a multi-page answer in a very specific and complex format, so the number is not really relevant, is it? If an exam had 18 questions on that were all one-word or one-sentence answers, it'd be considered extremely simple - more of a brief quiz. It's kind of rude of you to suggest that this is in any way unreasonable.
Modifié par Eurhetemec, 07 novembre 2012 - 10:32 .
