jetfire118 wrote...
Because thats how it is these days. Second game comes out and its called ****.. and continue to ride on the first game... Then when the third game comes out. Everyone calls that one **** and hop on the second game... Thus forgetting all the hate they had toward the second game MAGICALLY Yea BIO isn't the only one who uses ****ing magic.
jetfire118 wrote...
Because thats how it is these days. Second game comes out and its called ****.. and continue to ride on the first game... Then when the third game comes out. Everyone calls that one **** and hop on the second game... Thus forgetting all the hate they had toward the second game MAGICALLY Yea BIO isn't the only one who uses ****ing magic.
Kunari801 wrote...
jetfire118 wrote...
Because thats how it is these days. Second game comes out and its called ****.. and continue to ride on the first game... Then when the third game comes out. Everyone calls that one **** and hop on the second game... Thus forgetting all the hate they had toward the second game MAGICALLY Yea BIO isn't the only one who uses ****ing magic.
Not really, I loved ME1 and ME2. Sure I was one of the few who liked the Mako and missed it in ME2.
F4H bandicoot wrote...
But the flaws are not present on a larger scale...
Xemnas07 wrote...
F4H bandicoot wrote...
But the flaws are not present on a larger scale...
All ME1 chars shelved, a main plot that had NOTHING to do with me1 no choices from ME1 carry over, no rpg aspects besides dialogue choices, and half the game is loyalty missions that have nothing to do with the main plot of the entire trilogy..... much larger scale it would seem
KotorEffect3 wrote...
jetfire118 wrote...
Because thats how it is these days. Second game comes out and its called ****.. and continue to ride on the first game... Then when the third game comes out. Everyone calls that one **** and hop on the second game... Thus forgetting all the hate they had toward the second game MAGICALLY Yea BIO isn't the only one who uses ****ing magic.
I wonder if there is a name for the hate the new game until it becomes the old game phenomenom
The Spamming Troll wrote...
RukiaKuchki wrote...
It's a little ironic that people are singing praise for ME2 when it was crucified on the BSN when it was released for being too different to ME1, certainly in terms of game play. Mass Effect had to evolve - what's the point in re-hashing the same game? Bioware would have received immense criticism for this.
really, bro? you never played CoD or madden before?
give me ME1s story with ME2s sidequests, with ME3s combat(but keep the overheat mechanic for weapons!), add dialogue interupts....and thats about it.
Kratos has been doing a dive roll for years. Haven't heard a single complaint.ADDING A DIVE ROLL DOES NOT MAKE IT A GENERIC SHOOTER!! THERE IS A REASON IT IS A SUCCESSFUL GAMEPLAY MECHANIC!! The roll simply makes for better and more exhilirating combat.
Quality =/= Quantity. Super Metroid can take all of 2 hours, I believe? Fallout 1/2/3 can be beaten rather quickly too. Technically, I was once able to beat Fallout 3 below 2 hours.The last complaint is that ME3 was too short; about 25 hrs on insanity and completionist playthrough. ME2 was 30 hours as the same, and HALF the game dealt with loyalty missions which had NOTHING to do with the main story.
Maelon's Data, and essentially everyone who lived/died had the greater effects on the game. Some of the replacement characters likeAnother huge complaint was that your choices from ME2 (Collector base choice, rachni, etc.) had little to no impact in ME3...... What?
Wait... fans overreacting? Really.In my opinion, people are letting their feelings for the endings affect how they feel about the rest of the game, causing them to ignore that ME2 had many of the same flaws, yet everyone praises ME2.
People praise ME2 now? I swear, this place is bonkers. Doesn't feel that long since people were fighting over mainstream-iness.Modifié par DominusVita, 19 juillet 2012 - 12:04 .
F4H bandicoot wrote...
Yes, but the plot of ME2 meant the ME1 chars had reasona to be shelved. There are more rpg aspects than in 3. Yes the plot is a problem, but ME3's plot imo is **** anyway. Choices don't really matter anyway, the rachni queen tells you she'll bugger off and your operating outside council space so why should they care??
Xemnas07 wrote...
Kunari801 wrote...
Not really, I loved ME1 and ME2. Sure I was one of the few who liked the Mako and missed it in ME2.
ok i guess this forum should be named "Why does everyone praise ME2 as a masterpiece when the flaws they claim ME3 has are all present in ME2 on a much larger scale."
cuz thats what i want to discuss, not which one you loved more, lol
Yeah, there's more of it. It was unceremoniously gutted in ME2, and most of it worked out for the better; You ended up sacrificing your weapon skills for charm and intimidation points and the like. The good news is, ME3, from a combatative standpoint, works one hell of a lot better. I think they learned from the whole evolution idea and expanded it.Me3 had deeper level customization an dmore levels, more mods, more weapons, more variables on how your archs ended depending on the first 2 games. more armor, etc etc. me2 had none of that, ie, less rpg aspects.
Kunari801 wrote...
Xemnas07 wrote...
Kunari801 wrote...
Not really, I loved ME1 and ME2. Sure I was one of the few who liked the Mako and missed it in ME2.
ok i guess this forum should be named "Why does everyone praise ME2 as a masterpiece when the flaws they claim ME3 has are all present in ME2 on a much larger scale."
cuz thats what i want to discuss, not which one you loved more, lol
I already answered that question: Emotion trumps Logic
Plus there are more issues with ME3:
-Auto-Dialog
-Very few neutral options in dialog
-Click-to-talk to crew on Normandy (Zaheed style conversations)
-Very few side missions - Just Scan-&-Fetch
-Plot Holes
-Very linear map designs
Your claim that any issues with ME3 were present in ME2 are false. Out of the list above ME2 had two of them and at less extensive than in ME3.
Now, ME3 was a "good" game and I had a ton of fun on my first Shepard, but I didn't get the replay value like I did with ME1 and ME2.
jetfire118 wrote...
you know...sometimes i think the choices from ME1 and ME2 (MAJOR) were not supposed to effect the ending for ME3...seem to me they really effected on mid game...ME2 was about trust loyalty...where ME3 is wrapping up all the conflicts and putting them aside to fight as one... That was truly ME3's theme....
F4H bandicoot wrote...
No, the entire idea of the crucible was pathetic. The rannoc and genophage aarchs are not truly pivitol to the plot, they are their own independant story.
My shepard was more like how she wanted to.be in 2. not railroaded into decisions, armour and mods is not a necessity.
Kunari801 wrote...
ME3 had much better combat mechanics than ME1 or ME2 plus the best Weapon & Armor mod system of any of the three.
It's not that ME3 was all bad.
F4H bandicoot wrote...
The crucible was stupid, the first two games were about conventionally beating the reapers, winning against the odds. The crucible is just a stilupid get out of jail free type pos.
And although they contribute, they don't revolve around the central plot. Killing reapers.
KotorEffect3 wrote...
Kunari801 wrote...
ME3 had much better combat mechanics than ME1 or ME2 plus the best Weapon & Armor mod system of any of the three.
It's not that ME3 was all bad.
Despite what people say on these forums there was more good than bad to ME 3.
Retour en haut