207 réponses à ce sujet

[Wayning_Star]

UltimateTobi wrote...

Wayning_Star wrote...

I don't hate IT, I actually enjoy the effort put forth in IT's behalf. Disagreement isn't spam, but the insistence that everyone elses game is moot because of it, isn't cool either. Especially considering that so much effort is put forth on the IT, but not on obvious game possibilites seems like some are genuinely forcing, or attempting to the indoctrination of the entire game series. Just a thought, by the way, and probably why other gamers are burning out on the IT issue dominance.

It's fine if someone disagrees. So he should come in our thread, state his reasons and tell us so.
But opening threads or just coming into the thread and saying "IT is dead.", "You nutjobs.", "You idiots." is nonsense, insulting, and not in anyway contributing.

I did that a while back, but the posts didn't last long and were ignored, not discussed, so I gave up, figured it's just the way folks there wanted their story to go, so I let up on it. The name calling is frustration. I'm not dedicated to the destruction of gamer fun either, so.. I don't argue it outside of common posts here, cause it's just not effective on the actual IT string and promotes the name calling'n such..(they had a few choice names for me over there

[JasonSic]

Start a poll. I dare you.

[PsyrenY]

They will never deny IT, because ITers need to buy the DLC and future games to support their theory with more pixels.

If you're willing to buy my **** and convince yourself it's chocolate, why should I stop you?

[Fauxnormal]

UltimateTobi wrote...

Fauxnormal wrote...

Typical ITer- lost in your own little world.

Typical hater- Doing anything but NOT leaving a comment. You don't know us, so you can't determine if it's our "world" or not.

Typical ITer.

WAH WAH WAH WAH~

[Wayning_Star]

Optimystic_X wrote...

They will never deny IT, because ITers need to buy the DLC and future games to support their theory with more pixels.

If you're willing to buy my **** and convince yourself it's chocolate, why should I stop you?

see: http://en.wikipedia....Ethical_dilemma 

[RavenEyry]

This thread isn't discussing the story or campaign. I suggest it be moved to fan creations.

[zigamortis]

Have you ever thought that there may be a legitimate reason for them not to remove it? like causing a bigger fallout than with just the regular endings, or perhaps even the fact that IT may be true.....

[shepdog77]

Poll now available in the OP.

POLL

[CoolioThane]

Jesus H Christ. Why is it people who don't see the game the way we ITers see it are so hostile towards us. Get a life.

[shepdog77]

CoolioThane wrote...

Jesus H Christ. Why is it people who don't see the game the way we ITers see it are so hostile towards us. Get a life.

I have shown no hostility towards anybody.  You, on the other hand, have been very inflammatory to me and others several times because your precious theory has come into question.  Look in the mirror pal.

[RavenEyry]

shepdog77 wrote...
I have shown no hostility towards anybody.

This thread isn't showing hostility?!?

[CoolioThane]

shepdog77 wrote...

CoolioThane wrote...

Jesus H Christ. Why is it people who don't see the game the way we ITers see it are so hostile towards us. Get a life.

I have shown no hostility towards anybody.  You, on the other hand, have been very inflammatory to me and others several times because your precious theory has come into question.  Look in the mirror pal.

haha, nice one. My precious theory has not come into question at all. You seem to think highly of yourself to think that you making this thread has, in fact, been a threat to IT. 

*sigh* I have been inflammatory to nobody. If there's even a hint of me doing so it is in your direction, and not "others"

You aren't even my pal, buddy.

[RavenEyry]

CoolioThane wrote...

You aren't even my pal, buddy.

You aren't my buddy, guy!

[shepdog77]

RavenEyry wrote...

shepdog77 wrote...
I have shown no hostility towards anybody.

This thread isn't showing hostility?!?

No, I just believe the theory should be moved to the fan creation board.  How is that hostile?

[CoolioThane]

RavenEyry wrote...

CoolioThane wrote...

You aren't even my pal, buddy.

You aren't my buddy, guy!

I thought I was    

[RavenEyry]

shepdog77 wrote...
No, I just believe the theory should be moved to the fan creation board.  How is that hostile?

You personally disagree with an interpretation show you demand it be moved from your sight. Seems pretty hostile to me.

[masster blaster]

Shepdog. You are telling us that it's fan made, but it's not Bioware already said that IT is there in the game, and they said the things that we found were on purpose. Also if you don't believe me I will show you the link that confirms this.

forum.worldofplayers.de/forum/threads/1169425-Alle-Antworten-vom-BioWare-Team-%28Livechat%29

Modifié par masster blaster, 20 juillet 2012 - 03:46 .

[CoolioThane]

shepdog77 wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

shepdog77 wrote...
I have shown no hostility towards anybody.

This thread isn't showing hostility?!?

No, I just believe the theory should be moved to the fan creation board.  How is that hostile?

hos·tile[/i]/ˈhästl/Adjective:Unfriendly; antagonistic.What was this thread if not antagonistic to everyone with a different opinion to yourself? Dictionary'd

[GethPrimeMKII]

shepdog77 wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

shepdog77 wrote...
I have shown no hostility towards anybody.

This thread isn't showing hostility?!?

No, I just believe the theory should be moved to the fan creation board.  How is that hostile?

You're belittling an interpretation accepted by Bioware themselves as a mere fan creation. Maybe if you actually read up on the damn theory you would think differently. 

[Ageless Face]

I agree OP. the IT should be moved to the fan creation board.

As soon as the literal interpretation will get there.

Who's to say what is right here? Not you, not me, not the IT crowd, not even BioWare. They left the ending is open to interpretations, and no one can say one interpretation is more right than the other one.

Maybe you should just see the ending in one way, and let others see the ending in their's?

Modifié par HagarIshay, 20 juillet 2012 - 03:52 .

[shepdog77]

CoolioThane wrote...

shepdog77 wrote...

RavenEyry wrote...

shepdog77 wrote...
I have shown no hostility towards anybody.

This thread isn't showing hostility?!?

No, I just believe the theory should be moved to the fan creation board.  How is that hostile?

hos·tile[/i]/ˈhästl/Adjective:Unfriendly; antagonistic.What was this thread if not antagonistic to everyone with a different opinion to yourself? Dictionary'd

POTATOES

[RR1107]

Not that I support or deny IT, but IT IS infact based on in-game STORY and CAMPAIGN events, so it certainly is appropriate to have it as part of the STORY AND CAMPAIGN discussion forum. As for this thread, it has NOTHING to do with the story or campaign of Mass Effect 3. If you aren't interested in the IT, don't participate in the threads that pertain to IT. Pretty simple. It's clear that the OPs only reason for starting this thread is to stir things up, since it has absolutely nothing to do with story or campaign discussion.

Modifié par RR1107, 20 juillet 2012 - 03:55 .

[CoolioThane]

shepdog77 wrote...


POTATOES

You lose.

[zigamortis]

Wayning_Star wrote...

even though I feel that the IT is all speculation derived from mis interpretation, other posters are correct to say it can remain on this board. To each their own, but have to agree with the OP as well, that the IT is a frabrication taken from the whole cloth. I don't agree with any aspect of it because it has no logical place in the game. With it there is NO game, as the whole story is moot if its based in any MEU reality. Also it undermines the reality of the MEU, as just a dream state, imposed by the idea of it. I've come to the conclusion, it's really just troll food, but that's just my take on it, in relation to how I view the entire trilogy. You cannot indoctrinate the entire game.. only one antagonist per episode... oh, and Shep isn't an antagonist.(but he IS tuned into the reapers via the Prothieans.).so..well, you get it,eh?

And for what reason exactly that shepard cannot be indoctrinated? just because he is the protagonist? thats rediculous. try playing bioshock the whole game  you are being controled without even knowing until very late game.