Modifié par Linkinator, 18 décembre 2012 - 11:08 .
Behind the monitor (Who are we MPing with? IRL photo thread)
#7026
Posté 18 décembre 2012 - 10:49
#7027
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:36
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Oh and I forgot... I got a new friend
At least one of you guys has to know what this is right?
Totoro!
(...he says, hours later. Working nights has disadvantages, I guess.)
#7028
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 05:05
V_Davion wrote...
Toxichobbit wrote...
Anything involving giant robots that turn into cars/planes and Michael Bay. Eurgh!! Awful awful films.
the first one was ok... the second one is Awful though. So awful I haven't had the courage to watch the 3rd one
I thought all three were kind of same.. except they run after 3 different things. And all of them have Shia yelling 'no no no no' like a boss ....all the time.
And here is a video I found
Shia yelling no no no like a boss!
Modifié par Mindfane, 19 décembre 2012 - 05:07 .
#7029
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 08:52
#7030
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 09:43
Derek Hollan wrote...
Johnnie Walker wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
281 pages and still going strong.
I'm impressed.
We try to keep it relevant and friendly.
All the more reason I am impressed.
Love the tatt, btw
Cheers
Hi Derek,
Nice to see Bioware like us
I would say tho that this is a photo thread forum, so if you'd like to post in here, you should really stick a photo in here too...Yno to keep it relevant
(If not of you, then of something you like at least)
Thanks,
Twink
(Behind the Monitor Moderator)
#7031
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 11:33
Oh and hey Derek, nice to see you approve of this thread
#7032
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:32
I'd say both are terrible actresses, but I think Rosie W is prettier. Megan Fox is more annoying in my book (esp as apparently she is a bit of a diva), maybe even more annoying than Keira Knightley.greghorvath wrote...
Perhaps, but she has a permanent duckface and is even worse an actress than Megan Fox.XxRY4N-RULESxX wrote...
Transformers 3 was better for that reason, I'd take Rosie Whiteley over Megan Fox anyday.
Megan Fox- T.V. eye candy, cover of a few magazines, and maxim photoshoot
Rosie Whiteley- maxim photoshoot(twice), Victoria's Secret Model, and made top five U.S. most beautiful woman
Anyway Jennifer Lawrence is the best. And I'm not just saying that cos I love her in Hunger Games. Which was great btw.
#7033
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:41
If I want good looking women, I browse through playboy or the Behind the monitor... thread. If I want good acting by a woman, I look for movies by the likes of Emma Thompson, Meryl Streep, Nicole Kidman, Naomie Watts so on and so forth.Twinkles DeVere wrote...
I'd say both are terrible actresses, but I think Rosie W is prettier. Megan Fox is more annoying in my book (esp as apparently she is a bit of a diva), maybe even more annoying than Keira Knightley.greghorvath wrote...
Perhaps, but she has a permanent duckface and is even worse an actress than Megan Fox.XxRY4N-RULESxX wrote...
Transformers 3 was better for that reason, I'd take Rosie Whiteley over Megan Fox anyday.
Megan Fox- T.V. eye candy, cover of a few magazines, and maxim photoshoot
Rosie Whiteley- maxim photoshoot(twice), Victoria's Secret Model, and made top five U.S. most beautiful woman
Anyway Jennifer Lawrence is the best. And I'm not just saying that cos I love her in Hunger Games. Which was great btw.
Megan Foxes and Rosie Whatevs as actresses... bah...
#7034
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:49
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Megan Fox is more annoying in my book (esp as apparently she is a bit of a diva), maybe even more annoying than Keira Knightley.
I 'm sure i once read an interview that Megan Fox gave where she basically said she knew she wasn't that great an actress and that she wouldn't be able to get the parts she did if it wasn't for her looks. That actually garnered her a bit of respect from me. Not a lot mind, but a bit at least. Given the immense egos of many succesful actors/actresses, actually admitting your not very good at your job and are getting by on your looks is pretty unusual. That was, however, a few years ago. She may well have changed her tune by now.
And i'm shocked that after several page of talking about good and bad films, Uwe Boll hasn't come up once.
He makes Michael Bay look good.
#7035
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:49
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
Johnnie Walker wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
281 pages and still going strong.
I'm impressed.
We try to keep it relevant and friendly.
All the more reason I am impressed.
Love the tatt, btw
Cheers
Hi Derek,
Nice to see Bioware like us
I would say tho that this is a photo thread forum, so if you'd like to post in here, you should really stick a photo in here too...Yno to keep it relevant
(If not of you, then of something you like at least)
Thanks,
Twink
(Behind the Monitor Moderator)
Actually, Derek did do that... after I suggested he join us in the madness.
Heavens only knows what page it's back on, but here's a link to all the BioWare posts in here... his is an imgr link in one of the first few posts: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/13251987&lf=8
#7036
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 12:51
DragonRacer wrote...
Actually, Derek did do that... after I suggested he join us in the madness.
Heavens only knows what page it's back on, but here's a link to all the BioWare posts in here... his is an imgr link in one of the first few posts: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/13251987&lf=8
Well he should do it again then! Give us all another taste of the awesome
#7037
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 01:22
Toxichobbit wrote...
DragonRacer wrote...
Actually, Derek did do that... after I suggested he join us in the madness.
Heavens only knows what page it's back on, but here's a link to all the BioWare posts in here... his is an imgr link in one of the first few posts: social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/13251987&lf=8
Well he should do it again then! Give us all another taste of the awesome.
Lol, my bad. I've only been here since pg 126
How about.....if we make it to page 300 we get more Bioware pics please?!
Also, Link & Sgt Adams, maybe you could do something creative to mark the occasion??
#7038
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 01:26
Toxichobbit wrote...
I 'm sure i once read an interview that Megan Fox gave where she basically said she knew she wasn't that great an actress and that she wouldn't be able to get the parts she did if it wasn't for her looks. That actually garnered her a bit of respect from me. Not a lot mind, but a bit at least. Given the immense egos of many succesful actors/actresses, actually admitting your not very good at your job and are getting by on your looks is pretty unusual. That was, however, a few years ago. She may well have changed her tune by now.
And i'm shocked that after several page of talking about good and bad films, Uwe Boll hasn't come up once.
He makes Michael Bay look good.
Hmm, ok I'll give her that. Who's Uwe Boll?
greghorvath wrote...
If I want good looking women, I browse through playboy or the Behind the monitor... thread. If I want good acting by a woman, I look for movies by the likes of Emma Thompson, Meryl Streep, Nicole Kidman, Naomie Watts so on and so forth.
Megan Foxes and Rosie Whatevs as actresses... bah...
...You charmer
I would say tho that we have a much lower plastic content than Playboy. Does that make a difference?
#7039
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 01:32
Toxichobbit wrote...
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Megan Fox is more annoying in my book (esp as apparently she is a bit of a diva), maybe even more annoying than Keira Knightley.
I 'm sure i once read an interview that Megan Fox gave where she basically said she knew she wasn't that great an actress and that she wouldn't be able to get the parts she did if it wasn't for her looks. That actually garnered her a bit of respect from me. Not a lot mind, but a bit at least. Given the immense egos of many succesful actors/actresses, actually admitting your not very good at your job and are getting by on your looks is pretty unusual. That was, however, a few years ago. She may well have changed her tune by now.
And i'm shocked that after several page of talking about good and bad films, Uwe Boll hasn't come up once.
He makes Michael Bay look good.
I do my best to ignore Boll's existence. Bay's too, most of the time.
#7040
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 01:44
I was hoping someone would notice...Twinkles DeVere wrote...
...You charmer
And I am supposed to take your word for that, right? I mean, how can I tell without the nakie pics? (right back at'ya!I would say tho that we have a much lower plastic content than Playboy. Does that make a difference?
Modifié par greghorvath, 19 décembre 2012 - 01:44 .
#7041
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 02:29
Toxichobbit wrote...
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Megan Fox is more annoying in my book (esp as apparently she is a bit of a diva), maybe even more annoying than Keira Knightley.
I 'm sure i once read an interview that Megan Fox gave where she basically said she knew she wasn't that great an actress and that she wouldn't be able to get the parts she did if it wasn't for her looks. That actually garnered her a bit of respect from me. Not a lot mind, but a bit at least. Given the immense egos of many succesful actors/actresses, actually admitting your not very good at your job and are getting by on your looks is pretty unusual. That was, however, a few years ago. She may well have changed her tune by now.
And i'm shocked that after several page of talking about good and bad films, Uwe Boll hasn't come up once.
He makes Michael Bay look good.
Yeah but..Uwe Boll is so bad it's good
@Twinkles: I hated The Hunger Games. (but each to their own, I'm not knocking you for liking it, I love plenty of films that others would wonder about lol) In fact was there anyone that didn't like that film/book? I guess my main reason is the movie really did a horrible job of the "romance" aspect..it was off. And..other things as well. Also the state of YA books.
#7042
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 03:38

it's a couple years old, but whatever
#7043
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:20
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Hmm, ok I'll give her that. Who's Uwe Boll?
Ignorance is bliss Twinkles.
#7044
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:22
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
How about.....if we make it to page 300 we get more Bioware pics please?! [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/grin.png[/smilie]
Inb4 demands for nakie bioware pics. Lathrim, i'm looking at you
Edit: *sigh* That was meant to be an edit to above, but it somehow ended up as a quote of above.
Modifié par Toxichobbit, 19 décembre 2012 - 04:23 .
#7045
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:27
TouchedByYou wrote...
Might as well.
snipped
it's a couple years old, but whatever

Modifié par Linkinator, 19 décembre 2012 - 04:27 .
#7046
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:28
Twinkles DeVere wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
Johnnie Walker wrote...
Derek Hollan wrote...
281 pages and still going strong.
I'm impressed.
We try to keep it relevant and friendly.
All the more reason I am impressed.
Love the tatt, btw
Cheers
Hi Derek,
Nice to see Bioware like us
I would say tho that this is a photo thread forum, so if you'd like to post in here, you should really stick a photo in here too...Yno to keep it relevant
(If not of you, then of something you like at least)
Thanks,
Twink
(Behind the Monitor Moderator)
Yes, no one wants to go through all 281 pages to find past posts.
*removed useless link*
Cheers
Modifié par Derek Hollan, 19 décembre 2012 - 04:35 .
#7047
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:29
Ninja'd
#7048
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:30
Not sure if mistake or commentary on people's laziness....
Modifié par Toxichobbit, 19 décembre 2012 - 04:30 .
#7049
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:35
Derek Hollan wrote...
Remember, you asked.
http://i.imgur.com/hMuy8.jpg
Cheers
Bad link...bad..
Ok, here's the original
#7050
Posté 19 décembre 2012 - 04:37
Toxichobbit wrote...
That link just takes me to the first page Derek.
Not sure if mistake or commentary on people's laziness....
Just a mistake on my part. I've been known to make a few.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





