Lord_Sirian wrote...
thatdamnlobster wrote...
i would probably beleive you if you werent offending ppl else where as well, and although i dont need to explain myself to you, i will for the sake of peace. using the idea for schrodingers cat, it is only safe to assume when one talks to a girl over the internet, until absolute evidence is brought forward it is safe to assume she is both underage and overage. mixed with the ongoing joke evry girl who is on the internet is underage i was just giving the dude a hard time. there was no need for you.Lord_Sirian wrote...
thatdamnlobster wrote...
It seems to me that you are out to be a troll today sir. And i posted A-hole. i forgot the censor on hereLord_Sirian wrote...
thatdamnlobster wrote...
i think you think im being an ****.... im notLord_Sirian wrote...
thatdamnlobster wrote...
how much you bet shes like 16 or something
Why would that matter anyway?
being a wut?![]()
Just curious as to why being 16 would matter.
??? How am I being a troll?
In the context you said it, I don't get what being 16 has to do with anything.
I see.
16 is the age of consent where I live.
I find it amusing, in a sad way, that in some countries/states it's a-ok for kids to join the army at 16, but not to give consent to have sex.
I agree on that last part. But you if your parents consent you to have sex at 16 then it's legal. Always up to the legal guardian. I still see your point.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






