670 réponses à ce sujet

[AresKeith]

anyone else glad they can get a chance to see Garrus' Family?

[KENNY4753]

AresKeith wrote...

anyone else glad they can get a chance to see Garrus' Family?

Yeah, I want to meet Garrus's dad and see how Garrus's description compares to what I think of him.

[blacqout]

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

[ElMuchu]

Xellith wrote...

SIGNED. 10 TIMES OVER.

Would be great indeed

[Gabylan001]

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Modifié par Gabylan001, 05 septembre 2012 - 07:27 .

[blacqout]

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Modifié par blacqout, 05 septembre 2012 - 07:30 .

[Gabylan001]

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

do not question it, just the way you express ........... in each thread

[AresKeith]

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

The DLC isn't even about Kal, its mainly about Palaven but if you kept him alive in ME2 you would get the option to save him or let him die. And the real idiocy is Bioware making Grunt worth 20 or 25 EMS

[blacqout]

AresKeith wrote...

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

The DLC isn't even about Kal, its mainly about Palaven but if you kept him alive in ME2 you would get the option to save him or let him die. And the real idiocy is Bioware making Grunt worth 20 or 25 EMS

It's enough about Kal Reegar that you put his name in its title.

And valuing him at 75 EMS is still stupid. That's 3x as much as any of the ME2 squadmates... all of which demonstrate considerably more talent than Kal Reegar. 

Back to the drawing board for you.

[KENNY4753]

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Actually in my playthrough I told him to go all out and he came out alive. In fact his rocket got the killing shot.
and yes Grunt should be at least 100 points

[Reptilian Rob]

I would pay for this with blood.

[AresKeith]

blacqout wrote...

It's enough about Kal Reegar that you put his name in its title.

And valuing him at 75 EMS is still stupid. That's 3x as much as any of the ME2 squadmates... all of which demonstrate considerably more talent than Kal Reegar. 

Back to the drawing board for you.

um no, not back to the drawing board for me because this isn't your thread and most of everyone else is fine with this idea regardless of Kal'Reegar

[InTheZone]

UNFORTUNATELY, WITHOUT A DISCLAIMER SAYING BIOWARE CAN USE YOUR IDEAS, THEY WON'T USE IT. ACTUALLY, I HAVEN'T EVEN READ THE TOS ON THE FORUMS SO I CAN'T REALLY SAY.

[blacqout]

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Actually in my playthrough I told him to go all out and he came out alive. In fact his rocket got the killing shot.
and yes Grunt should be at least 100 points

Yes. Grunt is more valuable than the entirety of the Alliance's fifth fleet. Does anyone who isn't an absolute moron support this absurd DLC idea?

In order for Grunt to be worth 100 points, a plethora of other assets would also need to be scaled up. 

[KENNY4753]

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Actually in my playthrough I told him to go all out and he came out alive. In fact his rocket got the killing shot.
and yes Grunt should be at least 100 points

Yes. Grunt is more valuable than the entirety of the Alliance's fifth fleet. Does anyone who isn't an absolute moron support this absurd DLC idea?

In order for Grunt to be worth 100 points, a plethora of other assets would also need to be scaled up. 

almost all the ME2 squadmates would need to be scaled up but that's besides the point what do you have against Kal'Reegar in this dlc. It isn't about him it is about Palaven, it just makes the event from ME2 (keeping Kal'Reegar alive or not) worth something, and believe it or not he is a popular character.

[AresKeith]

Reptilian Rob wrote...

I would pay for this with blood.

Turian blood  lol

[tg0618]

I'd buy this DLC. I liked Kal'Reegar in ME2. And wanted to see Palaven forever.

And Grunt should be worth 200 points.
 

[blacqout]

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Actually in my playthrough I told him to go all out and he came out alive. In fact his rocket got the killing shot.
and yes Grunt should be at least 100 points

Yes. Grunt is more valuable than the entirety of the Alliance's fifth fleet. Does anyone who isn't an absolute moron support this absurd DLC idea?

In order for Grunt to be worth 100 points, a plethora of other assets would also need to be scaled up. 

almost all the ME2 squadmates would need to be scaled up but that's besides the point what do you have against Kal'Reegar in this dlc. It isn't about him it is about Palaven, it just makes the event from ME2 (keeping Kal'Reegar alive or not) worth something, and believe it or not he is a popular character.

No, the ME2 squadmates do not need to be scaled up. Their value needs to be kept proportionate to that of other assets. 

What i have against Kal Reegar, and this DLC, is that he is under no circumstances worth 75EMS. He just isn't. Kirahee is worth 20, and Reegar is no Kirahee. Regar is worth 10 ems at most. 15 if he comes with a small team of hardened Quarian.

[KENNY4753]

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

Gabylan001 wrote...

blacqout wrote...

No we don't. Kal Reeger is nowhere near an interesting enough character to warrant any sort of DLC.

And you really think that he should be worth 75 EMS? Idiocy.

Why you always act like an ***hole? (in all threads where I see you) 

Just say: "I do not like Kal" and everyone will understand.

but no! you say: "You all say "crap". mass effect 3 is perfect" 

Slowly friend, everything can talk peacefully:innocent:

Rating Kal Reegar, a man who spectacularly gets himself killed unless Shepards sits him the corner, as a 75 EMS asset, when Grunt, who is fully capable of 'holding the line' in the Collector base himself, is only valued at 20 (maybe 25, i can't remember) is idiocy. 

Actually in my playthrough I told him to go all out and he came out alive. In fact his rocket got the killing shot.
and yes Grunt should be at least 100 points

Yes. Grunt is more valuable than the entirety of the Alliance's fifth fleet. Does anyone who isn't an absolute moron support this absurd DLC idea?

In order for Grunt to be worth 100 points, a plethora of other assets would also need to be scaled up. 

almost all the ME2 squadmates would need to be scaled up but that's besides the point what do you have against Kal'Reegar in this dlc. It isn't about him it is about Palaven, it just makes the event from ME2 (keeping Kal'Reegar alive or not) worth something, and believe it or not he is a popular character.

No, the ME2 squadmates do not need to be scaled up. Their value needs to be kept proportionate to that of other assets. 

What i have against Kal Reegar, and this DLC, is that he is under no circumstances worth 75EMS. He just isn't. Kirahee is worth 20, and Reegar is no Kirahee. Regar is worth 10 ems at most. 15 if he comes with a small team of hardened Quarian.

Let's say this did become a dlc as is, then just don't get it if you don't like it or kill Reegar in ME2 so he won't appear. There are plenty of War Assets that I think are rated way to high but oh well, it 's not like the EMS points really matter that much. Even without 75 for Reegar and 50% readiness you still have enough for the "best" ending anyway so 75 more isn't a big deal.

[LilLino]

OMG so you don't agree with ****ING little number that means almost nothing in the grand scheme of things and that's the only reason you don't want this DLC?

Sorry sir, are you mad?

I've wanted to see Palaven since ME1. Turians are my favourite race and Garrus is my favourite character. Kal'Reegar is cool too so why not put him in here too.

But nooo, let's start a flame war over how much WA points he is worth.

[blacqout]

KENNY4753 wrote...
Let's say this did become a dlc as is, then just don't get it if you don't like it 

Not an option. Why should i, a fan who was actually able to read and understand one of the game's driving mechanics, miss out on additional content.

Modifié par blacqout, 05 septembre 2012 - 08:30 .

[AresKeith]

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
Let's say this did become a dlc as is, then just don't get it if you don't like it 

Not an option. Why should i, a fan who was actually able to read and understand one of the game's driving mechanics, miss out on additional content.

because your throwing a fit over something that doesn't really matter at all over getting to see the Turian homeworld

[KENNY4753]

AresKeith wrote...

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
Let's say this did become a dlc as is, then just don't get it if you don't like it 

Not an option. Why should i, a fan who was actually able to read and understand one of the game's driving mechanics, miss out on additional content.

because your throwing a fit over something that doesn't really matter at all over getting to see the Turian homeworld

Exactly. The war asset number is irrelevant. Gaining Kal'Reegar as a war asset isn't the mian point of this dlc idea. The main point is going to Palaven and having an objective there. Reegar is just another part of it but the dlc isn't just about Kal'Reegar. 

[blacqout]

AresKeith wrote...

blacqout wrote...

KENNY4753 wrote...
Let's say this did become a dlc as is, then just don't get it if you don't like it 

Not an option. Why should i, a fan who was actually able to read and understand one of the game's driving mechanics, miss out on additional content.

because your throwing a fit over something that doesn't really matter at all over getting to see the Turian homeworld

If you can't even get a detail such as the actual worth of Kal Reegar to the allied war effort correct, how can i possibly expect you to get Palavan right?

I scrolled down to where you listed the new assets (very imaginative, btw... 'reaper tech') noticed your ridiculous overestimation of Reegar's abilities, and that told me all i needed to know.

Modifié par blacqout, 05 septembre 2012 - 08:39 .

[AresKeith]

blacqout wrote...

If you can't even get a detail such as the actual worth of Kal Reegar to the allied war effort correct, how can i possibly expect you to get Palavan right?

I scrolled down to where you listed the new assets (very imaginative, btw... 'reaper tech') noticed your ridiculous overestimation of Reegar's abilities, and that told me all i needed to know.

So your just trolling while commenting like an ***hole, ok then