Ozida wrote...
Just by numbers:
ME3: 8 side missions (listed above) + 6 N7 quests
ME 2: 20 side missions
ME1: 57 side missions
I maybe missing some from ME3, but you get the point.
Normandy_Captain wrote...
@Ozida I honestly did not know ME2 had 20 side missions. actually, that reminds me of another thing I miss; the little side missions were you had to talk to people to complete them. I really enjoyed the mission with the patriarch at omega in ME2.
Ozida wrote...
Just by numbers:
ME3: 8 side missions (listed above) + 6 N7 quests
ME 2: 54 side missions (sorry, corrected number from: http://masseffect.wikia.com/)
ME1: 57 side missions
I maybe missing some from ME3, but you get the point.
Modifié par Ozida, 23 juillet 2012 - 04:37 .
Normandy_Captain wrote...
@Ozida I honestly did not know ME2 had 20 side missions. actually, that reminds me of another thing I miss; the little side missions were you had to talk to people to complete them. I really enjoyed the mission with the patriarch at omega in ME2.
MegaSovereign wrote...
It honestly doesn't feel like ME2 had 50+ side missions.
Are you counting fetch quests and loyalty missions?
Modifié par x7he pr0digyx, 23 juillet 2012 - 04:54 .
I went to the psuedo link he provided and didn't find any information on this one has this, this one has that. Looking http://masseffect.wi...m/wiki/Missions I still can't come up with that number. There are, of course, scan missions that didn't show up here, but unless the count includes Dossier Missions, and loyalty missions, I can't see the side quest count being that high.JeffZero wrote...
MegaSovereign wrote...
It honestly doesn't feel like ME2 had 50+ side missions.
Are you counting fetch quests and loyalty missions?
He or she absolutely must be. In which case I'd contend we start throwing in all the fetch quests, choose-a-side confrontations, and so forth in ME3.
TookYoCookies wrote...
Side missions in ME1 were fine.
Modifié par pirate1802, 23 juillet 2012 - 05:45 .
pirate1802 wrote...
TookYoCookies wrote...
Side missions in ME1 were fine.
Walking into the same room 30-40 times, just decoraed with slightly different wallpapers, killing the same people over and over again while they shout "I'll destroy you" and "Hold the line" made me pull my eyes out.
ME3 may have lesser side missions than 1 and 2 but I liked them more than the others. They were better crafated and had an emotional pull lacking in the missions of the first two. Its quality over quantity for me.
MegaSovereign wrote...
It honestly doesn't feel like ME2 had 50+ side missions.
Are you counting fetch quests and loyalty missions?
shepdog77 wrote...
Don't forget "ENEMIES EVERYWHERE!!!"
JeffZero wrote...
Indeed, but I'll definitely take one "Tuchanka Bomb Mission" over 10 ME1 assignments, for example.
xsdob wrote...
How many people had to rewatch the cutscene a bunch of times cause they messed up on the character creation?
Whelp, flying into the same cluster with planets in slightly different places each time to play pacman with the Reapers was even worse IMO. That got real old real fast, especially when it was only one or two pings until "BRRRRRRRRRP" "Reapers evaded".pirate1802 wrote...
Walking into the same room 30-40 times, just decoraed with slightly different wallpapers, killing the same people over and over again while they shout "I'll destroy you" and "Hold the line" made me pull my eyes out.
ME3 may have lesser side missions than 1 and 2 but I liked them more than the others. They were better crafated and had an emotional pull lacking in the missions of the first two. Its quality over quantity for me.
Then technically so Should the Tuchanka Bomb, Rachni, Two Rannoch, Asari Temple - ect. Quests. Niether of them is compulsory for the main story to advance, however both can affect the story in some way [ME2 via Loyalty, ME3 via EMS].pirate1802 wrote...
MegaSovereign wrote...
It honestly doesn't feel like ME2 had 50+ side missions.
Are you counting fetch quests and loyalty missions?
Technically the loyalty missions are listed under primary missions, not assignments.
Guest_Sion1138_*
Modifié par Evo_9, 23 juillet 2012 - 07:38 .
Adugan wrote...
Oh I thought you were talking about making the hot sex
This.Ranger Jack Walker wrote...
I think all 3 are awesome. One less awesome than the other two but still awesome.
Joccaren wrote...
Whelp, flying into the same cluster with planets in slightly different places each time to play pacman with the Reapers was even worse IMO. That got real old real fast, especially when it was only one or two pings until "BRRRRRRRRRP" "Reapers evaded".
Personally I like a mix of both - quality and quantity. I don't want one mission that was like the Rachni ME3 one only actually engaging rather than tiring, and I don't want the scan ping fest that ME3 had for its other quests. ME1 and ME2 had a balance - there was some side missions that had substance and felt important, though they might not have been as well crafted as ME3, and there were quite a few of them too. ME3 had 3 or 4 good missions, and a whole crapton of seriously ****ty sidequests. I'd take a balance of Quality and Quantity over what was in ME3.
Then technically so Should the Tuchanka Bomb, Rachni, Two Rannoch, Asari Temple - ect. Quests. Niether of them is compulsory for the main story to advance, however both can affect the story in some way [ME2 via Loyalty, ME3 via EMS].
shepard1038 wrote...
This.Ranger Jack Walker wrote...
I think all 3 are awesome. One less awesome than the other two but still awesome.
Retour en haut