Das Tentakel wrote...
[...]
...History of stereotypes, hilarious 
[...]
Absolutely!
(Btw, I have read with interest what you wrote in this thread :
What type of orlesians you want in Dragon Age III (Possible Spoilers) _OP : ladyofpayne.
in lurk mode... sorry.

But even if BW could have handled those stereotypes more lightly, don't forget that in DA they have a cause (which do not mean they are true) and maybe some unexpected potential...
Consider what we know about the Orlesian nobles :
They are mostly cruel and foppish. They have lost their real hierarchic titles. They are forbidden to fight directly against each others (hence the existence of the Game).
It seems they have long been under the firm control of the imperial crown, but this could change...
BW established that first impression about Orlesians while the main DA:O character was a Fereldan.
Since BW has always taken a great care to show us the DAverse only through the very eyes of its protagonists, and since Orlais has brutally occupied Ferelden, its rather logical that the Fereldans perceive Orlaisians as cruel people.
That's for the 'cruel' part of Orlesian character (I guess it would be the easier part to correct in DA3...)
About the other parts, though, the cliché becomes much more interresting... And, actually, it is not without any parallel with the historical France :
As you stated in the quoted thread, the medieval France was a collection of nearly independant regions.
However it has become over time a very strongly centralized state ('Paris and the French desert').
If you read through the 'canon' French History with a mind to defend a 'federal' POV, you could as well look at it as the History of one only city (Paris) securing a territory as vast as possible around itself.
Orlais has not a very different History : It was at first a collection of warring city-states, until the ruler of one united them all into a single very centralized country.
The Orlaisian rulers seem very keen about keeping their nobles in line, what could actually translate by : Their nobles were (and continue to be) so very seditious that they
needed to be that much controlled.
Again, the French Kingdom History is not without similitude : Machiavel, in 'The Prince', pointed out the France as the ultimate example of a country where seizing the power from inside would be the easiest (as opposed to the Turkish Ottoman Empire.) Since there were always many factions of discontended nobles ready to hatch a coup.
He added, for this very reason, it was
also the country where keeping the power was the most difficult...
That's where the stereotypical 'foppiness' comes into play : You have already suggested (in ladyofpayne's afore mentioned thread) this cliché could come from the Court of Louis XIV (I think it's a bit older, but it would be too long to develop, wouldn't change much, and besides, it is sure that his Court really deserved that reputation).
Louis XIV, precisely, suffered while he was a child from one of the strongest nobles' rebellion : 'La Fronde' ('The Sling') during which he was held prisoner in his own castle by very powerful nobles and rich commoners, who tried to exploit his youth to force him to do their bidding. Since the Cardinal Mazarin (his main supporter and the successor of Richelieu) was on the run while gathering his army, the 'child-king' had to delay the nobles' demands (for they would have probably disposed of him as soon as he would have agreed to them).
He had no way to harm them but was very well trained as a dancer and had a passion for Theater. He used both to discourage any serious discussion with his captors (since they were themselves divided, they couldn't force him too openly without handicap).
When he became adult this 'Theater Politic' became an obsession.
He commanded a palace to be build in Versailles : At safe distance from Paris, since he distrusted as well the rich commoners who lived in the city.
He transformed the daily life of all its residents in a play in which he was the absolute center of focus.
He ordered for himself the most expensive (and rather foppish) clothes and forced his whole Court to follow his example.
Since he was an absolute king (a complete tyrant) he wasn't too afraid to fall in debt for that sort of personal expenses.
The nobles, however, had to pay... And they ruined themselves.
His spies opened every letter the nobles would send to their relatives out of their 'golden prison'.
He used frequently poison, and arbitrary arrestations were common.
Since he was such a well trained dancer and actor, he controlled each of his move or glance, each one of his words was carefuly weighted. He made a ritualized public show of his daily life's every details (including waking up and going to the toilets).
He could endure to live under the constant scrutiny of an army of courtesans who desperately tried to read their fate in every discreet sign or silence from him.
The nobles gathered in his palace, and kept loosing steadily every bit of their own remaining power, out of (legitimate) fear of retalation, but much more because they were bound in this gilded cage by... their own pride.
Now the parallel with Orlais :
We can imagine emperors who aren't themselves lulled by the Orlaisian supposed foppy pride... Who actually use it to keep their own nobility in line (low and dependent on money)
Where Loghain would ruin his own country over an absurd civil war, despite the pressing matter of the Blight,
Empress Celene would just have to give a ball... For much better results.
Pure personal supposition, but despite what Leliana believes, I'm pretty sure that there is, inside the whole bardic loose organization, a 'cell' of elite bards who control the others, in the interest of the crown.
Last but not least, if you consider what really supports the Orlesian crown, I would say it is not a powerful army,
nor a secret organization, nor a superstitious religion,
it is a power far more superior : The human pride...
And we all know where, in the hierarchy of demons, it is situated.
I wouldn't be too surprised if 'pious' Drakkon's crown had a bunch of very powerful Pride Demons bound into service by some past blood mages... (Which, Btw, would give an interresting twist into the Chantry's Home History.)
Sorry to have make this so long, but I thought it could have been interresting to see how basic stereotypes could sometimes reveal a little bit more potential, when squeezed.
Modifié par Dintonta, 01 août 2012 - 03:10 .