UserUnknown85 wrote...
Dendio1 wrote...
UserUnknown85 wrote...
I don't know whether the gun is OP or not, but here is what the gun can do, since apparently asking people to figure things out for themselves is too much to ask...
Atlas kill, 10 shots, on gold.
I know I can do it in 9 (cuz I've done it) but this is without a shotgun rail amp.
Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.c...eature=youtu.be
Piercing mod or smart choke?
Piranha X with EB V + choke V
AP ammo IV
Power amplifier IV
Shotgun amp V
NO shotgun rail amp III (which would allow you to kill it in 9 shots)
TC 4-damage
HM 6-accuracy/RoF/speed (not optimized for damage)
Proxy 6-radius/debuff/damage (not optimized for damage)
NAI 6-weapon damage/power damage/weapon damage
Fitness 4-who cares?
So you could squeeze even more damage if you built it right, though I doubt downing the atlas in 1 clip is realistic without new gear/mods/consumable additions.
On platinum, you still don't need 2 full clips, rather something around 11-12 shots.
Nobody "ridiculed" you. You made a claim based on conditions that you didn't specify. If you make a claim that the Piranha takes down Atlases in X amount of shots, but you don't specify all of the other mods you add on top of that, then it's fair for people to assume you are talking about the damage from the gun only.
When you look at the discussion in context:
1) Somebody posted Piranha damage numbers with mods
2) This person was then asked to do the math without mods
3) Your commented in response to the math without mods, claiming, "You're delusional."
4) Because you were responding to the damage numbers without mods, the only reasonable thing to assume is that you were questioning his math on how much damage an unmodified Piranha could do.
5) You claimed that the Piranha could take down an Atlas in a little over a clip with a GI speced for max damage.
6) This wasn't really an appropriate response, seeing as you were responding to base damage numbers for the Piranha.
7) Nevertheless, people read your claim, and believed it was inaccurate, which it was.
8) It was inaccurate because you didn't specify the additional variables that boosted the damage on top of what you actually specified. Level IV armor piercing ammo, gear bonus, prox mine - nobody is just going to assume that all of these additional things are included if you do not say there are.
You know what youi meant, but if you can't communicate all of the factors that contributed to your claim effectively, it's unreasonable to expect people to read your mind.