Aller au contenu

Photo

Destroy = all synthetics, but Control = only Reapers...what?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
210 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Stalker

Stalker
  • Members
  • 2 784 messages
My take on it... it doesn't make sense.

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue wave does not target Geth.

The second giant plot hole is, that Control doesn't solve the Organics-vs-Synthetics problem the slightest if it just affects the Reapers.

Modifié par Mr Massakka, 25 juillet 2012 - 08:08 .


#52
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 750 messages

dreman9999 wrote...
Nothing say that they want us to pick synthesis.Added. destroy is a concept of something like an emp blast. Remeber, destory affects all tech. If it affect all tech, i's understandable why it kills AI. Tech is the reson they are alive. Destroy justr curropt their programing to the point it can't be restored to the way it was. Basicly a giant mind wipe for machines.
Nothing says that that synthetic can be restored but who ever they were is gone forever.

The question of why it affects AIs only but still leaves other tech functional (which it clearly does) has no answer, apart from bad writing. It also has no motive aside from falsely dragging down destroy. They want synthesis because it's the most "artsy"

:sick:

#53
Fawx9

Fawx9
  • Members
  • 1 134 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

And again, if their is a reaper only signal used for control why didn't destroy just piggy back onto it for its targeting?

There really is no good excuse how destroy can have such a stupid targeting system when compared to the others.

It's using the system thats already there. In control you just using the system to change itsefl. Destroy is just something like  an emp blast.


If its an EMP then it should target all tech, from PC to Reapers. That didn't happen it only targetted living synthetics somehow.

The fact that it can target things specifically makes it seem that targetting only reapers, since they have reaper exclusive properties, such as receiving control signals, should be possible and that geth/edi were thrown in there just because.

Yes it did. The starchild spacifly state it affects all tech.


If it did none of the ships would be working.

In high EMS destory it somehow only affects living synthetics meaning it has a magical way to seperate them from a standard PC. Meaning there should have been a way to target a Reaper only property, such as the control sigal from the catalyst.

The geth/edi are simply a punishment for choosing destory, there is no reason for them to be there if the waves of energy are smart enough to discremenate at different levels.

#54
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 750 messages

Mr Massakka wrote...

My take on it... it doesn't make sense.

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue wave does not target Geth.

No, it's bad writing that the geth are targeted at all, in any ending.

#55
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys
everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in
a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue
wave does not target Geth.


Why you assume it what difference in targeting mechanism, and not in beam properteries?

#56
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages
It's because they didn't trust that anybody would pick Control or Synthesis, so they nerfed Destroy extra-narratively to make you feel bad. There really isn't another reason.

#57
v TricKy v

v TricKy v
  • Members
  • 1 017 messages

Mr Massakka wrote...

My take on it... it doesn't make sense.

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue wave does not target Geth.

To be fair you see the Geth in front of a Reaper in the Control slides so we go back to "Speculation from everyone" even in the EC which should have actually give closure to everything

#58
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Marauder Shields N7 wrote...

space magic


BatmanPWNS wrote...

The perfectly logical excuse is............Space magic


mosesarose wrote...

Marauder Shields N7 wrote...

space magic


I always love this answer +1


Carlthestrange wrote...

Apparently the Red light can't distinguish between Reapers and Synthetics, but the blue light can.

Because reasons.



*facepalm*

wow...you guys really need everything explained...and are not able to think ONE BIT for yourself...it is truly astounding.

Energy can be used in different ways? what?...there is a difference between overloading all synthetics and changing the command signal? huh? how is that possible ?

really guys...take a book and try to learn something.
basic education is a good thing.

#59
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

Fawx9 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

And again, if their is a reaper only signal used for control why didn't destroy just piggy back onto it for its targeting?

There really is no good excuse how destroy can have such a stupid targeting system when compared to the others.

It's using the system thats already there. In control you just using the system to change itsefl. Destroy is just something like  an emp blast.


If its an EMP then it should target all tech, from PC to Reapers. That didn't happen it only targetted living synthetics somehow.

The fact that it can target things specifically makes it seem that targetting only reapers, since they have reaper exclusive properties, such as receiving control signals, should be possible and that geth/edi were thrown in there just because.

Yes it did. The starchild spacifly state it affects all tech.


If it did none of the ships would be working.

In high EMS destory it somehow only affects living synthetics meaning it has a magical way to seperate them from a standard PC. Meaning there should have been a way to target a Reaper only property, such as the control sigal from the catalyst.

The geth/edi are simply a punishment for choosing destory, there is no reason for them to be there if the waves of energy are smart enough to discremenate at different levels.

Why do you think the normady crashed on the planet? It did stop working but it was restored. Affect does not mean destroy all tech. It just means it stopped the tech from working till it's restored and repaired. But want that means with an AI is a massive mind wipe. Who ever they were would be gone. THink of it like brain death for machines.

#60
Fawx9

Fawx9
  • Members
  • 1 134 messages

Lord Goose wrote...

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys
everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in
a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue
wave does not target Geth.


Why you assume it what difference in targeting mechanism, and not in beam properteries?


Because then you are implying that a beam of energy is sentient and that bascially proves the whole SPACE MAGIC :wizard: meme.

I thought the goal of the EC was to get away from that.

#61
Stalker

Stalker
  • Members
  • 2 784 messages

v TricKy v wrote...

Mr Massakka wrote...

My take on it... it doesn't make sense.

The Crucible emits a control signal or a signal that destroys everything. It should target the exact same lifeforms, just in a different way. It's simply a giant plot hole that the blue wave does not target Geth.

To be fair you see the Geth in front of a Reaper in the Control slides so we go back to "Speculation from everyone" even in the EC which should have actually give closure to everything

I get the impression the EC hasn't fixed anything at all: We still get the same linear bull**** where nothing matters, it still goes against everything Mass Effect stands for, and it still lacks explanation and closure, even though the last cutscene is damn 15 minutes long already... I guess it's very hard to give reasoing to such an amount of space magic.

#62
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

maaaze wrote...

*facepalm*

wow...you guys really need everything explained...and are not able to think ONE BIT for yourself...it is truly astounding.

Energy can be used in different ways? what?...there is a difference between overloading all synthetics and changing the command signal? huh? how is that possible ?

really guys...take a book and try to learn something.
basic education is a good thing.


Are you denying that the primary purpose of Destroy functioning differently than Control had nothing to do with in-game logic or reason, and was in fact a giant sign by BioWare saying, "Please consider our other endings?!"

#63
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

o Ventus wrote...
An initial shockwave is released from the Citadel, then the Crucible fires a beam to the adjacent relay, which then fires another beam to another relay before collapsing in a shockwave itself.

Either way, it doesn't change the fact that there's no implicit or explicit reason given for why the two are different, or how it's even possible that they could be different.

There is no initial beam from the Citadel.Only the shockwave is amplified and sent by the relays.

They are different. And the reasoning is very clear. The mechanism for control is already established. Only destroy and synthesis require something new.

The holokid already controls the Reapers. You are replacing the holokid. You're going through existing channels.


Yes, there is an initial shockwave emanating from the Citadel

That video is pre-EC, but they never changed the animation of the Crucible firing, so it's valid.

Shockwave from Citadel -> Citadel fires shot to relay -> Relay spins really fast, fire shot -> Relay collapses -> Repeat 3-4 ad infinitum

#64
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

maaaze wrote...

*facepalm*

wow...you guys really need everything explained...and are not able to think ONE BIT for yourself...it is truly astounding.

Energy can be used in different ways? what?...there is a difference between overloading all synthetics and changing the command signal? huh? how is that possible ?

really guys...take a book and try to learn something.
basic education is a good thing.


Are you denying that the primary purpose of Destroy functioning differently than Control had nothing to do with in-game logic or reason, and was in fact a giant sign by BioWare saying, "Please consider our other endings?!"


No, it was meant to be a hard choice, based on what you are willing to risk and sacrifice...destroy without sacrifice is meaningless...

it is hollywood BS. it is boring. It goes against the whole Narrative.

#65
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
Nothing say that they want us to pick synthesis.Added. destroy is a concept of something like an emp blast. Remeber, destory affects all tech. If it affect all tech, i's understandable why it kills AI. Tech is the reson they are alive. Destroy justr curropt their programing to the point it can't be restored to the way it was. Basicly a giant mind wipe for machines.
Nothing says that that synthetic can be restored but who ever they were is gone forever.

The question of why it affects AIs only but still leaves other tech functional (which it clearly does) has no answer, apart from bad writing. It also has no motive aside from falsely dragging down destroy. They want synthesis because it's the most "artsy"

:sick:


It does Affect all tech, but it does not destory it. Tech can be restored if all it's programs are wiped. But with AI's their progrming is there persona, ideals,Ego, and self. If that is gone who every they were is also gone. If your ego is gone youwho you were is dead. If your forget who you were and never remeber who you werethe person you were is dead.

#66
Lord Goose

Lord Goose
  • Members
  • 865 messages

Because then you are implying that a beam of energy is sentient and that bascially proves the whole SPACE MAGIC meme.


I think, it that in different endings energy is converted into different forms.

Low EMS Destory (Crucible is damaged, not functioning properly). Energy is disastrous for all technology and even organic beings.
High EMS Destroy (Crucible is relatively in one piece, functioning properly). Energy is disastrous only for anyone and anything of certain technological level.
Control. Energy is released in a manner what only Reapers can comprehend.
Synthesis. Energy is released in different manner, and it transforms everything and everyone.

Modifié par Lord Goose, 25 juillet 2012 - 08:19 .


#67
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 750 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

Are you denying that the primary purpose of Destroy functioning differently than Control had nothing to do with in-game logic or reason, and was in fact a giant sign by BioWare saying, "Please consider our other endings?!"

It has nothing to do with control and everything to do with the fact that  "destroying all synthetics but differentiating between sentient and non-sentient tech" is bull****.

If you posit that control also controls EDI and the geth you're still left with the same problem: Why am I only controlling Reapers, geth and EDI when I should be controlling every piece of tech in the galaxy?

Destroy was indeed sabotaged. But it has nothing to do with control.

#68
Fawx9

Fawx9
  • Members
  • 1 134 messages

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Fawx9 wrote...

And again, if their is a reaper only signal used for control why didn't destroy just piggy back onto it for its targeting?

There really is no good excuse how destroy can have such a stupid targeting system when compared to the others.

It's using the system thats already there. In control you just using the system to change itsefl. Destroy is just something like  an emp blast.


If its an EMP then it should target all tech, from PC to Reapers. That didn't happen it only targetted living synthetics somehow.

The fact that it can target things specifically makes it seem that targetting only reapers, since they have reaper exclusive properties, such as receiving control signals, should be possible and that geth/edi were thrown in there just because.

Yes it did. The starchild spacifly state it affects all tech.


If it did none of the ships would be working.

In high EMS destory it somehow only affects living synthetics meaning it has a magical way to seperate them from a standard PC. Meaning there should have been a way to target a Reaper only property, such as the control sigal from the catalyst.

The geth/edi are simply a punishment for choosing destory, there is no reason for them to be there if the waves of energy are smart enough to discremenate at different levels.

Why do you think the normady crashed on the planet? It did stop working but it was restored. Affect does not mean destroy all tech. It just means it stopped the tech from working till it's restored and repaired. But want that means with an AI is a massive mind wipe. Who ever they were would be gone. THink of it like brain death for machines.


What you are saying makes no sense.

So for a normal machine its an EMP that just shuts it off. For a living machine it shuts it off and also kills their harddrive?

The only way that makes any kind of sense is if the EDI and the Geth were stupid enough to store all of their 'personal' data into RAM, which would indead be cleared in the case of a power failure.

And even if the Normandy had backups for every system (that would be a stupidly large amount) then why cant the Geth or EDI be simply restored to their last save point?

#69
CrutchCricket

CrutchCricket
  • Members
  • 7 750 messages

o Ventus wrote...

Yes, there is an initial shockwave emanating from the Citadel

That video is pre-EC, but they never changed the animation of the Crucible firing, so it's valid.

Shockwave from Citadel -> Citadel fires shot to relay -> Relay spins really fast, fire shot -> Relay collapses -> Repeat 3-4 ad infinitum

Shockwave =/= beam.

Pre-EC, same thing, no beam.

Thread has moved on.

#70
V-rcingetorix

V-rcingetorix
  • Members
  • 575 messages
The only problem I can see with the destroy ending is why Geth and EDI are linked to the Catalyst at all...

Logically, the Normandy would have trouble flying w/o EDI (I can accept the crash landing for repairs as a no-EDI idea), but why the Geth as well?

Reapers are linked, that much we know. Blowing up that link would be like an opera singer hitting a note high enough to cause sympathetic vibrations in glass...shattering them.

Geth are not in that link, nor is Shepard (unless being inside the Catalyst counts?). Why would synthetics not held within the Reaper Collective be affected? That's like saying a wooden wall supporting a glass chandelier would be shattered; because the glass shattered.

The Crucible has huge amounts of power, oceans of H3, a few civilizations worth of Element Zero.

Big boom, check.

Sending the boom to the Reapers using the link, logical. Check.

Of the four strongest forces in the universe, only gravity would have the range to affect everything. Yet everything can still exist afterwards, even the bodies of the Reapers (unless that was a money-saving scene edit, which would make sense). SO all that was destroyed was the minds of the Reapers, Geth and EDI?

#71
Adanu

Adanu
  • Members
  • 1 400 messages
You people are reading way too much into this crap. Again.

#72
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Yes, there is an initial shockwave emanating from the Citadel

That video is pre-EC, but they never changed the animation of the Crucible firing, so it's valid.

Shockwave from Citadel -> Citadel fires shot to relay -> Relay spins really fast, fire shot -> Relay collapses -> Repeat 3-4 ad infinitum

Shockwave =/= beam.

Pre-EC, same thing, no beam.

Thread has moved on.


I said initial shockwave, which is followed by a beam fired from the Citadel to the Charon relay. I never said they were one and the same.

Just admit that the Crucible firing is pointless in Control, because it is.

#73
dreman9999

dreman9999
  • Members
  • 19 067 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

maaaze wrote...

*facepalm*

wow...you guys really need everything explained...and are not able to think ONE BIT for yourself...it is truly astounding.

Energy can be used in different ways? what?...there is a difference between overloading all synthetics and changing the command signal? huh? how is that possible ?

really guys...take a book and try to learn something.
basic education is a good thing.


Are you denying that the primary purpose of Destroy functioning differently than Control had nothing to do with in-game logic or reason, and was in fact a giant sign by BioWare saying, "Please consider our other endings?!"

No.
Destroy =emp blast

control= rewrite programing.

Destroy used the mass relay network to send out an emp blast.
Control used the mass rely to seen new commands to all the AI's(REAPERS) that are linked to the network like computers and a network get mass upgrade via network connection.

#74
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

CrutchCricket wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...
Nothing say that they want us to pick synthesis.Added. destroy is a concept of something like an emp blast. Remeber, destory affects all tech. If it affect all tech, i's understandable why it kills AI. Tech is the reson they are alive. Destroy justr curropt their programing to the point it can't be restored to the way it was. Basicly a giant mind wipe for machines.
Nothing says that that synthetic can be restored but who ever they were is gone forever.

The question of why it affects AIs only but still leaves other tech functional (which it clearly does) has no answer, apart from bad writing. It also has no motive aside from falsely dragging down destroy. They want synthesis because it's the most "artsy"

:sick:


Exactly just one more reason I can't stand Synthesis. :sick:

#75
v TricKy v

v TricKy v
  • Members
  • 1 017 messages

maaaze wrote...

CronoDragoon wrote...

maaaze wrote...

*facepalm*

wow...you guys really need everything explained...and are not able to think ONE BIT for yourself...it is truly astounding.

Energy can be used in different ways? what?...there is a difference between overloading all synthetics and changing the command signal? huh? how is that possible ?

really guys...take a book and try to learn something.
basic education is a good thing.


Are you denying that the primary purpose of Destroy functioning differently than Control had nothing to do with in-game logic or reason, and was in fact a giant sign by BioWare saying, "Please consider our other endings?!"


No, it was meant to be a hard choice, based on what you are willing to risk and sacrifice...destroy without sacrifice is meaningless...

it is hollywood BS. it is boring. It goes against the whole Narrative.

So you wished that Shepard and his squad died at the end of ME1?
Do let everyone die in the suicide mission because it would be meaningless without a sacrifice?