Aller au contenu

Photo

The Choices come from the Crucible not the Catalyst! [NEW Updated]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
303 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages
So...I think this picture Image IPB



pretty much shows us how the choices come from the crucible.

can be also found here: 

http://imageshack.us...explainati.png/ 

Picture was made by  BSN Member : Mobius-Silent


Old OP :
[quote] There is no evidence that the Catalyst creates these choices.

none. it makes no sense that he created these choises.

The Crucible just repurpose the existing mechanism that were already on the citadel

For example:

The tube could just be designed to transport unused energy to be taken some where else on the citadel...however, if you shoot that tube the explosive energy causes a chain reaction with the beam that results in energy wave that is leathal to synthetics. If you want, I can make similar examples for control and synthesis. 

The Catalyst just explains what the crucible does.

If the idea of synthesis was intended as a use of the crucible by its designers is debatable.

but destroy and control are not. these option originate from the Crucible and its designers.

I will leave two interessting replys here :

[quote]tyrvas wrote...

@ maaaze

IMO

Catalyst for Peace = Super Computer Brain (AI), built as part of the Citadel.
Creators add 2 failsafes to Catalyst for Peace, 
Override Switch = Control 
Shut Down / Kill Switch = Destroy

1) Catalyst was programmed to find a Solution to the organic/synthetic problem,
It's best solution upto now... Harvesting the Galaxy every 50,000 years or so.

2) Catalyst was not programmed to Override itself or Destroy itself.
Only organics can use the failsafes, Catalyst says so, it cannot make
the changes only Shepard can.

Now Catalyst says his been changed because of the Crucible and Shepard.
In other words it has been HACKED, and offers Shepard the availabe options.

Shep can, Destroy, Control or try out one of the Catalyst previously failed solutions Synthesis,
which the Catalyst says is the final evolution BUT it had tried it before and FAILED....
.[/quote] 



[quote]
[...Edited for lenght, full post can be found on page 11...]
[quote]elitehunter34 wrote...

[quote]elitehunter34 wrote... 
Maaze you're initial premise wrong. The control and destroy apparatuses did not come from the Crucible. Synthesis is simply the beam down the middle. When the Crucible docked you can see that these apparatuses weren't on the Crucible, so they had to come from the Citadel. The Crucible allows these options to happen, but it didn't create them. Look at this part. The Crucible is on the top and the rest are on the bottom. There is no way these apparatuses came from the Crucible. 

[/quote] 

I never argued that the trigger mechanism were on the crucible. They are not.

These triggers are ether repurposed meachnism of the Citadel that had originally different purposes.

Or [like tyrvas pointed out]  these mechanisms were set in place by the original creators of the catalyst as a failsave.

These arguements are backed up by the statement that the crucible is adaptive. meaning it uses parts of the citadel to fullfill its design.

Ether way...there is no evidence that the Catalyst set up these mechanisms.

And I remind you ...Mechanism he himself can not activate...and he still produces even if Synthesis is not possible.
[quote]elitehunter34 wrote... 
If this is true than this means that the these apparatuses were built into the Citadel. The Citadel was created by the Reapers. The Reapers created the Citadel and the Mass Relays as stated in Mass Effect 1. We have no proof to suggest otherwise. This means that the apparatuses were put on the Citadel at some point in time by someone and the Reapers didn't notice, care, or bizarrely put them in themselves.  Because of this, this means that the Crucible did not create them, it only powers them.  Whether or not the Catalyst created them is unknown.
[/quote]  

The only time it is suggested that the citadel was truly build by the reapers, is when Soverign says...that they relay on technology they created and build by them.

This goes against the Idea that the creators of the catalyst set up a failsave.
we don´t know if he was simply told that they had build it or if he himself was the first reaper.

If he was the first reaper than he was part of the creator of the Catalyst. which means he could have put failsaves in place before he became a reaper. 

If not, he could just assume this (or be told by the first reaper) and truly believes it because being a reaper makes your selfreflection entirly based on superiority and therefore concludes that they build these things themself.

I admit i have no real evidance to back this up...but it is in the realm of possibilty...to much about the reapers is still unknown.

My own Idea that these things were just repurposed still stands and is backed up by the adaptive statement.

[/quote]

[/quote] 

Modifié par maaaze, 16 août 2012 - 11:20 .


#2
Applepie_Svk

Applepie_Svk
  • Members
  • 5 469 messages
Yes and it´s why choice chamber is built on Citadel ... Herp Derp hurr durr

Image IPB

Do you still believe to Catalys, aren´t you ? +1 star for entertaiment

Modifié par Applepie_Svk, 25 juillet 2012 - 09:16 .


#3
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages
Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.

#4
Samtheman63

Samtheman63
  • Members
  • 2 916 messages
all the choices were on the citadel and presented to him by the catalyst

#5
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Applepie_Svk wrote...


please just go away...your sad attempts at humor are a waste of everybodys time...especially your own.

#6
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages
The Catalyst says the crucible has changed him and made new possibilities. Then he goes into pretty great detail about what the choices do. Plus the areas where you interface with Destroy and Control are on the Citadel.

#7
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.

#8
Applepie_Svk

Applepie_Svk
  • Members
  • 5 469 messages

maaaze wrote...

Applepie_Svk wrote...


please just go away...your sad attempts at humor are a waste of everybodys time...especially your own.


Please just stop deffending Catalyst and his solution - it makes lot of people sick, how can someone deffend something so irrational for so long :kissing:

#9
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

D24O wrote...

The Catalyst says the crucible has changed him and made new possibilities. Then he goes into pretty great detail about what the choices do. Plus the areas where you interface with Destroy and Control are on the Citadel.


yes...they were repurposed....the crucible adapts to what is there.

The Catalyst says the crucible has changed him and made new possibilities 

his perspective has changed...that does not mean that he created these choices...it makes no sense that he would create a choice which undermines his search for a permament solution.

The crucible uses the citadel (catalyst) for its own means...turning the reapers weapon against them self

Modifié par maaaze, 25 juillet 2012 - 09:24 .


#10
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.


That's what I said. That's what a proxy is. He offers Synthesis as the best solution offered by the Crucible.

#11
Fawx9

Fawx9
  • Members
  • 1 134 messages
So let me get this straight, someone designed an energy source that somehow takes into account a magical energy refinery on a part of the citadel no one has access to except for the Star Jar?

#12
Eain

Eain
  • Members
  • 1 501 messages
I like the part where the united races of the galaxy accidentally and unknowingly built a machine that could give synthetics DNA. It's as though the Romans would have suddenly and accidentally built the Large Hadron Collider because they found an alien construction manual that was somehow "remarkably simple to understand."

#13
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages
Synthesis is by the Crucible, Control and Destroy are on the Citadel

#14
D24O

D24O
  • Members
  • 7 579 messages

maaaze wrote...

yes...they were repurposed....the crucible adapts to what is there.



#15
JaceBelerin

JaceBelerin
  • Members
  • 606 messages

maaaze wrote...

So please, stop pretending 

But then I wouldn't be speculating. And there's no fun in that.

#16
v TricKy v

v TricKy v
  • Members
  • 1 017 messages

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.

Shepard could have done nothing. It was the Catalyst who got you up there in the first place. Also how can he explain the crubible if he has nothing to do with it?
And if he really has nothing to do with it that means that all cycles build a giant device for altering something which they didnt know existed.

#17
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.


That's what I said. That's what a proxy is. He offers Synthesis as the best solution offered by the Crucible.


No the crucible offer these solution...it is important to make this distinction.

synthesis is just his idea...but he can not offer what he did not created.

#18
JShepppp

JShepppp
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

Applepie_Svk wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Applepie_Svk wrote...


please just go away...your sad attempts at humor are a waste of everybodys time...especially your own.


Please just stop deffending Catalyst and his solution - it makes lot of people sick, how can someone deffend something so irrational for so long :kissing:


Hes not defending the catalyst. Nobody thinks the catalyst is morally right. Blind hate for starchild leads to a bias in interpreting the story. 

And the catalyst is not entirely irrational. It thinks forced eternal peace is impossible. That's quite right. It's abhorrent and horrific solution is imperfect and wrong by our standards. But it's not stupid. 

#19
Taboo

Taboo
  • Members
  • 20 234 messages

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.


That's what I said. That's what a proxy is. He offers Synthesis as the best solution offered by the Crucible.


No the crucible offer these solution...it is important to make this distinction.

synthesis is just his idea...but he can not offer what he did not created.


I have said this for my last two posts.

He is a proxy that explains the functions of the Crucible. They are not his solutions.

Read what I said.

#20
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.


That's what I said. That's what a proxy is. He offers Synthesis as the best solution offered by the Crucible.


No the crucible offer these solution...it is important to make this distinction.

synthesis is just his idea...but he can not offer what he did not created.


The Starbrat said he tried Synthesis before and failed

#21
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

v TricKy v wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.

Shepard could have done nothing. It was the Catalyst who got you up there in the first place. Also how can he explain the crubible if he has nothing to do with it?
And if he really has nothing to do with it that means that all cycles build a giant device for altering something which they didnt know existed.


Shepard could have done nothing. It was the Catalyst who got you up there in the first place. 

NO!!!...it is the crucible who get´s you up in the first place. There is no reason to believe that the catalyst pulls you up. 

His dialoge would make no sense if he were the one who pulls you up.

IT is the crucibles doing.

argument 1 : it makes sense that the designers would include a way to get to the crucible in case the arms a closed. And you would put this mechanism in place from where you open the arms of the citadel.

argument 2: the citadel being part of the catalyst does not imply he has control over it. As much you don´t have control over your heartbeat.

argument 3: the following to statements imply that he did not lift Shaperd up.

"you being here, the first organic ever, proves my solution won´t work anymore" this statement makes no sense if the catalyst himself brought him there. Here meaning a place to activate the crucible.

In the low ems ending : "Why are you here ?" the catalyst himself is surprised that Shaperd did make it to the crucible...it makes no sense for him to ask him that question if he himself brought him there. Surly he knows what Shaperd intends to do. 

#22
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages
Yea, which makes the ending make even less sense, if the choices are coming from the crucible, which was built by previous civilizations, how does it have a 'choice' which is EXACTLY what the Catalyst wants?

It's f-ing ridiculous.


https://encrypted-tb...sGNCg7CiY3n3_Nr

#23
BigBadMammogram

BigBadMammogram
  • Members
  • 182 messages
The catalyst says the crucible changed him. He also says the crucible is nothing more than a crude power source. He contradicts himself constantly.

Nothing in the end makes any sense

#24
Mazebook

Mazebook
  • Members
  • 1 524 messages

Taboo-XX wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

maaaze wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

Yes maaaze we gathered this information.

He's a proxy that offers an opinion.

But that doesn't mean he isn't a horrendous ass pull.


No he does not offer...he gives context. Shaperd could have done everything alone without the Catalyst knowlege.
but he would have no context as what he was about to do...

that is why the catalyst reveals himself...to explain himself and explain the crucible.


That's what I said. That's what a proxy is. He offers Synthesis as the best solution offered by the Crucible.


No the crucible offer these solution...it is important to make this distinction.

synthesis is just his idea...but he can not offer what he did not created.


I have said this for my last two posts.

He is a proxy that explains the functions of the Crucible. They are not his solutions.

Read what I said.

Than I am glad you argee...
But you said the Catalyst offers!...you can only offer something that youself posses.
which is he does not.

#25
jstme

jstme
  • Members
  • 2 008 messages
I am glad that you agree that catalyst is not needed. A panel with 3 huge buttons and some neutral holo explaining things (and not the reaper king itself suddenly becoming mentor and guide) would be so much better.
Not ideal.But waaaay better then that glowing monstrosity.