Aller au contenu

Photo

Operation Nerfwatch [Starting now until the end of time]


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
150 réponses à ce sujet

#76
3XT3RM1N4TUS

3XT3RM1N4TUS
  • Members
  • 2 443 messages

Dendio1 wrote...

What is this thread about? There is a nerfer within all of us

I shall remain pure among impurity.

#77
Scudman_Alpha

Scudman_Alpha
  • Members
  • 547 messages

Felis Menari wrote...

Destroyer equipped with a revenant LMG, ready for duty sir. The nerfers shall not get past my hail of bullets!



if they manage to i'll throw them right back with either lash or throw so do not worry

#78
HammerFists

HammerFists
  • Members
  • 94 messages

E71 wrote...

Hell yeah, me too. I can't stand idly by while those soldiers who call themselves allies sabotage our weaponry and abilities.


Then this must mean... nerfers are indoctrinated! Playing against us the entire time! :o
 

#79
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages

3XT3RM1N4TUS wrote...

Dendio1 wrote...

What is this thread about? There is a nerfer within all of us

I shall remain pure among impurity.


This is why you are my second-in-command.

/(::)'s have been given to all those who have not received

#80
CptSketch13

CptSketch13
  • Members
  • 678 messages
I'm down for cookies

#81
Grogimus

Grogimus
  • Members
  • 145 messages

Jump2224 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR


HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR


DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. 


HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR


DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR


guyz

hey, hey guys

stop being /v/ lite

this is a joke thread, be funny


You're right.  I understand this.  My apologies.  Hell....I knew it immediately.  I'm just so tired of the anti-nerf crowd misrepresenting facts. 

With that in mind.....

You have my Harrier!

#82
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages

HammerFists wrote...

E71 wrote...

Hell yeah, me too. I can't stand idly by while those soldiers who call themselves allies sabotage our weaponry and abilities.


Then this must mean... nerfers are indoctrinated! Playing against us the entire time! :o
 


Bioware has now provided us with a plot twist. :P

#83
Shad Croly

Shad Croly
  • Members
  • 1 046 messages
Lucky me, I just bought a new Biotic Amp. Time to test it out on some nerfers.

#84
BlackoutOmega

BlackoutOmega
  • Members
  • 707 messages
Lets do this team

#85
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages
Thank you for partaking in the Operation fellow N7s.

(::) (::) (::)

#86
ka243

ka243
  • Members
  • 639 messages
There should be a bonus reward for getting a nerfer thread locked. Get the nerfers! Go! Lol

#87
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages

ka243 wrote...

There should be a bonus reward for getting a nerfer thread locked. Get the nerfers! Go! Lol


Good idea.  I'll contact Admiral Hackett and see what he can do.

#88
Chimera1

Chimera1
  • Members
  • 137 messages

Asebstos wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

I, at
least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to
strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary
in the future.

Apparently you can't. Or, at least, you can't respond without including a thinly veiled insult.


When confronted with a belligerent post, I responded by pointing out the irony of the post. Thus, I succeeded in achieving the rare double irony! It was not actually an attempt at insulting the poster, but instead an attempt at defending myself from his attack. Results can't lie. Apologies for insulting the poster if it was taken that way.

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Interesting.....looking back over the last 25 pages of threads, I counted two nerf threads.  One was made a month ago.  There are several 'nerf' threads made in parody.  There were also five buff threads. 


You should read more threads. Some of the titles are misleading. Dozens of weapon and character nerf requests/discussions in the first three pages.


No...I think it's you that should read more carefully.  Dozens?!  Of legitimate calls for nerfing?  You're either dillusional or ignorant. 


Legitimate calls for nerfing... Are you then throwing out the /discussion part of my response? The threads just trying to start a debate for the lulz? Those threads which then got derailed into nerfing threads? All the trolling which lead to serious bites?

I, at least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary in the future.


I've read every thread in this section of the forums for a month or more.  Most 'nerf' threads are nothing more than nonsense joke threads.  Very few threads are legitimate calls for a nerf.  On the contrary, far more threads say 'buff this'. 

Even in cases where the thread was a joke, those who 'sincerely' call for a nerf are being sarcastic or just trolling.  If you can't differentiate, then yes, you are either ignorant or delusional.  There, fixed the spelling for you. 


If someone starts a troll thread or a parody thread and that thread is then responded to by people legitimately calling for nerfs, it has been derailed and those responses are calls for nerfing.

#89
TrveOmegaSlayer

TrveOmegaSlayer
  • Members
  • 1 090 messages
sign me in

#90
Grogimus

Grogimus
  • Members
  • 145 messages

Chimera1 wrote...

Asebstos wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

I, at
least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to
strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary
in the future.

Apparently you can't. Or, at least, you can't respond without including a thinly veiled insult.


When confronted with a belligerent post, I responded by pointing out the irony of the post. Thus, I succeeded in achieving the rare double irony! It was not actually an attempt at insulting the poster, but instead an attempt at defending myself from his attack. Results can't lie. Apologies for insulting the poster if it was taken that way.

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Interesting.....looking back over the last 25 pages of threads, I counted two nerf threads.  One was made a month ago.  There are several 'nerf' threads made in parody.  There were also five buff threads. 


You should read more threads. Some of the titles are misleading. Dozens of weapon and character nerf requests/discussions in the first three pages.


No...I think it's you that should read more carefully.  Dozens?!  Of legitimate calls for nerfing?  You're either dillusional or ignorant. 


Legitimate calls for nerfing... Are you then throwing out the /discussion part of my response? The threads just trying to start a debate for the lulz? Those threads which then got derailed into nerfing threads? All the trolling which lead to serious bites?

I, at least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary in the future.


I've read every thread in this section of the forums for a month or more.  Most 'nerf' threads are nothing more than nonsense joke threads.  Very few threads are legitimate calls for a nerf.  On the contrary, far more threads say 'buff this'. 

Even in cases where the thread was a joke, those who 'sincerely' call for a nerf are being sarcastic or just trolling.  If you can't differentiate, then yes, you are either ignorant or delusional.  There, fixed the spelling for you. 


If someone starts a troll thread or a parody thread and that thread is then responded to by people legitimately calling for nerfs, it has been derailed and those responses are calls for nerfing.


I've moved on.  Can you?

#91
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages
Good news men! I have contacted Admiral Hackett, and he has agreed with my request to extend the Operations (::) supply 4x the current amount. That means more cookies for us, and another reason to do what we do.

#92
Necrotron

Necrotron
  • Members
  • 2 315 messages
This thread makes me 'Lol'. I approve!

#93
jaydubs67

jaydubs67
  • Members
  • 2 734 messages
Don't worry guys.  When bronze is too hard, you can still play this.  

Image IPB

Modifié par jaydubs67, 26 juillet 2012 - 06:43 .


#94
Guest_Flaming Snake_*

Guest_Flaming Snake_*
  • Guests

Reapinger wrote...

Lokiwithrope wrote...

You have my Harrier!


Ay, and my Talon :bandit:


AND MY AXE! Or  my Saber. Whichever works better...

Signing up!

Modifié par Flaming Snake, 26 juillet 2012 - 06:48 .


#95
Grogimus

Grogimus
  • Members
  • 145 messages

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Asebstos wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

I, at
least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to
strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary
in the future.

Apparently you can't. Or, at least, you can't respond without including a thinly veiled insult.


When confronted with a belligerent post, I responded by pointing out the irony of the post. Thus, I succeeded in achieving the rare double irony! It was not actually an attempt at insulting the poster, but instead an attempt at defending myself from his attack. Results can't lie. Apologies for insulting the poster if it was taken that way.

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Interesting.....looking back over the last 25 pages of threads, I counted two nerf threads.  One was made a month ago.  There are several 'nerf' threads made in parody.  There were also five buff threads. 


You should read more threads. Some of the titles are misleading. Dozens of weapon and character nerf requests/discussions in the first three pages.


No...I think it's you that should read more carefully.  Dozens?!  Of legitimate calls for nerfing?  You're either dillusional or ignorant. 


Legitimate calls for nerfing... Are you then throwing out the /discussion part of my response? The threads just trying to start a debate for the lulz? Those threads which then got derailed into nerfing threads? All the trolling which lead to serious bites?

I, at least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary in the future.


I've read every thread in this section of the forums for a month or more.  Most 'nerf' threads are nothing more than nonsense joke threads.  Very few threads are legitimate calls for a nerf.  On the contrary, far more threads say 'buff this'. 

Even in cases where the thread was a joke, those who 'sincerely' call for a nerf are being sarcastic or just trolling.  If you can't differentiate, then yes, you are either ignorant or delusional.  There, fixed the spelling for you. 


If someone starts a troll thread or a parody thread and that thread is then responded to by people legitimately calling for nerfs, it has been derailed and those responses are calls for nerfing.


I've moved on.  Can you?


Damn....I feel the need to expound.  I've made my point, and you've made yours.  We disagree.  Simple as that.  For my part, I'm done. 

Modifié par Grogimus, 26 juillet 2012 - 06:47 .


#96
Jump2224

Jump2224
  • Members
  • 29 messages

jaydubs67 wrote...

Don't worry guys.  When bronze is too hard, you can still play this.  

Image IPB


the words "I love you" do not properly summarize it, so I'll try to put the affections into different phrasing

I would count with you any day of the week.

#97
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages

Flaming Snake wrote...

Reapinger wrote...

Lokiwithrope wrote...

You have my Harrier!


Ay, and my Talon :bandit:


AND MY AXE! Or  my Saber. Whichever works better...

Signing up!


What is this... "Axe"?

(::)'s to you and other fellow operatives.

#98
FrozenPhoenix71

FrozenPhoenix71
  • Members
  • 60 messages
You know it....it wasn't too long ago. Feels just like yesterday actually. I...I would decide to say screw my status quo and go do a few games of Gold or Platinum. And through it all, I never trusted anyone more than my Geth Infiltrator, Yami. And he....he loved his Krysae. It was an efficient model. But....-fights back tears-...but you...you people took his love away from him! That unit had a soul! He would finally deliver retribution on groups of Geth Pyros and Hunters for their cheap stunlock by giving them the same! And you know what you did? You gave the heretics an easy way out! This unit did not deserve its death, but that is what you caused! You took the option to destroy, but not the heretics, nor all synthetic life, instead you destroyed us! And now......now....you have the AUDACITY to say this is balance?! You are aiding the enemies in a universal war! You all are traitors! Yami and I will not stand for traitors. So help me, we will rain down our retribution, no longer on the stunlocking Pyros or Hunters, no, but on you all! But because of your complaints and traitorous actions, we can no longer use of wrath in our favorite sniper rifle. No.....no. But we will have vengeance. We will stroke down with our lightning cannon, shredding your pathetic shields and barriers with no true heart behind them! You will feel my Reegar, and when you betray us again, then we will give you all the Proxiity Mines I can dish out. And when you prove traitorous again, I will curse you all with my energy field. And if you shame yourself once more by reducing the strength of your allies, then the wrath you feel will be the wrath of every unit you have betrayed. We are legion, for we are many. We are the true, the loyal, the brave. You are the traitors and the snakes in the grass. Yami is the darkness that you should be afraid of.

#99
Capt Beans

Capt Beans
  • Members
  • 175 messages

FrozenPhoenix71 wrote...

You know it....it wasn't too long ago. Feels just like yesterday actually. I...I would decide to say screw my status quo and go do a few games of Gold or Platinum. And through it all, I never trusted anyone more than my Geth Infiltrator, Yami. And he....he loved his Krysae. It was an efficient model. But....-fights back tears-...but you...you people took his love away from him! That unit had a soul! He would finally deliver retribution on groups of Geth Pyros and Hunters for their cheap stunlock by giving them the same! And you know what you did? You gave the heretics an easy way out! This unit did not deserve its death, but that is what you caused! You took the option to destroy, but not the heretics, nor all synthetic life, instead you destroyed us! And now......now....you have the AUDACITY to say this is balance?! You are aiding the enemies in a universal war! You all are traitors! Yami and I will not stand for traitors. So help me, we will rain down our retribution, no longer on the stunlocking Pyros or Hunters, no, but on you all! But because of your complaints and traitorous actions, we can no longer use of wrath in our favorite sniper rifle. No.....no. But we will have vengeance. We will stroke down with our lightning cannon, shredding your pathetic shields and barriers with no true heart behind them! You will feel my Reegar, and when you betray us again, then we will give you all the Proxiity Mines I can dish out. And when you prove traitorous again, I will curse you all with my energy field. And if you shame yourself once more by reducing the strength of your allies, then the wrath you feel will be the wrath of every unit you have betrayed. We are legion, for we are many. We are the true, the loyal, the brave. You are the traitors and the snakes in the grass. Yami is the darkness that you should be afraid of.


/Tear rolls down cheek

#100
Chimera1

Chimera1
  • Members
  • 137 messages

Grogimus wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Asebstos wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

I, at
least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to
strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary
in the future.

Apparently you can't. Or, at least, you can't respond without including a thinly veiled insult.


When confronted with a belligerent post, I responded by pointing out the irony of the post. Thus, I succeeded in achieving the rare double irony! It was not actually an attempt at insulting the poster, but instead an attempt at defending myself from his attack. Results can't lie. Apologies for insulting the poster if it was taken that way.

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Chimera1 wrote...

Grogimus wrote...

Interesting.....looking back over the last 25 pages of threads, I counted two nerf threads.  One was made a month ago.  There are several 'nerf' threads made in parody.  There were also five buff threads. 


You should read more threads. Some of the titles are misleading. Dozens of weapon and character nerf requests/discussions in the first three pages.


No...I think it's you that should read more carefully.  Dozens?!  Of legitimate calls for nerfing?  You're either dillusional or ignorant. 


Legitimate calls for nerfing... Are you then throwing out the /discussion part of my response? The threads just trying to start a debate for the lulz? Those threads which then got derailed into nerfing threads? All the trolling which lead to serious bites?

I, at least, can respond without throwing an insult out as an attempt to strengthen my point. You might want to use spell check and a dictionary in the future.


I've read every thread in this section of the forums for a month or more.  Most 'nerf' threads are nothing more than nonsense joke threads.  Very few threads are legitimate calls for a nerf.  On the contrary, far more threads say 'buff this'. 

Even in cases where the thread was a joke, those who 'sincerely' call for a nerf are being sarcastic or just trolling.  If you can't differentiate, then yes, you are either ignorant or delusional.  There, fixed the spelling for you. 


If someone starts a troll thread or a parody thread and that thread is then responded to by people legitimately calling for nerfs, it has been derailed and those responses are calls for nerfing.


I've moved on.  Can you?


Damn....I feel the need to expound.  I've made my point, and you've made yours.  We disagree.  Simple as that.  For my part, I'm done. 


*Gentleman's handshake* =] FWIW, just a debate. You have valid points, just trying to call attention to the results of the threads.

And now, on to the business of the NCN! ;)