277 réponses à ce sujet

[I am Sovereign]

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

[satunnainen]

Maybe Ill finish it one day, so far at 10 hours of gameplay and bored to death. Nice views still at some places.

[I am Sovereign]

satunnainen wrote...

Maybe Ill finish it one day, so far at 10 hours of gameplay and bored to death. Nice views still at some places.

Bored? Of Skyrim after 10 hours? IMPOSSIBRU

[Transairion]

Finding your way in ME3 is a lot easier than Skyrim, though. I get lost every 5 seconds in Skyrim, and it took me a while to relise that horse-and-cart man can actually take you to places you haven't been yet.

I literally walked to 3/4 of the major capitals, LOL WHAT A NOOB I AM :3

[Marauder Shieldz]

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Only thing Skyrim / Fallout lacks are decent characters and Romance. Apart from that, they are superior to ME3 in every way.

[Pitznik]

I tried really hard to like Morrowind. Then I tried really hard to like Oblivion. That model of gameplay just isn't made for me. If you like it, more power to you, have fun.

[Soultaker08]

I finished skyrim and.... NO pls

Skyrim sucks really hard, the different plots are way too short, most chars are underdeveloped,

i dont care how great a world is and how many different possibilities there are if you finish every arc after 2-3 hours, just to change to the next one...

[fchopin]

Maybe skyrim is a better game but i could only play about 5 or 6 hours before i was bored so stopped playing the game.

[I am Sovereign]

Marauder Shieldz wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Only thing Skyrim / Fallout lacks are decent characters and Romance. Apart from that, they are superior to ME3 in every way.

I'll give you that, but the romances in ME3 for ME2 characters were pretty terrible.

[AbnormalJoe]

The one of the few things that has Skyrim well above ME3 is one thing; radient quests. They should've added that for SP ME3. Makes the game less boring for those who can't play MP.

Edit: why couldn't they make fetch quest have action in them (like getting war assets and salvage kinda fetch)? That alone would've added like 30 more missions alone.

Modifié par AbnormalJoe, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:29 .

[AsheraII]

There's definitely less bugs in ME3. But then, I don't care much for Skyrim anyway. It's a faint echo of what Daggerfall was, which showed the potential of computergaming, rather than just repeating old tricks and hide it under a layer of HD textures so people won't notice that the game just got smaller and more restricted instead of opening up all that potential.

[macrocarl]

Marauder Shieldz wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Only thing Skyrim / Fallout lacks are decent characters and Romance. Apart from that, they are superior to ME3 in every way.

Actually, those 2 things are what I want in an RPG. Plus a great and surprising story. Like or hate the ned fo ME3, you got to admit you were surprised!

[I am Sovereign]

Soultaker08 wrote...

I finished skyrim and.... NO pls

Skyrim sucks really hard, the different plots are way too short, most chars are underdeveloped,

i dont care how great a world is and how many different possibilities there are if you finish every arc after 2-3 hours, just to change to the next one...

Modifié par I am Sovereign, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:30 .

[Gibb_Shepard]

YAWN. Skyrim is a shallow sandpit.

"OMFG look at all this sand! Let's see how dee- *clunk*....




oh.."

Modifié par Gibb_Shepard, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:28 .

[ForThessia]

Transairion wrote...

Finding your way in ME3 is a lot easier than Skyrim, though. I get lost every 5 seconds in Skyrim, and it took me a while to relise that horse-and-cart man can actually take you to places you haven't been yet.

I literally walked to 3/4 of the major capitals, LOL WHAT A NOOB I AM :3

well at least im not the only one who did that 

[I am Sovereign]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

YAWN. Skyrim is a shallow sandpit.

"OMFG look at all this sand! Let's see how dee- *clunk*....




oh.."

Yep, tell me all about how ME3 is a deep RPG experience...

[Marauder Shieldz]

I am Sovereign wrote...

Marauder Shieldz wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Only thing Skyrim / Fallout lacks are decent characters and Romance. Apart from that, they are superior to ME3 in every way.

I'll give you that, but the romances in ME3 for ME2 characters were pretty terrible.

Meh, i always enjoyed the romances. Liara in ME1, then Tali in ME2 and ME3. Then again, Tali's my favorite character. Although i noticed the romance in ME3 wasn't great. 

[Ageless Face]

Skyrim is a good game and all, but the plot and characters are boring as hell. To me it's pretty important.

Skyrim might be a better made game, but I like Mass Effect 3 more.

[Trentest0]

Skyrim is an example of a massive beautiful world with no depth. Mass Effect is the opposite: you're more constrained, but the depth is massive.

Your actions in Skryim mean NOTHING. They just change what the guards say to you. The world is very beautiful to explore though.

Though Skyrim is still a pretty good game, Mass effect any day.

[ScotGaymer]

Don't get me wrong, I love Skyrim, but you can't really compare it with games like Mass Effect and Dragon Age. You really can't.

Well I suppose you could, but if you did you would just be an idiot.

It's like comparing Apples and Oranges.

[Gibb_Shepard]

I am Sovereign wrote...

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

YAWN. Skyrim is a shallow sandpit.

"OMFG look at all this sand! Let's see how dee- *clunk*....




oh.."

Yep, tell me all about how ME3 is a deep RPG experience...

Well, it has a storyline for one. That adds like 100 depth points. It has actual character interaction +100 depth points. Gameplay that isn't woeful +50 depth points. Auto-dialogue -50 depth points.

Just as a game, Skyrim has width, but since there is no motivation to keep playing other than using your imagination to create sotrylines, it's boring as balls.

New Vegas on the other hand.... Obsidian should take Bethesda's job.

[I am Sovereign]

Trentest0 wrote...

Skyrim is an example of a massive beautiful world with no depth. Mass Effect is the opposite: you're more constrained, but the depth is massive.

Your actions in Skryim mean NOTHING. They just change what the guards say to you. The world is very beautiful to explore though.

Though Skyrim is still a pretty good game, Mass effect any day.

Please, tell me how Mass Effect 3's choices matter and how deep it is. Because the only things I noticed were the fact that the dialogue is slightly different if you choose the bottom right option instead of the top right option.

[Pitznik]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

Well, it has a storyline for one. That adds like 100 depth points. It has actual character interaction +100 depth points. Gameplay that isn't woeful +50 depth points. Auto-dialogue -50 depth points.

Just as a game, Skyrim has width, but since there is no motivation to keep playing other than using your imagination to create sotrylines, it's boring as balls.

New Vegas on the other hand.... Obsidian should take Bethesda's job.

I want Chris Avellone back in Bioware Black Isle Studios, working with Bioware:(

Modifié par Pitznik, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:37 .

[Conniving_Eagle]

ROFL @ TITLE.

Lol, I'm sorry but have you ever seen what people complain about on the Skyrim forums? I will agree though that Skyrim is a much better game than Mass Effect 3, with about 1,000 times more replayability.

[Conniving_Eagle]

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Actually, didn't Bioware even mention in some article that Skyrim was an amazing game and inspired them to take new directions with Dragon Age 3?