277 réponses à ce sujet

[KotorEffect3]

troll thread is troll thread. I love skyrim but take it to a forum about skyrim. This is just another mistaken fool that incorrectly hates ME 3.

[RustyMcBlade]

I play and enjoy both. Its funny how some people went on a crazy fanboy war lol

But still, ME is the better game here. The story, the characters, the action.. Hell, if the ending was better I could easily call it the greatest series of all time (hell, maybe still is!).

Modifié par RustyMcBlade, 26 juillet 2012 - 08:13 .

[KotorEffect3]

RustyMcBlade wrote...

I play and enjoy both. Its funny how some people went on a crazy fanboy war lol

But still, ME is the better game here. The story, the characters, the action.. Hell, if the ending was better I could easily call it the greatest series of all time (hell, maybe still is!).

+1

[JaceBelerin]

Generic Screen Name wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

I don't see how they can't be compared. Both are RPGs. If they were nominated for best RPG of the decade they would have to be compared in some way. To say they can't be seems silly.

ME3 is not an RPG.

Dafuq? I'm pretty sure the entire series is in the RPG genre.

[D24O]

RustyMcBlade wrote...

I play and enjoy both. Its funny how some people went on a crazy fanboy war lol

But still, ME is the better game here. The story, the characters, the action.. Hell, if the ending was better I could easily call it the greatest series of all time (hell, maybe still is!).

Yeah. ME is still my favorite video game series, even if I feel things could've been done better. And TES is probably my 2nd favorite, although I loved the deeper backstory of Vivec and the Tribunal in Morrowind, ME's setting and characters put it above TES for me.

[De1ta G]

JaceBelerin wrote...

Generic Screen Name wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

I don't see how they can't be compared. Both are RPGs. If they were nominated for best RPG of the decade they would have to be compared in some way. To say they can't be seems silly.

ME3 is not an RPG.

Dafuq? I'm pretty sure the entire series is in the RPG genre.

There are video game fanatics and extremists that believe that if the game doesn't include certain elements such as a  cluttered inventory system, bland exploration, bad combat, boring and tedious level grinding, etc. Then it isn't an RPG.

[ticklefist]

I play and enjoy both and get different things from each.Put me on an island and I'd take what Bethesda's given us this generation over Bioware.

[KotorEffect3]

JaceBelerin wrote...

Generic Screen Name wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

I don't see how they can't be compared. Both are RPGs. If they were nominated for best RPG of the decade they would have to be compared in some way. To say they can't be seems silly.

ME3 is not an RPG.

Dafuq? I'm pretty sure the entire series is in the RPG genre.

They might be both RPGs but bethesda and bioware both make very different types of games.  Not saying one is better than the other but bioware makes story driven games with squad based tactical combat while bethesda makes open world games with an emphasis on exploration and player freedom.  I like both of them but for different reasons.  I find it stupid when people complain that one isn't more like the other.

Modifié par KotorEffect3, 26 juillet 2012 - 08:22 .

[JaceBelerin]

De1ta G wrote...

There are video game fanatics and extremists that believe that if the game doesn't include certain elements such as a  cluttered inventory system, bland exploration, bad combat, boring and tedious level grinding, etc. Then it isn't an RPG.

Oh my...

[Anti-killer]

Story and Character wise, ME3 blows Skyrim out the water.

Exploration, Quest and Combat wise, Skyrim turns ME3 into ash, then burns the ashes for fun.

[ticklefist]

De1ta G wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

Generic Screen Name wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

I don't see how they can't be compared. Both are RPGs. If they were nominated for best RPG of the decade they would have to be compared in some way. To say they can't be seems silly.

ME3 is not an RPG.

Dafuq? I'm pretty sure the entire series is in the RPG genre.

There are video game fanatics and extremists that believe that if the game doesn't include certain elements such as a  cluttered inventory system, bland exploration, bad combat, boring and tedious level grinding, etc. Then it isn't an RPG.

Be fair. On the flip side of that coin are people that think if you play the "role" of a character in a game then you're playing a Role Playing Game. That's not how it works.

[KotorEffect3]

Anti-killer wrote...

Story and Character wise, ME3 blows Skyrim out the water.

Exploration, Quest and Combat wise, Skyrim turns ME3 into ash, then burns the ashes for fun.

I would put ME 3's combat over skyrim's

[JaceBelerin]

KotorEffect3 wrote...

They might be both RPGs but bethesda and bioware both make very different types of games.  Not saying one is better than the other but bioware makes story driven games with squad based tactical combat while bethesdah makes open world games with an emphasis on exploration and player freedom.  I like both of them but for different reasons.  I find it stupid when people complain that one isn't more like the other.

I understand that you'd not like to hear the endless back and forth about what one did better than the other, but for people to say they can't be compared...it just doesn't compute with me.

[JaceBelerin]

ticklefist wrote...

Be fair. On the flip side of that coin are people that think if you play the "role" of a character in a game then you're playing a Role Playing Game. That's not how it works.

I think that's exactly how it works...

http://en.wikipedia....le-playing_game 

[DRTJR]

Marauder Shieldz wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

 How could Bioware look at an amazing RPG experience like Skyrim, which was released November 2011, look at ME3 while it was finished with it's lazily thrown together story, and think "This'll do!"? And then release it in March 2012.

One would think that Skyrim would show Bioware that an amazing single player is what people want, not a hastily thrown together mess. The only reason for playing it more than once is the Multiplayer, a standard survival challenge mode. If I wanted to play that, I would play GOW3.

Skyrim > ME3 in EVERY way.

Oh, and when people were complaining that Fallout 3 had a crappy ending, Bethesda said "Ok, we'll change it so your character lives, no problem." Why is that so difficult for you, Bioware?

Only thing Skyrim / Fallout lacks are decent characters and Romance. Apart from that, they are superior to ME3 in every way.

Fallout:New Vegas would like to disagree.

ME3 is [for the most part] a compelling stories, also there are no Quarians in skyrim, thus it is inferior.

[De1ta G]

Anti-killer wrote...

Story and Character wise, ME3 blows Skyrim out the water.

Exploration, Quest and Combat wise, Skyrim turns ME3 into ash, then burns the ashes for fun.

You like Skyrims combat more than ME 3s? You can slash a bear in the face over and over while the bear is hurting you at the same time!

[xsdob]

RustyMcBlade wrote...

I play and enjoy both. Its funny how some people went on a crazy fanboy war lol

But still, ME is the better game here. The story, the characters, the action.. Hell, if the ending was better I could easily call it the greatest series of all time (hell, maybe still is!).

I like this guy, he makes sense.

[Anti-killer]

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Anti-killer wrote...

Story and Character wise, ME3 blows Skyrim out the water.

Exploration, Quest and Combat wise, Skyrim turns ME3 into ash, then burns the ashes for fun.

I would put ME 3's combat over skyrim's

Eh, Skyrim's combat can be fun sometimes, but the Finishers can be glitchy as hell. not to mention the damn Giants....

[KotorEffect3]

JaceBelerin wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

They might be both RPGs but bethesda and bioware both make very different types of games.  Not saying one is better than the other but bioware makes story driven games with squad based tactical combat while bethesdah makes open world games with an emphasis on exploration and player freedom.  I like both of them but for different reasons.  I find it stupid when people complain that one isn't more like the other.

I understand that you'd not like to hear the endless back and forth about what one did better than the other, but for people to say they can't be compared...it just doesn't compute with me.

It's not the back and forth it's the fact that it is an apples and oranges comparison.  If you forget about the rpg label for a minute and just look at both series they aren't really comparable.  Besides if I was going to compare bioware and bethesda series with each other I would compare the DA series and the TES series since at least setting and lore wise they are comparible.  DA is at least swords and sorcery like TES is.  ME is a sci-fi series that combines shooter and rpg elements.

[De1ta G]

ticklefist wrote...

De1ta G wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

Generic Screen Name wrote...

JaceBelerin wrote...

I don't see how they can't be compared. Both are RPGs. If they were nominated for best RPG of the decade they would have to be compared in some way. To say they can't be seems silly.

ME3 is not an RPG.

Dafuq? I'm pretty sure the entire series is in the RPG genre.

There are video game fanatics and extremists that believe that if the game doesn't include certain elements such as a  cluttered inventory system, bland exploration, bad combat, boring and tedious level grinding, etc. Then it isn't an RPG.

Be fair. On the flip side of that coin are people that think if you play the "role" of a character in a game then you're playing a Role Playing Game. That's not how it works.

I think it has more to do with decision making than anything. As long as you get to choose what kind of person your going to role play. You get to choose what you look like. You get to choose what you level up. You can't to make decisions that effect the game. Etc. Then it's a RPG.

[KotorEffect3]

Anti-killer wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

Anti-killer wrote...

Story and Character wise, ME3 blows Skyrim out the water.

Exploration, Quest and Combat wise, Skyrim turns ME3 into ash, then burns the ashes for fun.

I would put ME 3's combat over skyrim's

Eh, Skyrim's combat can be fun sometimes, but the Finishers can be glitchy as hell. not to mention the damn Giants....

I am not denying that Skyrim's combat is fun because it can be very fun.  But overall I prefer ME's combat.  Just more fun for me.

[AtreiyaN7]

Oh good God, here's another Skyrim thread. I love the game, but it's not the be-all and end-all in RPGs. As much as I like it, I haven't been motivated to finish it, and I only have a few main quests left. And having done almost everything that I can do in the game, I have zero interest in playing it again. From what I've read about Dawnguard, I'm not particularly inspired to purchase it right now.

Are we really going to have to get into the virtues of sandbox games and their limitations versus those games with smaller game worlds but richer stories and emotional content again? *rolleyes* Actually, I won't, because this thread falls into my brand new "banal, boring and repetitive thread that I've seen a million times by now" category.

[KotorEffect3]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

KotorEffect3 wrote...

It's not the back and forth it's the fact that it is an apples and oranges comparison.

I like apples more than oranges.

Maybe but that doesn't mean that the oranges have to be like apples.  Some people prefer oranges