277 réponses à ce sujet

[RavenEyry]

The story is better in Skyrim, but really the two games are incomparable. Both being RPGs doesn't mean they should stand up to each other.

I like Skyrim by the way, but I didn't love it more than breathing or anything like some people.

[I am Sovereign]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

YAWN. Skyrim is a shallow sandpit.

"OMFG look at all this sand! Let's see how dee- *clunk*....




oh.."

Yep, tell me all about how ME3 is a deep RPG experience...

Well, it has a storyline for one. That adds like 100 depth points. It has actual character interaction +100 depth points. Gameplay that isn't woeful +50 depth points. Auto-dialogue -50 depth points.

Just as a game, Skyrim has width, but since there is no motivation to keep playing other than using your imagination to create sotrylines, it's boring as balls.

New Vegas on the other hand.... Obsidian should take Bethesda's job.

Ok, now I KNOW you can't be serious.

[FlamingBoy]

not sure if skyrim is a fair comparison (was not a big fan of the game)

but yeah skyrim was better, not to mention did not break your hear through sheer mediocrity

[Conniving_Eagle]

Yeah, here it is www.wired.com/gamelife/2011/12/dragon-age-3/

It's a shame they didn't do it for ME3.

[frostajulie]

Skyrim offers 0 emotional connection to a sterle beautiful world. It has epic speeches that if delivered as citscenes would have significantly added to the emotional experience. That game as beautiful as it is is boring as hell. Even ME3 with all its flaws is a better game than Skyrim.

I don't give a crap about anything in Skyrim or anyone the entire time I play it. ME3 has me emotionally invested from the second the game starts If all games were like Skyrim I would not play games because they would be boring.

ME3 with all its flaws is still a more emotionally engaging and satisfying experience and thats because of the characters you grow to love and the story that begins to matter to you.

[Conniving_Eagle]

I wonder, is the Dragonborn a Deus Ex Machina?

Modifié par Conniving_Eagle, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:41 .

[Herr Igor]

Skyrim is a proper RPG while ME3 is just another multiplayer focused title...

[Conniving_Eagle]

frostajulie wrote...

Skyrim offers 0 emotional connection to a sterle beautiful world. It has epic speeches that if delivered as citscenes would have significantly added to the emotional experience. That game as beautiful as it is is boring as hell. Even ME3 with all its flaws is a better game than Skyrim.

I don't give a crap about anything in Skyrim or anyone the entire time I play it. ME3 has me emotionally invested from the second the game starts If all games were like Skyrim I would not play games because they would be boring.

ME3 with all its flaws is still a more emotionally engaging and satisfying experience and thats because of the characters you grow to love and the story that begins to matter to you.

With all due respect, I don't think people play Skyrim for an emotional and cinematic pay off. It is a very different game with its own strengths. This is the equivalent of an FPS fan saying they don't like Skyrim because it doesn't offer the same experience as an FPS.

[I am Sovereign]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

I wonder, is the Dragonborn a Deus Ex Machina?

He wasn't hastily introduced at the end of the story to resolve the central conflict, so no.

[Volatile Device]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...



New Vegas on the other hand.... Obsidian should take Bethesda's job.

No thanks, I'm fine playing a game that doesn't freeze every other loading screen.

Herr Igor wrote...

Skyrim is a proper RPG while ME3 is just another multiplayer focused title...

Having Multiplayer =/= Focused on Multiplayer

Modifié par Volatile Device, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:45 .

[SSPBOURNE]

I don't like Skyrim. The combat is dull, the dungeons are mostly repetitive, with the voice acting and NPC AI is a bag of bricks, and there's no moral choice system, like there is in most RPG's. I just couldn't find myself to love it, like I did with Oblivion and Fallout 3. (One of my most favorite games of all time.)
I've played Mass Effect a lot more.

[I am Sovereign]

Herr Igor wrote...

Skyrim is a proper RPG while ME3 is just another multiplayer focused title...

Someone with sense.

[Ageless Face]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

I wonder, is the Dragonborn a Deus Ex Machina?

Well, that dragon coming out of nowhere to rescue the dragonborn at the first five minutes of the game is kind of a Deus Ex Machina. At least I think it is. Don't know about the dragonborn him/herself though... 

Modifié par HagarIshay, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:47 .

[Newnation]

Skyrim to me was one of the most overrated games to come out. The story and characters are boring and forgettable. Some of the side quests also left you with wtf moments. The only thing Skyrim has on ME 3 is the open world, amount of involvement in side quests, and things you could do and even then crafting, blacksmithing, and enchanting doesn't fit into the ME universe.

[RavenEyry]

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

Just as a game, Skyrim has width, but since there is no motivation to keep playing other than using your imagination to create sotrylines, it's boring as balls.

Width but not depth, I like that. I've been trying to find an explanation for why I don't like Skyrim as much as a lot of people and that may be it.

[I am Sovereign]

Volatile Device wrote...

Gibb_Shepard wrote...



New Vegas on the other hand.... Obsidian should take Bethesda's job.

No thanks, I'm fine playing a game that doesn't freeze every other loading screen.

My thoughts exactly.

[AlexPorto111]

No.

[vurtual3]

ME3 owns Skyrim.

[Mims]

Skyrim is fun. But I don't really care about it. If Final Fantasy is what happens when artists direct a game, skyrim is what happens when programmers direct a game. It has no heart. Not a bad game by any stretch, but to say its flawless is just silly. If Skyrim had 10 actually realized characters in the game, it would be a miracle.

ME3 had its own problems of course, I wouldn't say it was better than Skyrim. [Especially considering their take is quite different.] But I'd take bioware's **** ending than an entire game that I just feel nothing for.

Modifié par Mims, 26 juillet 2012 - 02:48 .

[MB957]

I enjoy playing skyrim, but for a bit of different reasons than ME3.

ME3, to me, has more story and character development, (as with ME1 and 2).

skyrim has more exploration.

I would prefer a hybrid of the two games. exploration and interaction as in skyrim( ie making potions and smithing etc) with the full on character interaction and storytelling of the ME and DA style.

I think I may just start my own game company!

[Discouraged_one]

Apples and Oranges. Or is everyone here 13!?

[I am Sovereign]

SSPBOURNE wrote...

I don't like Skyrim. The combat is dull, the dungeons are mostly repetitive, with the voice acting and NPC AI is a bag of bricks, and there's no moral choice system, like there is in most RPG's.

[I am Sovereign]

vurtual3 wrote...

Skyrim owns ME3.

Fix'd it for you. 

[dorktainian]

vurtual3 wrote...

ME3 owns Skyrim.

seriously...you are joking......

Me3 aint an RPG at all.  It's a shooter.  Choices are linear.  Exploration is Linear. Yeah the universe itself might look pretty but exploration...... is non existant.