277 réponses à ce sujet

[Herr Igor]

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

[AxStapleton]

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

[I am Sovereign]

AxStapleton wrote...

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

Skyrim is still a better game than ME3. No matter which way you compare it.

[K2LU533]

No

[De1ta G]

I am Sovereign wrote...

AxStapleton wrote...

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

Skyrim is still a better game than ME3. No matter which way you compare it.

Get over yourself. 

[K2LU533]

Skyrim's story is average at best, the appeal of Skyrim is the large freeroaming world and many side missions.

[Herr Igor]

AxStapleton wrote...

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

Just goes to show that you have NO idea what so ever of what a RPG is.

Is ME3 a RPG? WHY IS THAT EXACTLY? Because it has some lines of dialogue? Because "because"?

Puff... go play some multiplayer.

[Conniving_Eagle]

While I agree with you, Sovereign, you make yourself out to be a fanboy...

[Sundance31us]

I am Sovereign wrote...

Wolves are very rare to fight outside cities after like level 15, they like woods, suprisingly.

Riding a horse city to city attracts constant wolves and the occational sabre cat if you go through the mountains.

[Fauxnormal]

Oh FFs. this isn't even worth dignifying with a proper reply.

Go away, fanboy.

[Fiery Phoenix]

Comparing Skyrim with ME3 makes Sovereign a dull boy.

[I am Sovereign]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

While I agree with you, Sovereign, you make yourself out to be a fanboy...

I'm not at all, i've only played Skyrim, Fallout 3 and New Vegas. ME3 pissed me off because I loved the series so much and Bioware did a half-assed job. At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

[Sundance31us]

I am Sovereign wrote...
At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

If I remember correctly there were some game breaking glitches when it was released.

[Conniving_Eagle]

I am Sovereign wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

While I agree with you, Sovereign, you make yourself out to be a fanboy...

I'm not at all, i've only played Skyrim, Fallout 3 and New Vegas. ME3 pissed me off because I loved the series so much and Bioware did a half-assed job. At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

Well, as a long time Elder Scrolls fan, even Skyrim falls short in certain aspects. It's not even in the same league of disappointment as Mass Effect 3. Sorry I called you a fanboy, there just seems to be a lot of arguing in this topic.

[AxStapleton]

I am Sovereign wrote...

AxStapleton wrote...

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

Skyrim is still a better game than ME3. No matter which way you compare it.

I'm indifferent to Skyrim personally, its very good but its not my taste of game. ME2 remains my personal favourite game whereas ME3 is much lower on my list.

[I am Sovereign]

Fauxnormal wrote...

Oh FFs. this isn't even worth dignifying with a proper reply.

Go away, fanboy.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Sundance31us wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...
At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

If I remember correctly there were some game breaking glitches when it was released.

Maybe for some people. I for one was blessed with a Daedric copy of the game. The only glitches I have ever run into in my +350 hours were freezing loading screens on characters with +50 hours on them.

[Conniving_Eagle]

Skyrim is one of my favorite games, as is Mass Effect 2.

[Ledgend1221]

Skyrim is a terrible RPG.
The poor story, characters and dialogue and its horrible combat makes it nothing more than a stain on TES series. So much content had been removed and the game was simplified far too much from previous Elder scrolls. Beth needs to learn from Morrowind and Fallout NV.
I dread to think what fallout 4 will be like.

[OGWS]

Banul wrote...

As someone who has played both games for more time then I'd care to admit, you can't really compare them. Its two completely different experiences. Apples and oranges.

Exactly this

[AxStapleton]

Herr Igor wrote...

AxStapleton wrote...

Herr Igor wrote...

sharkboy421 wrote...

It's kinda hard to compare the games because they are from different styles of rpg.  ME originated as very story focused and character driven while Skyrim and the rest of the ES was an open world game.  The two styles focus on different aspects of the rpg and the result is two very different games.  It does not make one style better than the other, just different.

As it has been said here, it all comes down to personal preference.  I personally like story and character driven games more than open world, but I have enjoyed both types of games.  Skyrim does some things better than ME and ME does other things better.  Both are still good games.

NONSENSE...

RPG is RPG. And ME3 is as much a RPG as Call of Duty is one.

A childish response. Saying an RPG is an RPG is saying that Skyrim is the exact same kind of game that Pokemon is. They are both technically RPG's.

Just goes to show that you have NO idea what so ever of what a RPG is.

Is ME3 a RPG? WHY IS THAT EXACTLY? Because it has some lines of dialogue? Because "because"?

Puff... go play some multiplayer.

Excuse me? I wasn't even talking about ME3. I was talking about your flawed logic in RPG's just being one exact unchangeable genre.

[I am Sovereign]

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

While I agree with you, Sovereign, you make yourself out to be a fanboy...

I'm not at all, i've only played Skyrim, Fallout 3 and New Vegas. ME3 pissed me off because I loved the series so much and Bioware did a half-assed job. At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

Well, as a long time Elder Scrolls fan, even Skyrim falls short in certain aspects. It's not even in the same league of disappointment as Mass Effect 3. Sorry I called you a fanboy, there just seems to be a lot of arguing in this topic.

It's cool, I know compared to other Bethesda games Skyrim was dumbed down, but it's the same kind of simplifying that made ME2 better than ME1. At least IMO.

[Conniving_Eagle]

I am Sovereign wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

I am Sovereign wrote...

Conniving_Eagle wrote...

While I agree with you, Sovereign, you make yourself out to be a fanboy...

I'm not at all, i've only played Skyrim, Fallout 3 and New Vegas. ME3 pissed me off because I loved the series so much and Bioware did a half-assed job. At least Bethesda wait until a game is ready before they release it.

Well, as a long time Elder Scrolls fan, even Skyrim falls short in certain aspects. It's not even in the same league of disappointment as Mass Effect 3. Sorry I called you a fanboy, there just seems to be a lot of arguing in this topic.

It's cool, I know compared to other Bethesda games Skyrim was dumbed down, but it's the same kind of simplifying that made ME2 better than ME1. At least IMO.

I agree. Skyrim is essentially Oblivion 2.0, which isn't a bad thing. I really like the game. Although it would be nice if we could see some of the RPG aspects from Morrowind return.