but my point is better and more specific.
Ashley Williams is a conservative and slightly racist in the first Mass effect.
Kadian is more liberal and more into other species existance.
From a moral standpoint Cerberus is also conservative, therefore Ashley Williams would fit right in. However the flipside (which bioware chose to do instead) is that a conservative like Ashley would also have high pride for the alliance.
To Williams Cerberus is a terrorist organization. However their worldviews fit in line with hers very well. The only thing that I think keeps Williams away from Cerberus is because they are simply not the alliance and she has a lot of loyalty. She has a lot of blind loyalist national pride and is proud to be alliance, but the raw truth is her ideals are basically the illusive mans ideals.
I think her charecter was spot on in remaining with the alliance in ME2 simply because of her conservative national pride, however her ideals themselves never were addressed in depth after ME1. The fact that had she wound up in Cerbrus in the first place, that she would of been the perfect operative is never brought up.
Kaidan however does not mesh with Cerbrus ideals. His ideals are more liberal. However I could see him leaving the alliance to work with Shepard if the need be, but not to join Cerbrus because of what they beleive in.
Kaidans reasons for not joining shepard are better than ashleys then because Kaidan doesnt join up in ME2 because he disagrees with the viewpoint of the group Shepard is working for. Ashley does agree with the viewpoint (perhaps not their methods) and simply does not like them because they are not the alliance.
Modifié par Jawsomebob, 27 juillet 2012 - 04:57 .





Retour en haut






