MisterJB wrote...
The Qunari cultures does have its appeals but I do agree their treatment of mages goes beyond caution.
Or do you mean to imply the Circle systems is based on a warped sense of caring?
I meant to say that I find the Qunari method to be based on a warped sense of caring, which makes it not as bad as what the Chantry does. It's bad certainly and I don't want it done, but I can at least defend it because the Qunari themselves don't have the same abuse of Mages that the Chantry controlled Circles do.
It's my personal interpretation and most posters disagree with it, finding what they do to be simply an abhorrent crime.
And maybe it is. But I've seen nothing really to indicate it being just that and I do believe my interpretation is right. It's abhorrent certainly, but I wouldn't say that's all it is. I'd say that what they do stems from a deeper level of emotions and feelings and whatnot.
Not of hatred, but of respect and caring.
EDIT: fixed some grammar issues and clarified a bit more.
MisterJB wrote...
I agree that mages should be barred from political power but, would mundanes be able to stop them if mages are given more freedoms? They are born with a very real power.
If the Templar Order is sufficiently reformed -- and depending on what happens with the whole "More mages being born" schtick -- then yes, the Mages could easily be stopped by mundanes.
Having more freedoms doesn't mean a new Imperium will automatically rise. That's a possibility, but it'd take a crapton of mages to pull it off or a select few being very good at what they do and able to remain hidden from notice.
Which... isn't easily done.
Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 31 juillet 2012 - 06:45 .





Retour en haut







