The Mad Hanar wrote...
Point is, any game can seem bad with the right amount of nit picking.
That's true of so many things that it doesn't really say anything.
What matters is this: Mass Effect 3 received abnormally huge criticism for its conclusion. There's a reason for that, and it's not just that a group of people got together and started nit-picking. I mean, I know we've got the internet, but it's not
that powerful (yet?)

Mr.Spo wrote...
Of course a game that came out five years ago--and was Bioware's first entry in the Mass Effect franchise and
first game developed on current generation hardware--is going to have issues. Is it acceptable that after five years of extra development experience, with Mass Effect 2's accomplishments, that Bioware come out with Mass Effect 3 as it is?
To me, it isn't. Sure, Mass Effect 1
had issues, but that doesn't excuse or negate the issues with Mass Effect 3. If anything, it makes them less excusable. It's a good game, but it's nowhere near the game it could have been. Poor combat in Mass Effect 1 doesn't make fetch quests or plot holes in Mass Effect 3 excusable.
Favourite post in this thread!

(so far)
txgoldrush wrote...
Vigil is a Deus Ex Machina......
Figures, its ME1, it doesn't count, its only "bad" in ME3.
Completely different contexts.
Modifié par Ajensis, 29 juillet 2012 - 06:15 .