Isichar wrote...
maaaze wrote...
Isichar wrote...
OP likes his headcanon.
I have evidence for this.
the fact that Shaperd was able to open the arms.
the fact that the reapers are independent from another (ranoch reaper :"harbinger told me of you")
The fact that he can´t make the choices happen.
I like to hear your evidence that this is not the case.
The problem I have (and I am fairly certain at this point you will treat anything I say with hostility but...) is that none of that is actual proof that the catalyst has no control over anything. I Dont really see the point of arguing because I dont necessarily think you are wrong. Why?
Example: Shepard could have opened the arms because the Catalyst allowed him too. Whether or not you believe this is not important, its still possible and thus you cannot claim your argument is "fact".
I asked when the game directly addresses the Catalysts exact abilitys, and the answer is it does not.
Same thing with how you address the beam shutting off in refuse, your passing your speculations and assumptions off as fact when they are not.
Well if the Catalyst allowed him to open the arms the following statement would make no sense :
"you standing here, the first organic ever, proves that my solution won´t work anymore."
If him standing there was caused through the Catalyst...it would not prove anything.
It does say of what the Catalyst is not able to do : activating the catalyst.
It does show you of what the Catalyst is not able to do : controling the Citadel.
Let me ask you this : why do you believe the Catalyst has power ? which statement or action did show you that he has?
If you say deactivating the beam?...it is not shown that he deactivets it...it is shown that it loses it´s power...because Shepard does nothing. and the reapers keep attacking.
"So be it" just says...okay you will not take action...the cycle than continues...and nothing has changed.