WARMACHINE9 wrote...
ntrisley wrote...
pisonmison wrote...
bioware doesnt know a **** about the game. they feel its to srong nerf it to the ground, 90% of players think its good, ignore them.
You have no clue what "nerfing to the ground" means. You really don't.
And just because the players "think it's good" does not mean that it's not overpowered. "90% of players" thought the Krysae was good when it was first beginning its Meatchunking World Tour with Rebellion.
Now the players who said it was "balanced" at the time are complaining because they no longer have their instawin gun, and instead actually have to utilize a modicum of tactics to use it to the best effect.
Actually I used the krysea about 3 times total(wasn't really my thing) and I think it's terrible they nerfed it into oblivion.
It is
far from "nerfed into oblivion". It is, however, in line with the rest of the sniper rifles now.
Which is to say, absolute bottom tier for weaponry.
I wouldn't say it was balanced but as some one pointed out its PvE not PvP(so if your complaining that something is OP there is a good chance your just butthurt because you were outscored by it and are missing the point of ME3 MP anyway).
I always love this line of "debate".
"If you complain about it, clearly you're just butthurt about being outscored by it!".
Nope.
I used it myself until I finally got a bloody Valiant I(because face facts here: sniper rifles are weak. They really are, and they were even before the TC nerf. The
only reason we saw the TC nerf is because of the Krysae. It did not, at all, change the way Shotgun Infiltrators functioned.), and since then have only taken it out to use on my Demolisher/Salarian Engineer as a "detonator" weapon with the proper ammunition.
Any idiot can score high with the Krysae. The fact that you saw Soldiers, Sentinels, Engineers, Adepts, and Vanguards running around with it--
in addition to Infiltrators!--should tell you that the gun was, in fact, too powerful. It was relatively lightweight, powerful, and required exactly no real "skill" to use in its first iteration. As the damage has gone down, the gun certainly has suffered but now when you see someone using it...they generally are using it much like the Falcon or Particle Rifle, and actually know what the heck they're doing with it.
Whenever a company "removes" some thing from a game by nerfing it( debuffing a weapon, class, power until it is not viable in game) it's really sad. I agree when a change makes you have to be more skilled to use something(TC anyone?) but that wasn't the case with the krysea and isn't the case with the typhoon.IMHO
You have exactly no clue what you're talking about. You really don't.
The fact that you think the "TC change makes you have to be more skilled to use it" is absurd and proof enough of this.
All it did was change people from using the Krysae to the Claymore.
Modifié par ntrisley, 30 juillet 2012 - 07:11 .
Retour en haut
![=]](https://lvlt.forum.bioware.com/public/style_emoticons/default/sideways.png)
