235 réponses à ce sujet

[Fixx21]

Wow this MP is headed toward it's end...It's LOL worthy that these same people release the gun that is "too strong" in the first place...How bout take away all of our guns and leave nothing but Avengers huh? That is the only "balance" this game will ever have[2]


This weapon is so good in the hands of soldiers Turian and N7 !
because it will hurt all other classes? As they did with krysae? Nerf infiltrator because of a gun?

[Kenadian]

Lividliver wrote...

Mr.House wrote...

Watch, they will get rid of the ability to pierce guardian shields and thin walls/cover and lower it's rate of fire.

I'm hoping they throw in more than that too.My suggestions would be for them to do reduced damage against barriers and shields.Maybe about a quarter of what they are dishing out right now.Phantom barrier should totally block out typhoon bullets too.That will make things harder and more fun.

Now you're just bitter about not having it. Lower the damage of a rapid fire weapon to shields and barriers? Lolwut?

[Thoragoros]

What?!?!

I've got a Typhoon 1 and a Revenant X...guess which is the better gun! Yeah, the Revenant, which was also about ten times easier to unlock, and doesn't destroy my cooldowns with massive weight. So should we also nerf the Revenant because it's beastly at rank 10?!?!

What reason could there be for nerfing an UR gun, that not only weighs a ton, but it is damn hard to unlock?

[exeviper]

this just shows bioware listens only to the minoraity of people, i have a typhoon grade 2 its a lovely weapon helps in gold matches alot, and tbh they're not too great in platinums theres no reason to nerf this weapon, just because a few angry people complaining they haven't got one. big whoop its an ultra rare and its damage shows that. if you nerf it then theres just basically no point to multiplayer cos it takes 20+ mins to do gold and plat runs i dont wanna use a weapon that makes it take longer for 1 damn game.a good weapon has come out yay.. oh lets nerf it :| pointless dont like it dont use it simple.

[Rifneno]

Jesus tapdancing Christ. How are these guys still employed? You couldn't keep a job at Burger King being this awful at your job. Did they make a deal with the devil or what?

[Thoragoros]

And maybe "They" feel its too powerful, but abouu the community that's actually using - and loving - the gun?

[skergx120]

I just got the damn thing last night...

[gilgamesh v9]

LennethValkyrie wrote...

''We're about to release five new powerful ultra super rare guns in the next dlc.. but hurry up to unlock them because after a week or two we'll turn the into super soakers..''

yup... getting sick of it. at least i got ONE day out of my piranha, more than i could say for other guns...

[WARMACHINE9]

I'm the idiot and don't know what I'm talking about but you believe the Krysea caused TC to be debuffed....RIGHT and santa clause and the easter bunny are real. The debuff to TC made itso headshots were more important, therefore adding a level of skill ot the equation. But why am I trying to explain this to you as your only going to call me an idiot because i disagree with you and use logic instead of space magic for my argument.

[adneate]

What's this!?! An Assault Rifle that doesn't suck?! It must be nerfed! All assault rifles must be garbage!

[Lividliver]

Kenadian wrote...


Now you're just bitter about not having it. Lower the damage of a rapid fire weapon to shields and barriers? Lolwut?

I be bitter that I admit but I don't mind since Bioware symphatizes with my feelings and those who share the same as well.Their actions so far reflect my sentiment so I know they are closely listening to me and my jolly band of green faced nerfers.Anyway,I have faith that Bio is doing what is best for all of us!Extra brownie points for me,hah!

Modifié par Lividliver, 30 juillet 2012 - 07:21 .

[T41rdEye]

Saw this coming a mile away. I try not too use OP weapons so this doesn't affect me much.

[ntrisley]

Thoragoros wrote...

And maybe "They" feel its too powerful, but abouu the community that's actually using - and loving - the gun?

The difference is they don't just "feel it's too powerful".

They actually have metrics which allow them to have information which they make their decisions based off of.

Anyone who thinks they base their decisions solely off the cesspool of "discussion" that is the MP forum is so laughably gullible that I could sell them the moon.

[BabyfaceAssassin]

adneate wrote...

What's this!?! An Assault Rifle that doesn't suck?! It must be nerfed! All assault rifles must be garbage!

Admiral Cain, you are my hero.
...but weekly nerfs are horrible.

Modifié par BabyfaceAssassin, 30 juillet 2012 - 07:36 .

[SeaJayX]

You dick around too much with the things that don't matter and eventually you end up ruining the whole thing.

That's the story of ME3 MP in a nutshell.


Let's screw with the new Ultra rare instead of fixing the 2 dozen obsolete classes.
Not enough manpower or not enough brainpower?

[GFOX7]

Well at least I got ahold of one and used it before the nerf bat came down. Unlike the Krysae.

[SR2O]

Why did you have to PM Fagnan pretty much asking for a nerf?

You people here at BSN make this game not fun. All you guys do is whine and complain about everything little thing.

God forbid we have two or three guns that aren't throwing marshmallows, least of all an Ultra Rare

[CptBomBom00]

cerberus1701 wrote...

CptBomBom00 wrote...

**** this, if this happens, then I might as well stop playing MP, and go to HMV and buy my self Max Payne 3 or something else, because what's the point of putting this gun into the MP as UR, when it will get nerfed anyway, and for me its the only weapon that's actually awesome, also like I've said few times here on forums what's the point of nerfing the weapons when this game is CO-OP not PVP??????????

I honestly believe this is done on purpose. A gun that's great...UR....fairly hard to get. After a while a fair number will pay to try for it. They do.

Then, mash gun into the Earth, so no one uses it (i.e. most ARs)

Fresh new DLC with new fun to play with UR...


Repeat.

Yeah, I agree, is BW trying to prove something by this nerf??? I honestly don't know, I'm getting sick of all the nerfing, how about for change they nerf Hurricane or Valiant? hmmm?<_<

[WARMACHINE9]

Lividliver wrote...

Kenadian wrote...


Now you're just bitter about not having it. Lower the damage of a rapid fire weapon to shields and barriers? Lolwut?

I be bitter that I admit but I don't mind since Bioware symphatizes with my feelings and those who share the same as well.Their actions so far reflect my sentiment so I know they are closely listening to me and my jolly band of green faced nerfers.Anyway,I have faith that Bio is doing what is the best for all of us!Extra brownie points for me,hah!

Troll troll troll your boat gently down the troll

[Lividliver]

WARMACHINE9 wrote...

Lividliver wrote...

Kenadian wrote...


Now you're just bitter about not having it. Lower the damage of a rapid fire weapon to shields and barriers? Lolwut?

I be bitter that I admit but I don't mind since Bioware symphatizes with my feelings and those who share the same as well.Their actions so far reflect my sentiment so I know they are closely listening to me and my jolly band of green faced nerfers.Anyway,I have faith that Bio is doing what is the best for all of us!Extra brownie points for me,hah!

Troll troll troll your boat gently down the troll

Call me whatever you like,as long as I get what I want at the end of the day(weapon be nerfed) and I will,i know Bioware is on my side and that is all that matters.

Modifié par Lividliver, 30 juillet 2012 - 07:23 .

[Rifneno]

ntrisley wrote...

Thoragoros wrote...

And maybe "They" feel its too powerful, but abouu the community that's actually using - and loving - the gun?

The difference is they don't just "feel it's too powerful".

They actually have metrics which allow them to have information which they make their decisions based off of.

Anyone who thinks they base their decisions solely off the cesspool of "discussion" that is the MP forum is so laughably gullible that I could sell them the moon.

And anyone who thinks they base their decisions off good solid statistical information, they must have such a keen understanding of mathematics that they think 2+2=tomato.

[Killmoves37]

SR2O wrote...

Why did you have to PM Fagnan pretty much asking for a nerf?

You people here at BSN make this game not fun. All you guys do is whine and complain about everything little thing.

God forbid we have two or three guns that aren't throwing marshmallows, least of all an Ultra Rare

Somebody didn't read past the first sentence

[FeralJester616]

Just when I was thinking that the AR need a buff in general so that they're more damaging than the heavy pistols, along came the harrier and the typhoon...

I still think they need a buff as the harrier is the only AR worth spit.... Not because its so amazing but because the rest are awful.

The typhoon is an LMG... Period.
LMG's are ment to have beast damage per round... Period.
If they nerf it at all they should only touch the recoil when not in cover....

[TenmaTaro]

Well, I can't miss what I never had.

[ntrisley]

Rifneno wrote...

ntrisley wrote...

Thoragoros wrote...

And maybe "They" feel its too powerful, but abouu the community that's actually using - and loving - the gun?

The difference is they don't just "feel it's too powerful".

They actually have metrics which allow them to have information which they make their decisions based off of.

Anyone who thinks they base their decisions solely off the cesspool of "discussion" that is the MP forum is so laughably gullible that I could sell them the moon.

And anyone who thinks they base their decisions off good solid statistical information, they must have such a keen understanding of mathematics that they think 2+2=tomato.

So what you're saying is that the answer is in fact tomato?

Hrmh. Here I was thinking it was four...

But anyways.
Just because a decision is contrary to what the general player population wants/believes is the "right" way to do it does not mean it is not supported by their data.