DoomsdayDevice wrote...
ivenoidea wrote...
Today i realized that people calling the Catalyst/Starchild a "Deus Ex Machina" are completely right.
Today this phrase means "sudden illogical solution to a problem", but translated properly from latin it means "God made from a machine."
Think about that for a moment.
Actually no, it literally means "God out of / from the machine", (not "made from") and even more accurately "God out of / from the crane".
In ancient Greek comedies and tragedies, whenever divine intervention was needed in the drama, they used a crane to lower a god onto the stage, as if he came floating down from Olympus itself.
I see your point, but it actually means that the god is coming from the machine, not made of it. 
That is why it can also be used to mean a 'fake god'.
Yep Doomsday's got it about Deus Ex Machina. It was something that happened in Greek plays to tie all the endings together, where a previously unseen character or other plot device appears, to intervene and resolve the otherwise unresolvable issues.
Just wanted to chime in and say that the StarChild is not a DEM, because
- he can't influence the decisions to be taken - Shepard ultimately makes the decision to use the catalyst (or not). The StarChild is unable to make this choice or do anything. He just explains, somewhat, the choices that Shepard has; and
- he is not a new element. Though in the form of a ghost child, he is previously unseen, he represents the collective intelligence of the Reapers, and we already knew about the Reapers - they are nothing new. It's just that this is the closest Shepard's come to being able to communicate with them.
The Crucible isn't a DEM either. It was mentioned throughout the ME3 plot, and we already knew that it would "...do... something..." to end the Reaper threat. We never knew exactly what it would do.