We can infer that the quarians are still mask-bound by the ending slides, thus implying that they lost the geth support for strengthening their immune systems.RavenEyry wrote...
Again, not necesarily. We only know for sure that EDI dies.Xilizhra wrote...
Deliberately taking an action that will destroy all geth. It is genocide.
Modifié par demersel, 02 octobre 2012 - 04:28 .
Home run MF wrote...
Maybe I'm lost but don't some people in this thread think the ending it's just a test and the Crucible didn't really fire? How can you argue about IT and dismiss one of its pillars?
demersel wrote...
Yes!!! They trew us a bone! New femshep wallpaper! No the similiar traces of re-entry in the sky to that other picture with shepard! And that is clearly London, baby!
that is the break of dawn over London!
Xilizhra wrote...
We can infer that the quarians are still mask-bound by the ending slides, thus implying that they lost the geth support for strengthening their immune systems.RavenEyry wrote...
Again, not necesarily. We only know for sure that EDI dies.Xilizhra wrote...
Deliberately taking an action that will destroy all geth. It is genocide.
Also, complain all you like about Synthesis, but that compendium thread has far less vicious, insulting dogmatism based wholly on fanon in it.
In wich one of those are we posting?BatmanTurian wrote...
Home run MF wrote...
Maybe I'm lost but don't some people in this thread think the ending it's just a test and the Crucible didn't really fire? How can you argue about IT and dismiss one of its pillars?
there are three different versions of IT that I'm aware of: IT-Dream, IT Waking-Nightmare, and IT-Con. On at least two of them, the crucible really does fire but what is believed is that what is presented to Shepard by a cyborg race that controls minds (created by a biological race that controls minds) isn't what actually happens.
demersel wrote...
Yes!!! They trew us a bone! New femshep wallpaper! No the similiar traces of re-entry in the sky to that other picture with shepard! And that is clearly London, baby!
that is the break of dawn over London!
RavenEyry wrote...
Again, not necesarily. We only know for sure that EDI dies.Xilizhra wrote...
Deliberately taking an action that will destroy all geth. It is genocide.
TSA_383 wrote...
demersel wrote...
Yes!!! They trew us a bone! New femshep wallpaper! No the similiar traces of re-entry in the sky to that other picture with shepard! And that is clearly London, baby!
that is the break of dawn over London!
No visible reapers, reapers (presumably) burning up in the atmosphere.
Looks like victory to me
demersel wrote...
By the way - there seems to be a second ghost layer in that picture - it is overimosed - you can see it in central area but the thing that gives it away is a fragment of a bridge-like construction in top right corner.
Really? And hear I thought the reapers only die in one-fourth of the endings...TSA_383 wrote...
No visible reapers, reapers (presumably) burning up in the atmosphere.
Looks like victory to me
Modifié par leonia42, 02 octobre 2012 - 04:37 .
BatmanTurian wrote...
It's also perfectly plausible that EDI's Dr Core body is what dies and not little EDI snug in her Quantum Blue Box. The destroy beam does not destroy all technology.
Then why would her name be placed on the memorial wall if she only lost one platform?BatmanTurian wrote...
RavenEyry wrote...
Again, not necesarily. We only know for sure that EDI dies.Xilizhra wrote...
Deliberately taking an action that will destroy all geth. It is genocide.
It's also perfectly plausible that EDI's Dr Core body is what dies and not little EDI snug in her Quantum Blue Box. The destroy beam does not destroy all technology.
Guest_Sareth Cousland_*
Xilizhra wrote...
My goal is to preserve life as much as possible. I will go with an ending that allows me to do so. That is, clearly, the hard choice.
Modifié par Sareth Cousland, 02 octobre 2012 - 04:38 .
ZerebusPrime wrote...
Demersel, how recent is that picture?
BatmanTurian wrote...
demersel wrote...
By the way - there seems to be a second ghost layer in that picture - it is overimosed - you can see it in central area but the thing that gives it away is a fragment of a bridge-like construction in top right corner.
Is that the back of the Conduit?
Home run MF wrote...
In wich one of those are we posting?BatmanTurian wrote...
Home run MF wrote...
Maybe I'm lost but don't some people in this thread think the ending it's just a test and the Crucible didn't really fire? How can you argue about IT and dismiss one of its pillars?
there are three different versions of IT that I'm aware of: IT-Dream, IT Waking-Nightmare, and IT-Con. On at least two of them, the crucible really does fire but what is believed is that what is presented to Shepard by a cyborg race that controls minds (created by a biological race that controls minds) isn't what actually happens.
With first the QR codes and now this, they sure like leaving hints on facebook...leonia42 wrote...
ZerebusPrime wrote...
Demersel, how recent is that picture?
Just went up on Facebook a little bit ago. Very hot-off-the-press.
demersel wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
It's also perfectly plausible that EDI's Dr Core body is what dies and not little EDI snug in her Quantum Blue Box. The destroy beam does not destroy all technology.
Except, that after transaction EDI is bound to that body (not entirely, but enough to be dependant on its existsance) - she tells you that in the first conversation after takeover.
Modifié par demersel, 02 octobre 2012 - 04:40 .
TSA_383 wrote...
With first the QR codes and now this, they sure like leaving hints on facebook...leonia42 wrote...
ZerebusPrime wrote...
Demersel, how recent is that picture?
Just went up on Facebook a little bit ago. Very hot-off-the-press.
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 02 octobre 2012 - 04:41 .
I have another Javik quote about the squadmate ones: "Do not concern yourself with what others think. Do what you must."Sareth Cousland wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
My goal is to preserve life as much as possible. I will go with an ending that allows me to do so. That is, clearly, the hard choice.
And that's commendable.
However, as Garrus said, "sometimes the unverse needs cold-hearted dictators". Garrus also says something about that the time may come when you need to decide whether one trillions will die so that two trillions can live. He also asks about whether you can pull the trigger. If you go the paragon route (which I did, and you probably as well), he says "a nice sentiment - let's hope we can live by it".
Add that to "we destroy them or they destroy us" (Anderson on control) / "that's like trying to tame a shark - somebody is going to end up dead. In this case, it would be the whole galaxy" (Hackett on control)
... and destroy remains. There are lots of anti-synthesis quotations on the preceding few pages as well; your squadmates have a LOT of quotes advocating destroy, while simultaneously dissuading you from control & synthesis.
Another advice, that one from Javik - "you still believe that you can end this war with your honor intact". You chose control because you could not sacrifice the geth & EDI. You retained your honor. You seek to preserve life as much as possible. But sometimes, the universe needs cold-hearted dictators, because a hard decision is needed so that two trillions can live at the expense of a third - instead of galactic annihilation if you fail to control the Reapers (Shepard says as much to TIM just minutes before, prior to the Catalyst shifting your attention from the main goal).
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut