Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#30376
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:01
#30377
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:08
But the biggest thing for me is that Vega destroys a Collector Ship...something that it took Shep getting a Thanix Cannon (or sacrificing some of the crew) to get done...and yet we never here about in ME 2!?! Wouldn't that be pretty big news to a crew that is looking for a way to stop the Collector's?
Edit: I guess everyone is playing MP for the OP...guess I could do that too.
Modifié par D.Sharrah, 05 octobre 2012 - 08:11 .
#30378
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:14
On the other hand, he never seemed like the techy guy.
Edit: Good idea, I'll do that too.
Modifié par Restrider, 05 octobre 2012 - 08:15 .
#30379
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:42
#30380
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 08:55
" - soldiers in Destroy fighting fiercly while that scene is missing in Control/Synthesis (on a side note: no cheering in Synthesis)"
Actually, that scene isn't missing in control/synth, the soldier in control/synth is being overcome by a husk and is about to die. In other words: he's losing. The soldier in destroy shoots that husk, and then some. In other words: winning.
Also: fiercely.
Also, I voted on that poll. Is it just one poll, or am I missing something?
Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 05 octobre 2012 - 08:58 .
#30381
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:04
They're talking about the citadel, but just read this with the ending in mind:
Vega: "It's... not right. It looks pretty... calm, and peaceful, but it's not right. It's all just an illusion."
(...)
"They'd rather believe this than face the truth."
Shepard: "I can hardly believe it myself. Like everything back on Earth was some kind of nightmare."
Vega: "Yeah. That's what I hate most. It's like this place wants you to forget that."
Also @ Banshee:
You posted some Samara quotes (favouring destroy) recently. I think you posted three of them. I knew one of them, but the other two I couldn't remember. Can you post them again and remember when/where she says those?
Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 05 octobre 2012 - 09:08 .
#30382
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:08
Btw, can you show me the timestamps of those soldiers in Control/Synthesis in the videos I linked? I do not find them, lol.
Edit: Damn it, I think those are the pre-EC endings >.<.
Modifié par Restrider, 05 octobre 2012 - 09:10 .
#30384
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:22
#30385
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:32
Indoctrinating shepard Is Not Their Plan
" With the Extended Cut and Leviathan DLC released, I'm surprised to see
that there are some people still hanging on to the Indoctrination
Theory. Don't get me wrong, it's a good theory, back before the Extended
Cut and Leviathan, and I used to be a believer, but not anymore,
because I've taken notice of some evidence in the DLCs that point out to
a scheme that's bigger than indoctrination...."
Read more and have a cup of RAGE. lol
#30386
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:36
Very entertaining read. Lol.
#30387
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:36
Why is it that In Control the Citadel doesn't blow up, yet in Synthesis it does.
Synthesis shoud'nt cause the Citadel to blow up it's just synthesising everything in the galaxy.
Also notice in Destroy ending the first soldier we see is on the ground, and this other soldier helps him up. Yet only in Destroy ending with high EMS, or mabye low too The soldier that was on the ground, is standing by with the other soldier.
Yet in Synthesis, and Control the soldier on the ground cowards in fear, while the other soldier is pinned down on the ground.
#30389
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:38
#30390
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:38
Final Hours clearly stated that Bioware hadtrouble implementing a game mechanic where the player loses control of Shepard along side the dialogue wheel. What that proves that indoctrination was where Bioware intended the narrative to go. Bioware wouldn't just drop that and change the whole story. Instead, they implemented it in stunning meta fashion.
Extended cut was acrappy slide show that makes a mockery of everything mass effect. It was a bone thrown to everyone raging over the ending because they didn't get what Bioware was going for. A short voice over and some still pictures are nothing but a,way to quite things down enough to let their dlc plan be put into effect. Extended Cut was a huge joke
Control: Shepard is in charge of the entire Reaper armada. Nobody can challenge him. No conflict can exist in any large enough sense to make a sequel
Synthesis: The entire galaxy and Reaper armada are working as one. No potential conflict, no potential sequel.
Destroy: Possible, but the Reapers are gone. Leviathan wouldbe only enemy possible. Completely anti climatic since the Leviathan only have a fraction of Reaper numbers.
Bioware will have to spit in everyone's face who doesn't choose their given ending canon to make a sequel. It would literally be like your choice didn't happen
The only possibility is IT where choosing destroy breaks the indoctrination attempt. This would mean your final choice DOES matter, but only Sheps who break indoctrination can get up/have their assets/squad help to activate the crucible.
Personally like the idea that the crucible only brings down the Reapers shields allowing the galactic fleet to drive the Reapers out of Sol system. Thus, taking Earth back, and setting up perfectly for future content
#30391
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:39
Lol, post it where ever you want, it is not my property.masster blaster wrote...
Restrider is it all right we drop your post in that thread?
#30392
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:40
That's actually what I dug out of one of MB's posts. So the credits go to him.DoomsdayDevice wrote...
@RR:
Synthesis
Control
Destroy
Control/synthesis = identical.
Also, WOW, it's true! I never noticed that before!
In the moment right before this, the soldiers cheer in destroy/control. In synthesis, they just stand there, no cheering.
Modifié par Restrider, 05 octobre 2012 - 09:57 .
#30393
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:49
Do you remeber brysons experiment, the husk head sitting in his lab? Well out of boredome i triggered it repeatdly and after a certain amount of electrocutions..the thing blew up. Don't know if it's important but it was still in the lab when i did it...don't whether it's still possible once you brought it to the normandy.
#30394
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:53
#30395
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:55
The title is misleading and biased. The post itself is not that bad. It is one of the better (kind of) literal interpretations. And I think Bill Casey (well, someone with a Drell Avatar^^) and I discussed this a few pages ago.BatmanTurian wrote...
hey guys, look what we're frickin' back to: http://social.biowar.../index/14367719
Indoctrinating shepard Is Not Their Plan
" With the Extended Cut and Leviathan DLC released, I'm surprised to see
that there are some people still hanging on to the Indoctrination
Theory. Don't get me wrong, it's a good theory, back before the Extended
Cut and Leviathan, and I used to be a believer, but not anymore,
because I've taken notice of some evidence in the DLCs that point out to
a scheme that's bigger than indoctrination...."
Read more and have a cup of RAGE. lol
Modifié par Restrider, 05 octobre 2012 - 09:58 .
#30396
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:56
"Can I just politely point out that in each ending except refuse, the narrator says what they will do or what will happen, as if they're talking about the future. They're not talking about the present, therefore, an argument could be made that nothing said or in the slides actually happens. EDI says the galaxy will do stuff. She doesn't say it in past tense.
If it had actually happened, she would have said it in past tense. Same goes for Shepreaper and Hackett. They're just expressing their hopes and you're seeing images of those hopes. What you are seeing is not what might actually be happening based on the use of tense. "
#30397
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 09:58
Restrider wrote...
The title is misleading and biased. The post itself is not that bad. It is one of the better (kind of) literal interpretations. And I think I and Bill Casey (well, someone with a Drell Avatar^^) discussed this a few pages ago.BatmanTurian wrote...
hey guys, look what we're frickin' back to: http://social.biowar.../index/14367719
Indoctrinating shepard Is Not Their Plan
" With the Extended Cut and Leviathan DLC released, I'm surprised to see
that there are some people still hanging on to the Indoctrination
Theory. Don't get me wrong, it's a good theory, back before the Extended
Cut and Leviathan, and I used to be a believer, but not anymore,
because I've taken notice of some evidence in the DLCs that point out to
a scheme that's bigger than indoctrination...."
Read more and have a cup of RAGE. lol
It still makes me go " buh.....no." There's a chance, but it's a slim, slim chance. I mean, then we'd be saying the signs of indoctrination are red herrings themselves and now we're into wtf territory.
#30398
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 10:05
#30399
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 10:07
Arashi08 wrote...
soo...who's gonna play ME3 MP with the devs?
No, thanks. They don't want to hear what I want to say. They would probably mute or boot me. I'll spare them the trouble.
(man, I'm in a Rifneo mood tonight.)
#30400
Posté 05 octobre 2012 - 10:09




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





