80611 réponses à ce sujet

[spotlessvoid]

That's strike one Bioware. I can be forced to accept volus in MP. Fine, whatever.

Failing to capitalize on IT would end up as strike 2.

Validating synthesis would be like 876,942,364 (roughly) strikes at once.

[Restrider]

masster blaster wrote...

Well restrifer your post got ran sacked by people that clam IT is stupid, and the same old stuff they say, and over 17 votes are none of the above.

Pff.. like I care.
I added the "None of the above" for all those hating literalists/pro-enders so that I still can have reliable results.
If there were only reasonable options, the results would be worthless. But this is fail proof and I will elaborate why:
The common literalist takes everything at face value. If you present him with the option "None of the above", which equals "IT sucks, trolololol" he will vote on that, thus, leaving the actual choices untouched. So the result remains valid. It's like a trap to catch flies.

[spotlessvoid]

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Well restrifer your post got ran sacked by people that clam IT is stupid, and the same old stuff they say, and over 17 votes are none of the above.

Pff.. like I care.
I added the "None of the above" for all those hating literalists/pro-enders so that I still can have reliable results.
If there were only reasonable options, the results would be worthless. But this is fail proof and I will elaborate why:
The common literalist takes everything at face value. If you present him with the option "None of the above", which equals "IT sucks, trolololol" he will vote on that, thus, leaving the actual choices untouched. So the result remains valid. It's like a trap to catch flies.

Its sad they are so predictable

[Pascal219]

Any thoughts about this??

twitter.com/GambleMike/status/254665092518526976

Modifié par Pascal219, 09 octobre 2012 - 08:50 .

[Restrider]

spotlessvoid wrote...

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Well restrifer your post got ran sacked by people that clam IT is stupid, and the same old stuff they say, and over 17 votes are none of the above.

Pff.. like I care.
I added the "None of the above" for all those hating literalists/pro-enders so that I still can have reliable results.
If there were only reasonable options, the results would be worthless. But this is fail proof and I will elaborate why:
The common literalist takes everything at face value. If you present him with the option "None of the above", which equals "IT sucks, trolololol" he will vote on that, thus, leaving the actual choices untouched. So the result remains valid. It's like a trap to catch flies.

Its sad they are so predictable

I know, right?

[spotlessvoid]

Pascal219 wrote...

Any thoughts about this??

twitter.com/GambleMike/status/254665092518526976

Gamble has a PhD in being ambiguous

Tbh, it probably only means what are you waiting for

Modifié par spotlessvoid, 09 octobre 2012 - 09:13 .

[paxxton]

Restrider wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Well restrifer your post got ran sacked by people that clam IT is stupid, and the same old stuff they say, and over 17 votes are none of the above.

Pff.. like I care.
I added the "None of the above" for all those hating literalists/pro-enders so that I still can have reliable results.
If there were only reasonable options, the results would be worthless. But this is fail proof and I will elaborate why:
The common literalist takes everything at face value. If you present him with the option "None of the above", which equals "IT sucks, trolololol" he will vote on that, thus, leaving the actual choices untouched. So the result remains valid. It's like a trap to catch flies.

Its sad they are so predictable

I know, right?

And why didn't you create a single poll and make it available for 20 days?

[GethPrimeMKII]

Literalists sure bombed the crap out of that poll. I can understand disagreeing with the theory. I cant understand disagreeing with a theory strongly enough to bully people who support it.

[spotlessvoid]

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Literalists sure bombed the crap out of that poll. I can understand disagreeing with the theory. I cant understand disagreeing with a theory strongly enough to bully people who support it.

What a bunch of pathetic idiots. There's no kind way to say it.

Modifié par spotlessvoid, 09 octobre 2012 - 09:25 .

[masster blaster]

I got my Turian jet pack! Thank you Collectors. I say I killed 75 per round.

[spotlessvoid]

grey_wind wrote...

Shadrach 88 wrote...

grey_wind wrote...

All mentions of Harbinger are removed from the game if you didn't import.<_<

Anderson's line before the beam run is simply "several Sovereign class Reapers are coming".

I didn't know that, thanks.

Is the codex entry removed also? What about his mention in Leviathan?

I'm going off by what somebody who played without importing told me. I doubt he's mentioned in Leviathan, but his codex entry probably still exists.

Is that true?

Modifié par spotlessvoid, 09 octobre 2012 - 09:37 .

[masster blaster]

Spot if that is, then who the HELL KNOCKS Shepard out. I mean Harbinger IS the only Reaper we know/see land on Earth to stop Shepard. Besides, that would mean Shepard is dreaming of Harbinger are not really happening.

[spotlessvoid]

masster blaster wrote...

Spot if that is, then who the HELL KNOCKS Shepard out. I mean Harbinger IS the only Reaper we know/see land on Earth to stop Shepard. Besides, that would mean Shepard is dreaming of Harbinger are not really happening.

Honestly, anyone who starts with me3 doesn't deserve a coherent story. They also don't deserve to ever be in the awesome presence of Harbinger. If it's true.

[GethPrimeMKII]

Haven't downloaded the dlc yet. Still at work. Does harbinger speak at all in MP?

[spotlessvoid]

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Haven't downloaded the dlc yet. Still at work. Does harbinger speak at all in MP?

Sigh me too. I don't think he does

[Restrider]

paxxton wrote...
And why didn't you create a single poll and make it available for 20 days?

The reason is that in the polls of BSN you only are allowed to vote once. Given the sample size of about 100-150 votes and the eleven avialable options you would have, the resolution would not be good enough. Furhtermore, say you think "Indoctrination in general" should be placed as #1 followed by "Leviathan" and then by "Anderson & TIM". Yet, you can only vote for the first. Another one might think that "Indoctrination in general" should be placed as #1 aswell, but followed by "The Dream" and "The Guardian". This difference would not be accounted for in only one poll on the BSN.
That's why I am doing several polls.

Edit: And here is the link for the polls.
OT:
Paxxton, Home Run, we should really make a shrine for CuteKittem or how his/her name was. Man, the Chuck Norris of that match, lol.

BTW:
Does anyone else have the feeling that Collectors on silver are like other factions on gold?

Modifié par Restrider, 09 octobre 2012 - 09:58 .

[gunslinger_ruiz]

From the Bioware Blog:

"Harbinger is again a force to be reckoned with, as he is able to possess
any creature within the Collector faction. The effects vary from
creature to creature, but the…. outcome is inevitable…. you ….will… succumb and ascend…… Assuming direct control."

[Rifneno]

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Haven't downloaded the dlc yet. Still at work. Does harbinger speak at all in MP?

No.  

[BatmanTurian]

spotlessvoid wrote...

GethPrimeMKII wrote...

Haven't downloaded the dlc yet. Still at work. Does harbinger speak at all in MP?

Sigh me too. I don't think he does

\\

You get possessed units (Possessed Praetorians are a b**ch to take down). they get beefed up with shields and some armor. But no reaper voices, especially not Harbinger. Apparently, mp characters are not worthy.

[Skillz1986]

I think it is a good thung we do not hear harbinger in mp. No one except shepard ever heard him speak. Adds to IT if you aks me.

[PsiMatrix]

Skillz1986 wrote...

I think it is a good thung we do not hear harbinger in mp. No one except shepard ever heard him speak. Adds to IT if you aks me.

Here's how Harbinger would sound in MP:

ASSUMING CONTROL
THIS HURTS YOU
YOU HAVE THE ATTENTION OF THOSE GREATER THAN YOU
*repeat above 3 lines a dozen times*
*hit mute on the TV remote*

That's why we don't hear him in multiplayer. Collective will of players turning his sound off. :happy:

[Either.Ardrey]

gunslinger_ruiz wrote...

From the Bioware Blog:

"Harbinger is again a force to be reckoned with, as he is able to possess
any creature within the Collector faction. The effects vary from
creature to creature, but the…. outcome is inevitable…. you ….will… succumb and ascend…… Assuming direct control."

:lol:And their still being all secretive about the Volus on the Blog. Silly if you ask me. We already know from the character select screen that the leak is indeed accurate down to every single class. Why do they even bother not showing that info on the blog? 

Also, my MP Manifest hasn't updated in a long while now. I wonder why it's not working, since it was working just fine up until a week or so ago.

Modifié par Either.Ardrey, 09 octobre 2012 - 10:27 .

[TSA_383]

Interestingly, Harbinger's lines from the trailer appear in the DLC files:

<string>
<id>778861</id>
<position>945</position>
<data>We have returned.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778862</id>
<position>946</position>
<data>The organic hordes rally, refusing to recognize our supremacy.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778863</id>
<position>947</position>
<data>They struggle in vain, trusting in numbers to stall our advance.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778864</id>
<position>948</position>
<data>But we are the Harbinger of their Ascension...</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778865</id>
<position>949</position>
<data>Like every cycle before, they will resist...</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778866</id>
<position>950</position>
<data>And we will overwhelm.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778867</id>
<position>951</position>
<data>The outcome is inevitable.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778868</id>
<position>952</position>
<data>Or they will be annihilated.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704779</id>
<position>953</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704778</id>
<position>954</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704777</id>
<position>955</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704776</id>
<position>956</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704774</id>
<position>957</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704773</id>
<position>958</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704772</id>
<position>959</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704771</id>
<position>960</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704770</id>
<position>961</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704769</id>
<position>962</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704767</id>
<position>963</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>-2146704766</id>
<position>964</position>
<data>-1</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778994</id>
<position>965</position>
<data>And now they will understand the full extent of our superiority.</data>
</string>
<string>
<id>778995</id>
<position>966</position>
<data>They will succumb and ascend...</data>

[masster blaster]

Guys, and lady's have we found anything from the Retaliation files?

Oh and Ya I agree that Harbinger doesn't want to talk to use because Shepard it the target, and not the lesser heros.

Harbinger" Player you are not Shepard. I know this hurts you. Where is Shepard?" Ya I can see Harbinger telling us that.

[masster blaster]

TSA, there are some new lines in it, and if it's going to be in Omega I would were my " I love Harbinger shirt to school!"