80611 réponses à ce sujet

[spotlessvoid]

TSA_383 wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

possible. they better drop some serious hints in the upcoming dlc's then

[BleedingUranium]

TSA_383 wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

I'm still thinking it'll be Mass Effect 3.5/IT reveal.

Also, since you guys were talking about replicas and statues, does anyone else want this?

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 11 octobre 2012 - 10:57 .

[401 Kill]

I'm sorry, this post is now gone forever, I can't seem to get the quoting system to work when someone ends with a smilie face.

Modifié par 401 Kill, 11 octobre 2012 - 10:58 .

[HomesV500]

I would love a Mass Effect 4 honestly, this war is too big to last just one game there's still so much to tell!

[Fur28]

401 Kill wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

401 Kill wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

Hello! I don't know why they would have done that, but in my opinion, Bioware may have tried this to "pioneer" a new type of game. They want "Speculation for Everyone". They did want players to hold on to their copies of the game forever.

so you think the new type of gaming they were trying to "piooner" was release imcomplete game>let the speculation flow>release IT>people will love them again and forgive the first ending
and if that is the case do you think IT will be free or they will charge us $10

Oh, I think that some people will be mad. Bioware messed up with the original endings, and the EC was to stop the backlash. They're original plan may be different than the plan that they have now. I am unsure on how they could release a DLC specifically for IT. There are different theories on this. One is that all the DLC's together will help Shepard wake up from the Hallucination and keep up the fight. Another is that the DLC's would eventually have Shepard achieve victory through refuse. There could even be a post-ending DLC ment f if you pick destroy. Sadly, they are a company, and charging for it is not out of the question.

whathever the plan they have now, i still think it would be It or puzzle theory, because i´m sure EA will want them to keep using the reapers an shepard in future games

[401 Kill]

spotlessvoid wrote...

TSA_383 wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

possible. they better drop some serious hints in the upcoming dlc's then

Leviathan seemed to mean business then. (Insert smilie holding briefcase here).

[Fur28]

[/quote]

oh yeah. common tactic is ask a few "innocent" qurstions then try and burn us. hasnt worked once, doesn't stop 'em from trying

[/quote]

Do they fail cecause they try being "subtle" in their trolling? or how do you recgnize them?
i´m just asking because i dont want to end in a discussion with a troll

[spotlessvoid]

The problem with a prequel:


The biggest thing that's so special about Mass Effect is the immersion and the feeling like you are shaping that universe. In a prequel, whatever you do, the outcome is inevitable and nihilistic if it's a previous cycle. Earlier in this cycle and the outcome is inevitable and the weapons and powers are way less advanced. In this cycle during Reaper wars it would be like "Help in 5% of the Reaper War, then watch Shepard handle the other 95%"

[ShepnTali]

Well, an ME4 'continuation' would make sense with 'no new, changed, adding/subtracting endings'. One more story makes sense, too. I don't know how it jives with 'end of Shepard's story' however.

[Rifneno]

BleedingUranium wrote...
Also, since you guys were talking about replicas and statues, does anyone else want this?

Gah, hate the anime style.

[Fur28]

401 Kill wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

TSA_383 wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

possible. they better drop some serious hints in the upcoming dlc's then

Leviathan seemed to mean business then. (Insert smilie holding briefcase here).

and the good thing about using the leviathas is that bioware can´t up the scale any more than the reapers, and start another galatic war

[BleedingUranium]

ShepnTali wrote...

Well, an ME4 'continuation' would make sense with 'no new, changed, adding/subtracting endings'. One more story makes sense, too. I don't know how it jives with 'end of Shepard's story' however.

If it was a part 2, it would still technically be ME3, and thus it's not a continuation.

[TSA_383]

401 Kill wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

TSA_383 wrote...

Fur28 wrote...

Hello ITers, i´m new to this forum but i´ve been keeping keeping track with IT(well most of it, i think).
And something i have had in my mind for a while is:
When they release the IT dlc, How do you think bioware will explain the fact that it took them a year or more to release the real ending?

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

possible. they better drop some serious hints in the upcoming dlc's then

Leviathan seemed to mean business then. (Insert smilie holding briefcase here).

True.
I guess the message to the devs then, is: GET ON WITH IT 

[masster blaster]

Fur all you have to do his click the link, the last one on the first post byne our leader, and find join group.

[Fur28]

spotlessvoid wrote...

The problem with a prequel:


The biggest thing that's so special about Mass Effect is the immersion and the feeling like you are shaping that universe. In a prequel, whatever you do, the outcome is inevitable and nihilistic if it's a previous cycle. Earlier in this cycle and the outcome is inevitable and the weapons and powers are way less advanced. In this cycle during Reaper wars it would be like "Help in 5% of the Reaper War, then watch Shepard handle the other 95%"

But imo, what they can do if make a story not about big decision that decide the fate of the universe, but a story about your main character and his squad, wich will be some sort of special ops, and during the game you´ll make decisions wich will either save or kill members of your squad; and also throught the game you can witness some of the key moments in watherver war you´re in.

tldr;
they should make the prequel more about characters  you want to keep alive than epic scale story

[HomesV500]

If Bioware is making another ME game they need to bring back an end once and for all like part 2 or something because that's some of the best piece of music I've ever heard.

[spotlessvoid]

The problem with that is it would really lose that epic feel that is a hallmark of ME. It's not impossible, but this isn't Halo. Trying to make someone care about a story that is irrelevant to the larger narrative you already know is going to be tough.

[HomesV500]

@spotless I agree prequels make sense for some games like MGS but not ME it just wouldn't make sense to me.

[LazyTechGuy]

Seems to contradict with the idea that Shepard's story has supposedly ended.

[Andromidius]

TSA_383 wrote...

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

So long as they take their time with it and its more then just 'IT explained' as a plot, and has co-op campaign and a properly designed journal...

I'll be happy with ME4.

[Fur28]

@spotlessvoid
i see your point, but if they make a prequel and i had to choose between small story about characters, or epic scale story in wich your choices wont matter. or create an alternare reality(sort of a spinoff, or i just dont know how to explain it)
i would choose the first, mostly because the characters were my favorite part about mass effect

[Fur28]

HomesV500 wrote...

@spotless I agree prequels make sense for some games like MGS but not ME it just wouldn't make sense to me.

yeah, i dont want a prequel either, but remember that gaming is an industry and it isn´t always about making a good story tha fits the franchise, sometimes it´s just about making money:devil:

[Andromidius]

Maybe I shouldn't jinx myself, but I've managed to have five silver games in a row without disconnecting! And four were full extractions! Let's hope this trend continues...

I want Claymore upgrades, dammit. Not Geth SMG's!

[401 Kill]

Andromidius wrote...

TSA_383 wrote...

As much as it pains me to say it, I'm starting to think that'll be mass effect 4...

So long as they take their time with it and its more then just 'IT explained' as a plot, and has co-op campaign and a properly designed journal...

I'll be happy with ME4.

This plus the control of party members during combat like in the KOTOR series!

[masster blaster]

But you see fur the problem with Bioware is that they explaine so much about the inriched story. It's hard to make a prequel to ME. Beisdes if it's about how the Reapers were made, I will just shake my head and ask " why Bioware did we buy this."

It's like Reach, when we learn over time in Halo 1-3 that only one sparten lived, and that Reach was the last colony to fall. So making a story about the Reapers, or the first contact war is just wrong.

I would like to play them, but there is no point other than to play events that have passed.