80611 réponses à ce sujet

[401 Kill]

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Ellythe wrote...

I'm no longer holding out hope that Bioware is going to include Indoctrination Theory to Mass Effect canon. I have, however, added it permanently to my headcanon for the end. Narratively speaking, it's the only thing that makes any part of the ending make any logical sense. I love Mass Effect 3, but I vehemently detest the last 10 minutes or so, and avoid them at all costs.

Why not?  I mean, they added a few new things in the Extended Cut, in Leviathan, and they left so many of those things that were not originally explained unexplained.  I still believe that they're going to do something with IT, and, moreover, that they originally intended it.

If IT is the only logical explanation that makes sense of the ending, it's logical that BioWare will include it (if they didn't do it already) in ME canon.

And the final hours app said that Bioware was planning on using indoctrination, but only the mechanic of the player losing control of Shepard was dropped.

[Dwailing]

401 Kill wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Ellythe wrote...

I'm no longer holding out hope that Bioware is going to include Indoctrination Theory to Mass Effect canon. I have, however, added it permanently to my headcanon for the end. Narratively speaking, it's the only thing that makes any part of the ending make any logical sense. I love Mass Effect 3, but I vehemently detest the last 10 minutes or so, and avoid them at all costs.

Why not?  I mean, they added a few new things in the Extended Cut, in Leviathan, and they left so many of those things that were not originally explained unexplained.  I still believe that they're going to do something with IT, and, moreover, that they originally intended it.

If IT is the only logical explanation that makes sense of the ending, it's logical that BioWare will include it (if they didn't do it already) in ME canon.

And the final hours app said that Bioware was planning on using indoctrination, but only the mechanic of the player losing control of Shepard was dropped.

I still don't get how people can think that BioWare didn't even CONSIDER indoctrination. 

[HomesV500]

Fingertrip wrote...

You guys are going to be disapointed when Omega is released and the fact it has no tie-in to Indoctrination. Let-alone, nothing this year will tie in with Indoctrination, nor will the next one.

I'm constantly baffled by why people believe IT is real these days. People really are grasping at straws now. No disrespect, it's a cool theory and probably would have been a better recieved ending, but it's not going to happend- it just aint.

Thats why the latest DLC was completely about indoctrination, why would this one be any different care to explain?

Modifié par HomesV500, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:11 .

[paxxton]

Dwailing wrote...

401 Kill wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Dwailing wrote...

Ellythe wrote...

I'm no longer holding out hope that Bioware is going to include Indoctrination Theory to Mass Effect canon. I have, however, added it permanently to my headcanon for the end. Narratively speaking, it's the only thing that makes any part of the ending make any logical sense. I love Mass Effect 3, but I vehemently detest the last 10 minutes or so, and avoid them at all costs.

Why not?  I mean, they added a few new things in the Extended Cut, in Leviathan, and they left so many of those things that were not originally explained unexplained.  I still believe that they're going to do something with IT, and, moreover, that they originally intended it.

If IT is the only logical explanation that makes sense of the ending, it's logical that BioWare will include it (if they didn't do it already) in ME canon.

And the final hours app said that Bioware was planning on using indoctrination, but only the mechanic of the player losing control of Shepard was dropped.

I still don't get how people can think that BioWare didn't even CONSIDER indoctrination. 

Perhaps, like me, they liked the original ending when they saw it the first time.

[byne]

paxxton wrote...

Perhaps, like me, they liked the original ending when they saw it the first time.

Didnt that one poll of like 50,000 people indicate that people like you were only about 2% of players or some ridiculously low number?

[plfranke]

So how does everyone feel about omega?

[HomesV500]

@Dwailing I know right, theres so much evidence that supports this theory its ridiculous yet people think its just all coincidence, oh and the notorious bad writing.

Modifié par HomesV500, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:24 .

[spotlessvoid]

plfranke wrote...

So how does everyone feel about omega?

Mass 3 Effect Omega? Loojs promising, but unless I see Collectors in the trailer I.ll be waiting for reviews from this thread

[plfranke]

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

[masster blaster]

So let me get this straight. finger you don't think IT is goin to happen, but you telling us to throw in the towel, and stoop months of speculations. I am sorry but no thanks. To be honest we're the only theory that has been speculating on the endings for seven months straight.

We are are on mark 3. While other theorys are still on the first thread, and most of the threads here haven't been speculating on the endings at all. What I mean is that if you look at all the threads that have been created since March. They are still on the first thread, yet we are on the third.

Heck we even beet the " For the little blue children thread", and that has been around since March I think.

Oh and over all if you count the views, which somebody did.

We have over 2 million views. And 55904 post. So If Bioware never planed IT. Never give a f*** about us, then why let us go on.

I see no point in it.

Ya to get more people to not backlash at them, but if they don't do IT, then people will backlash harder than March 10.

[Rifneno]

By setting a date so far away, BW has broken Omega's only rule.

[HomesV500]

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

Honestly it's a good thing to me becuase of the plethora of games that come out during October and November, just play a game that will pass the time like dishonored, great game so far.

Modifié par HomesV500, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:35 .

[spotlessvoid]

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

[paxxton]

byne wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Perhaps, like me, they liked the original ending when they saw it the first time.

Didnt that one poll of like 50,000 people indicate that people like you were only about 2% of players or some ridiculously low number?

Well, maybe the numbers aren't great but we have strong resolve.  For the record, the EC was better than the OE and IT rules!

[paxxton]

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

Me too.  What do? Have to wait.

[paxxton]

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

[paxxton]

I might as well post a 4th post in a row.

Modifié par paxxton, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:36 .

[HomesV500]

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Ahh I see what you did there. 

[estebanus]

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Oh noes! Teh end of teh worldz!

[Restrider]

Reposting since it was burried in troll hateing:

Restrider wrote...

I liked Petrovsky not necessarily because he is russian, but because he was an ambivalent character. He would be perfectly suited for what I thought of Cerberus in ME 2. Kind of respectable goals but trying to achieve them in a shady way.
He also is a character that is able to show empathy and respect to his enemies. Furthermore his affinity to history was something I liked.
He is classy, respectful, thoughtful and more a strategist/tactician than some kind of aggressive mook with the tendency to act like an attention wh0re with an affinity to other people's comestible goods (guess who I am referring to). This kind of makes him to the anti-Kai-Leng within Cerberus and thus a formidable opponent (or even a valuable ally if he is not indoctrinated/integrated).

On another note:
WHY PAXXTON DID YOU LEAVE BEHIND MY CORPSE ON BENNING!!?!?

And on even another note:
" Freude schöner Götterfunken
  Tochter aus Elysium
  Wir betreten feuertrunken
  Himmlische dein Heiligtum"
Kudos.

And on the thrid note:
Go, vote, now! (1&2)

[estebanus]

Restrider wrote...

Reposting since it was burried in troll hateing:

Restrider wrote...

I liked Petrovsky not necessarily because he is russian, but because he was an ambivalent character. He would be perfectly suited for what I thought of Cerberus in ME 2. Kind of respectable goals but trying to achieve them in a shady way.
He also is a character that is able to show empathy and respect to his enemies. Furthermore his affinity to history was something I liked.
He is classy, respectful, thoughtful and more a strategist/tactician than some kind of aggressive mook with the tendency to act like an attention wh0re with an affinity to other people's comestible goods (guess who I am referring to). This kind of makes him to the anti-Kai-Leng within Cerberus and thus a formidable opponent (or even a valuable ally if he is not indoctrinated/integrated).

On another note:
WHY PAXXTON DID YOU LEAVE BEHIND MY CORPSE ON BENNING!!?!?

And on even another note:
" Freude schöner Götterfunken
  Tochter aus Elysium
  Wir betreten feuertrunken
  Himmlische dein Heiligtum"
Kudos.

And on the thrid note:
Go, vote, now! (1&2)

Uhm, Is there a reason why you quoted a part of "Ode An Die Freude?"

[BansheeOwnage]

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Oh noes! Teh end of teh worldz!

NOOOOoooooo!

[Either.Ardrey]

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Oh noes! Teh end of teh worldz!

Naaahhh... the world can't on the 21st. Citadel wouldn't have come out yet at that time.

[paxxton]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Oh noes! Teh end of teh worldz!

NOOOOoooooo!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Modifié par paxxton, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:55 .

[estebanus]

BansheeOwnage wrote...

estebanus wrote...

paxxton wrote...

spotlessvoid wrote...

plfranke wrote...

November 27 is a long way from now. I'm pretty disappointed tbh

I here ya. That's almost next year

And December 21st is coming fast.

Oh noes! Teh end of teh worldz!

NOOOOoooooo!

BANSHEE!

Damn, I haven't seen you here in a while! How's it going?

EDIT: Most. Perfect. Timing. Ever.
Yeah, Top!

Modifié par estebanus, 12 octobre 2012 - 10:55 .