Nope. "Nuts", not insane. Now you call me "idiot".BansheeOwnage wrote...
Idiot. I didn't call everyone else insane. I called you insane. You said all the ITers are nuts. Therefore, you called everyone else insane.
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#3501
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:37
#3502
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:37
#3503
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:38
shepdog77 wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Indeed. Bioware isn't known for lying, now are they?shepdog77 wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
shepdog77 wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
Sheepdog, new dialogue is still changing the ending. It'll be different from what it is now.
It's changing the Catalyst's exposition at certain parts, and I'm going to guess it'll add a new slide, but not a new ending.
P.S. My name is Shepdog77, not Sheepdog
Well, they changed the Catalyst's dialogue enough in the EC that it was possible to tell him to frak off thus creating a new ending. Don't dismiss what effect changing the dialogue can have.
Fair enough, but that would also mean Gamble was lying. Again.
Oh wait.
Yeah, as much as I love ME3 and the hard work the dev team put into it, it's hard to ignore some of the pre-release lies such as "There will be no A, B, and C endings"
They're lying to us as much as Star-Brat! Wait a minute...
#3504
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:38
shepdog77 wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
Sheepdog, new dialogue is still changing the ending. It'll be different from what it is now.
It's changing the Catalyst's exposition at certain parts, and I'm going to guess it'll add a new slide, but not a new ending.
P.S. My name is Shepdog77, not Sheepdog
But sheepdog, that's still changing the endings
#3505
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:38
Because that isn't the same thing at all.Iconoclaste wrote...
Nope. "Nuts", not insane. Now you call me "idiot".BansheeOwnage wrote...
Idiot. I didn't call everyone else insane. I called you insane. You said all the ITers are nuts. Therefore, you called everyone else insane.
#3506
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:39
estebanus wrote...
Probably a pedophile.byne wrote...
I was called a zealot yesterday, and insane today.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring!
No, I was called that two days ago.
I- I mean, dont be silly!
Dwailing wrote...
Well, if this keeps going, I know how it will end. You'll either be called the AntiChrist, or the Catalyst, and I'm not sure which is worse.
I'm pretty sure I was also called the Catalyst by someone a few days ago. By masster maybe? Not sure...
#3507
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:39
Once again: Whut.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I think he wants BioWare to hire him as a moderator on BSN.estebanus wrote...
Masster, WTF are you talking about?!
Not a good idea to pick and ITer, more like a person, who os okay with the endings. I am with Destroy, but there is more to the endings/the last 15 min.
#3508
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:39
I'm okay with the endings.masster blaster wrote...
paxxton wrote...
I think he wants BioWare to hire him as a moderator on BSN.estebanus wrote...
Masster, WTF are you talking about?!
Not a good idea to pick and ITer, more like a person, who os okay with the endings. I am with Destroy, but there is more to the endings/the last 15 min.
#3509
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:39
byne wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I could say the same of you, calling Byne and everyone else in here insane.
I was called a zealot yesterday, and insane today.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring!
Hmmm... maybe you'll be called Hitler?
Modifié par shepdog77, 03 août 2012 - 07:41 .
#3510
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:39
Iconoclaste wrote...
Nope. "Nuts", not insane. Now you call me "idiot".BansheeOwnage wrote...
Idiot. I didn't call everyone else insane. I called you insane. You said all the ITers are nuts. Therefore, you called everyone else insane.
Oh yes, because "nuts" and "insane" have SUCH different meanings. They're as different as the three endings were pre-EC, and we ALL know how different the three endings were pre-EC.
#3511
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:40
Oh, really? I bring forth to you something you said:Iconoclaste wrote...
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Get a reading lesson, please. Banshee started, Byne quoted and agreed, and I did not call anyone else insane than Byne. Read carefully, please, or else your contribution to the forum will be lessened : who will believe evidence you bring forward if you can't even read a few posts correctly? Tssss....estebanus wrote...
I could say the same of you, calling Byne and everyone else in here insane.
Also, banshee called you insane. Not everyone.
"Byne is the one who's insane here, and drove all of you nuts on all kinds of false tracks."
Here's another one you should consider:
"Read carefully, please, or else your contribution to the forum will be lessened"
#3512
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:40
CoolioThane wrote...
shepdog77 wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
Sheepdog, new dialogue is still changing the ending. It'll be different from what it is now.
It's changing the Catalyst's exposition at certain parts, and I'm going to guess it'll add a new slide, but not a new ending.
P.S. My name is Shepdog77, not Sheepdog
But sheepdog, that's still changing the endings
Uh, are you calling him sheepdog just to annoy him?
#3513
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:40
THAT is ban-worthy.shepdog77 wrote...
byne wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I could say the same of you, calling Byne and everyone else in here insane.
I was called a zealot yesterday, and insane today.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring!
Hmmm... maybe you'll be called Hitler?
*snip for the allies!*
Modifié par estebanus, 03 août 2012 - 07:45 .
#3514
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:40
CoolioThane wrote...
shepdog77 wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
Sheepdog, new dialogue is still changing the ending. It'll be different from what it is now.
It's changing the Catalyst's exposition at certain parts, and I'm going to guess it'll add a new slide, but not a new ending.
P.S. My name is Shepdog77, not Sheepdog
But sheepdog, that's still changing the endings
Reported.
#3515
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:40
Arashi08 wrote...
Can't we all just get along? or at least hate each other in the privacy of our own minds?
You have no privacy in the presense of Reapers!
#3516
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:41
It depends on your tolerance to ill-defined discourse. Here, it's allowed to say anything you wish, it seems...estebanus wrote...
Because that isn't the same thing at all.Iconoclaste wrote...
Nope. "Nuts", not insane. Now you call me "idiot".BansheeOwnage wrote...
Idiot. I didn't call everyone else insane. I called you insane. You said all the ITers are nuts. Therefore, you called everyone else insane.
#3517
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:41
byne wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Probably a pedophile.byne wrote...
I was called a zealot yesterday, and insane today.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring!
No, I was called that two days ago.
I- I mean, dont be silly!Dwailing wrote...
Well, if this keeps going, I know how it will end. You'll either be called the AntiChrist, or the Catalyst, and I'm not sure which is worse.
I'm pretty sure I was also called the Catalyst by someone a few days ago. By masster maybe? Not sure...
Well then, if you were called the Catalyst, then you must have been called the AntiChrist before then and just forgotten. Because the Catalyst is MUCH worse than the AntiChrist.
#3518
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:41
estebanus wrote...
THAT is ban-worthy.
You're right, I removed the pic. :innocent:
#3519
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:41
estebanus wrote...
THAT is ban-worthy.shepdog77 wrote...
byne wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I could say the same of you, calling Byne and everyone else in here insane.
I was called a zealot yesterday, and insane today.
I wonder what tomorrow will bring!
Hmmm... maybe you'll be called Hitler?
*snip*
Sure, 'tis probably ban-worthy, but it amused me.
Despite myself, I am generally amused by shepdog's antics. He's one of the few trolls I dont really mind.
#3520
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:42
shepdog77 wrote...
Dwailing wrote...
shepdog77 wrote...
CoolioThane wrote...
Sheepdog, new dialogue is still changing the ending. It'll be different from what it is now.
It's changing the Catalyst's exposition at certain parts, and I'm going to guess it'll add a new slide, but not a new ending.
P.S. My name is Shepdog77, not Sheepdog
Well, they changed the Catalyst's dialogue enough in the EC that it was possible to tell him to frak off thus creating a new ending. Don't dismiss what effect changing the dialogue can have.
Fair enough, but that would also mean Gamble was lying. Again.
Bioware are serial liers anyway.
ME2: "Are we getting another squadmate?" "No." *Releases Kasumi DLC*
ME3: "Is there going to be multiplayer?" "No." *Announces Multiplayer*
"Are you going to change the ending?" "No." *Announces EC a day before PAX panel*
They're just the ones I remember.
Modifié par AxStapleton, 03 août 2012 - 07:43 .
#3521
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:42
XanderLav wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Masster, WTF are you talking about?!
I keep coming back to this thread just to read his posts
Hey this should not be a reason to come back to this thread.
#3522
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:43
shepdog77 wrote...
estebanus wrote...
THAT is ban-worthy.
You're right, I removed the pic. :innocent:
Uh, last time I checked, it's still there.
Wait, that's just estebanus's quote. Estebanus, delete that picture please, I'd rather not be stared at by a Complete Monster.
Modifié par Dwailing, 03 août 2012 - 07:43 .
#3523
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:43
Oh, but it is.masster blaster wrote...
XanderLav wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Masster, WTF are you talking about?!
I keep coming back to this thread just to read his posts
Hey this should not be a reason to come back to this thread.
Changed to 87.57%
#3524
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:44
#3525
Posté 03 août 2012 - 07:44
AxStapleton wrote...
Bioware are serial liers anyway.
ME2: "Are we getting another squadmate?" "No." *Releases Kasumi DLC*
Are you sure they ever denied Kasumi?
I mean, like 90% of her dialogue was included on the disk...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




