80611 réponses à ce sujet

[LazyTechGuy]

Ah gotcha. I have a feeling Gamble was referring to the minimum time it would take to complete Leviathan rather than a completionist's version. But now I'm just branching into speculation mode so I won't make my assumptions fact.

I guess we'll see. I just always get weary when we put too much weight on Gamble's hype machine.

[Arian Dynas]

Still going strong?

I'm glad.

Hello folks, killing some time before class.

[paxxton]

Humakt83 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Vote NOW!
http://social.biowar...66/polls/40322/

What does religious and not religious mean in this context?

A religious person is someone who either believes in a supernatural god or power and attends places of worship, or simply believes in a supernatural god or power. A non-religious person is an atheist or agnostic.

Modifié par paxxton, 16 octobre 2012 - 07:20 .

[paxxton]

Arian Dynas wrote...

Still going strong?

I'm glad.

Hello folks, killing some time before class.

Hi! Omega is coming out November 27th!

[masster blaster]

Hello Arian. So am I actually class is about to start so see ya.

[FifthBeatle]

paxxton wrote...

Humakt83 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Vote NOW!
http://social.biowar...66/polls/40322/

What does religious and not religious mean in this context?

A religious person is someone who either believes in a supernatural god or power and attends places of worship, or simply believes in a supernatural god or power. A non-religious person is an atheist or agnostic.

The results of the poll so far are not very suprising assuming that most voters are ITers. 

[paxxton]

FifthBeatle wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Humakt83 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Vote NOW!
http://social.biowar...66/polls/40322/

What does religious and not religious mean in this context?

A religious person is someone who either believes in a supernatural god or power and attends places of worship, or simply believes in a supernatural god or power. A non-religious person is an atheist or agnostic.

The results of the poll so far are not very suprising assuming that most voters are ITers. 

You could say that. I though there would be more diversity in how many people chose different endings. Well, looks like the indoc attempt by BioWare kinda failed.

[byne]

Arian Dynas wrote...

Still going strong?

I'm glad.

Hello folks, killing some time before class.

Arian! You need to start coming back to the thread more regularly! 

It just isnt the same without you and your awesome textwalls!

[paxxton]

SwobyJ wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Humakt83 wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Vote NOW!
http://social.biowar...66/polls/40322/

What does religious and not religious mean in this context?

A religious person is someone who either believes in a supernatural god or power and attends places of worship, or simply believes in a supernatural god or power. A non-religious person is an atheist or agnostic.

Even those who believe in Christ are religious, as they obtained that idea from religious individuals or from clearly religious texts, they just don't follow a specific church.

Spiritual is a far more broad concept, that you just think that deities/spirits/larger supernatual concepts exist.

Just wanted to further clarify to those on this thread. I'm an agnostic athiest myself, and my boyfriend is more of the agnostic thiest sort (Christian Lebanese family though). He's playing Mass Effect 2 now and I wonder what his final ME3 choice will be

I collectively included Christ in god. Well, that was actually one of the reasons of stating the poll's question ambiguously. Everybody knows to some extent if they are religious or not. They just need to choose an answer.

Don't forget to post what he chooses. And tell him to vote!

Modifié par paxxton, 16 octobre 2012 - 07:45 .

[Eryri]

SwobyJ wrote...

LazyTechGuy wrote...

ajk_Jack wrote...

This puts Omega at about 6-8 hours in length, which is longer than many retail games. I think it is a combination of multiple DLC's because of the EC pushing everything back. It would also explain the late release date if they went ahead and just merge two DLC's together because they were similar in nature.

Well remember, he said "basically double the size of any ME3 DLC".  So double Leviathan, really.  LotSB doesn't qualify under that comment.  Was Leviathan 3 hours long?  I didn't download it.

See how Gamble plays the word game?  They're pros at semantics over at BW.

Totally. They're both masters and failures at PR. Masters in that they REALLY know how to word things. Failures because they don't exactly gather up player faith in them, at this point.

But yeah, Leviathan is between 2-4 hours. I'd say Omega will be 3-6 (and only 6 if you investigate everything and realllllyyy take your time, so more like 3-5).

Hi again all, thanks for the replies.

Yeah the spin doctoring and PR is getting a bit much at this point. I'm hoping for some clarity and possibly an Omega trailer on November 7th.

I'm a bit disappointed to hear that Collectors won't be making an appearance in Omega, but on the plus side maybe this means we'll see the Adjutants after all?

[ajk_Jack]

Eryri wrote...

Hi again all, thanks for the replies.

Yeah the spin doctoring and PR is getting a bit much at this point. I'm hoping for some clarity and possibly an Omega trailer on November 7th.

I'm a bit disappointed to hear that Collectors won't be making an appearance in Omega, but on the plus side maybe this means we'll see the Adjutants after all?

One can hope. I'll admit, I'm a little disheartened to hear this news. I'm still excited - don't get me wrong. Now I wonder what Omega will be about. Knowing BioWare and their track record, this won't just be a 'go to Omega and kill Cerberus troopers' DLC. It'll have a story. So what could that story be? How could they flesh it out to be double the size of Leviathan?

[paxxton]

We are not alone in the Universe!
http://io9.com/59521...ster-on-mercury

Modifié par paxxton, 16 octobre 2012 - 08:21 .

[TSA_383]

I speculated a while back when looking at the file links and conditionals that either the Omega and Citadel DLCs had been merged into a single entity, or that the DLC would compare Omega and the Citadel...
I wonder...

[smokingotter1]

lex0r11 wrote...

Oh look! It's Otter trying to figure out the endings!

They just didn't have a green one so he had to improvise.

Late reply, purple = refuse... as it it refuses to fit.

[paxxton]

TSA_383 wrote...

I speculated a while back when looking at the file links and conditionals that either the Omega and Citadel DLCs had been merged into a single entity, or that the DLC would compare Omega and the Citadel...
I wonder...

Compare? How? You mean events in Omega DLC will have consequences in the Citadel DLC? 

[smokingotter1]

masster blaster wrote...

Otter my friend good to see you. And Think about this. If you unlock endings due to your ems, which is the best one.

Destroy because of the breath scene. It's a nod to the players, that your Shepard past the test.

Synthesis is the Reapers ultimate Control over Shepard, while Destroy breath scene is Shepard's trojin horse.

True, synthesis could represent what a lot of you have been saying, the reapers are desperate and don't have time to control (blue) Shepard so they hope he'll walk into the giant magic beam and straight up join them willingly.

Modifié par smokingotter1, 16 octobre 2012 - 08:26 .

[ajk_Jack]

TSA_383 wrote...

I speculated a while back when looking at the file links and conditionals that either the Omega and Citadel DLCs had been merged into a single entity, or that the DLC would compare Omega and the Citadel...
I wonder...

I'm thinking the same thing. Perhaps the Citadel DLC wasn't as strong on its own as Omega and they became one. Otherwise it would be the Omega and Citadel DLC. 
However, I like the idea of the two being compared. That's interesting food for thought. :happy:

[CmdrShep80]

FifthBeatle wrote...

Ithurael wrote...

FifthBeatle wrote...

How does not having the Collectors in Omega affect IT?

Everything you see...affects IT

Did you not know this?

This proves IT.

LMAO I can just see someone going to the other forums and say "this proves IT"

[ajk_Jack]

paxxton wrote...

We are not alone in the Universe!
http://io9.com/59521...ster-on-mercury

When I first saw that photo, I saw an apple. *sigh* Different interpretations I guess.

[paxxton]

ajk_Jack wrote...

paxxton wrote...

We are not alone in the Universe!
http://io9.com/59521...ster-on-mercury

When I first saw that photo, I saw an apple. *sigh* Different interpretations I guess.

LOL. It doesn't look like an apple to me. Might be a cartoonish frog though.

[plfranke]

Sorry I couldn't post that link to the confirmation but I was doing something else and just logged back on the thread right now.

Well people it's been a good run for me but with the recent no collectors statement, I am finally convinced Bioware doesn't care what the fans want. I also believe that IT isn't what they intended and they are simply milking the people who try to have positive attitudes about their ambiguity. I am officially done with IT but it was nice speculating with the lot of yall.

I will probably drop in with the literalists when there's some good arguing going on though.

[ajk_Jack]

paxxton wrote...

ajk_Jack wrote...

paxxton wrote...

We are not alone in the Universe!
http://io9.com/59521...ster-on-mercury

When I first saw that photo, I saw an apple. *sigh* Different interpretations I guess.

LOL. It doesn't look like an apple to me. Might be a cartoonish frog though.

The inside of the crater does kinda look like an apple, if you tilt your head to the left a little. My imagination can't account for the other, smaller craters unfortunately.

[ajk_Jack]

plfranke wrote...

Sorry I couldn't post that link to the confirmation but I was doing something else and just logged back on the thread right now.

Well people it's been a good run for me but with the recent no collectors statement, I am finally convinced Bioware doesn't care what the fans want. I also believe that IT isn't what they intended and they are simply milking the people who try to have positive attitudes about their ambiguity. I am officially done with IT but it was nice speculating with the lot of yall.

I will probably drop in with the literalists when there's some good arguing going on though.