Definitely not Bioware that's for sure.ElSuperGecko wrote...
Who was it that said "there's no such thing as bad publicity"?
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#35826
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 10:42
#35827
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 10:48
401 Kill wrote...
Definitely not Bioware that's for sure.
OK, let me rephrase in the words of Oscar Wilde...
"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about".
All these people bleating out the "Does this prove IT?" line are doing is giving us more exposure. If it gets one or two new players or posters to say "hey, what's IT?" and visit or contribute to this thread, then we can afford to be indulgent about it.
I wonder just how many players outside of the BSN are speculating about the ending themselves, and whether indoctrination is playing a part. I know I was... it's actually what brought me back onto the forum.
#35828
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:02
ElSuperGecko wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
Definitely not Bioware that's for sure.
OK, let me rephrase in the words of Oscar Wilde...
"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about".
All these people bleating out the "Does this prove IT?" line are doing is giving us more exposure. If it gets one or two new players or posters to say "hey, what's IT?" and visit or contribute to this thread, then we can afford to be indulgent about it.
I wonder just how many players outside of the BSN are speculating about the ending themselves, and whether indoctrination is playing a part. I know I was... it's actually what brought me back onto the forum.
I thought something was off about the ending from the start but couldnt put my finger on it until I saw the Indoctrination Theory by coincedence. Then the pieces fell into place.
That is how I ended up here.
Modifié par Raistlin Majare 1992, 18 octobre 2012 - 11:03 .
#35829
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:10
#35830
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:10
There is really not much to speculate - even we here - All of us KNOW that the ending is indoctrination. And yet we are still here, and to tell the truth what we are doing here is not healthy.
And that is part of why we get such a big deal.
The game is out for more than six months and we're like "Hey, could the ending be in fact indoctrination?" - Well, Duh... It is not such a brainer after all. (and it is not that subtle frankly.)
Modifié par demersel, 18 octobre 2012 - 11:13 .
#35831
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:24
I just thought that the ending sucked when I played it through. Afterwards, I got really pissed off and started to rant about it nonstop. Then, my sister found the IT thread and introduced me to it. And now, here I am.Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
ElSuperGecko wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
Definitely not Bioware that's for sure.
OK, let me rephrase in the words of Oscar Wilde...
"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about".
All these people bleating out the "Does this prove IT?" line are doing is giving us more exposure. If it gets one or two new players or posters to say "hey, what's IT?" and visit or contribute to this thread, then we can afford to be indulgent about it.
I wonder just how many players outside of the BSN are speculating about the ending themselves, and whether indoctrination is playing a part. I know I was... it's actually what brought me back onto the forum.
I thought something was off about the ending from the start but couldnt put my finger on it until I saw the Indoctrination Theory by coincedence. Then the pieces fell into place.
That is how I ended up here.
#35832
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:31
And yet we have to wait...and wait... and wait...demersel wrote...
I don't think that that many players are actually speculating - I think they either know the ending to be indoctrination, either think the ending sucked. In both cases most people moved and put Mass Effect on hold.
There is really not much to speculate - even we here - All of us KNOW that the ending is indoctrination. And yet we are still here, and to tell the truth what we are doing here is not healthy.
And that is part of why we get such a big deal.
The game is out for more than six months and we're like "Hey, could the ending be in fact indoctrination?" - Well, Duh... It is not such a brainer after all. (and it is not that subtle frankly.)
#35833
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:37
#35834
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:40
The Anderson you meet in the citadel - is the Anderson of your mind - they way you remember him and what you percive him to be, same as the Illusive man there - at this point you are dead sure that illusive man lost it, and is a walking copy of Saren, so that is exactly what you see there. We don't yet know the fate of the illusive man (but it is very likely to be what we saw in the ending).
#35835
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:41
Possible idea for why they're waiting so long to release some variant of an IT-ending (if it exists).
Backlash showed them the fans weren't ready for the story to end in any way, saw opportunity to release pre-ending DLC without receiving more backlash.
Reasoning: Would they really buy/play a SP DLC if it happened before the IT (or variant) ending?
Result: A hellofa long wait while they develop/polish pre-ending DLC.
The potential payoff if an IT variant ending is released is still ... Exciting.
#35836
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:55
#35837
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 11:59
And everything about priority earth is to promote the idea of a glorious sacrifice to the player - and make him WANT to die in the end.
Modifié par demersel, 18 octobre 2012 - 12:00 .
#35838
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 12:03
#35839
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 12:09
#35840
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 12:30
Same hereRaistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
ElSuperGecko wrote...
401 Kill wrote...
Definitely not Bioware that's for sure.
OK, let me rephrase in the words of Oscar Wilde...
"The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about".
All these people bleating out the "Does this prove IT?" line are doing is giving us more exposure. If it gets one or two new players or posters to say "hey, what's IT?" and visit or contribute to this thread, then we can afford to be indulgent about it.
I wonder just how many players outside of the BSN are speculating about the ending themselves, and whether indoctrination is playing a part. I know I was... it's actually what brought me back onto the forum.
I thought something was off about the ending from the start but couldnt put my finger on it until I saw the Indoctrination Theory by coincedence. Then the pieces fell into place.
That is how I ended up here.
#35841
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 12:34
Interesting. All that you say makes sense, heck, it explains the ending itself very nicely. The idea of Anderson being indoctrinated and causing Shepard to die really does skew your idea of him.
#35842
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 12:57
- James
- Kaidan
- Ashley (unless you romanced her)
- Miranda
- Liara
Not compromised:
- Grunt
- Jacob
- Zaeed
- Kasumi
- Cortez
- Jack
- Samara
- Garrus
- Javik
- Wrex
- Tali
- Edi (she is afraid, but not indoctrinated, since she can't be)
Compromised:
- James
- Kaidan
- Ashley (unless you romanced her)
- Miranda
- Liara
The conpromised list is very interesting. It is made based only on their farefwell to you in the priority Earth mission.
And yet there is at least two interesting things those people have in common.
1 - they have the most plot armor.
2 - strangly, except Miranda, those are the people, who you did not the loyalty mission for. (you couldn;t since they weren't in ME2)
Now, two of those were in ME2:
Miranda - and you did a loyalty mission for her there,
And Liara - she was in Lair of the Shadow Broker, which of sort of her layalty mission.
Out of them all - Miranda and Aslhley is the less compromised - they just have doubts and fears (though it is really hard to tell with Ashley, since she's always holding everything inside)
I think tha fact that you saved Ashley's life on eden prime works as a sort of loyalty mission,, but not much.
Miranda on the other hand - things are strange with her - she was a squadmate in ME2 and you had a loyalty mission for her, BUT in ME3 you really get another one- and it is the same one - again it has to do with her sister and her father, but this time - it is a huge part of the main plot. (remind me, how do you find sanctuary if Miranda is died in ME2??)
The most comromised are Liara - she's just plain wacko. What was her last goodbuy vision was supposed to mean?? Even sheaprd in game goes "Huh??". And she has the most plot armor.
Second place is James. No loyalty for him. constantly hear strange hum during mass effect 3 - second place in the plot armor department. (liara wins this one only because of having it for longer time).
Kaidan is third place. Again no loyalty mission for him, And we didn't even have some dramatic history with him as we had with ashley - saving her at Eden prime.
Also those persons, except James are the people who we know to have had the most exposure to reapers after Shepard. About James we simply have no info - but of all the crew he's the only one who hears the hum, AND he gets bitten by huskhead AND comes o bryson's office on his own for no reason - and that office has a chunk of sovereign.
#35843
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:08
In other words, let's ignore every single piece of empirical evidence the film/game give us and see only what we want to see.
#35844
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:12
#35845
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:17
You see Batman is dead, but not Bruce. In other words Bruce is done being Batman, and Tim Drake is becoming the new dark knight.
#35846
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:18
Biotic Sage wrote...
Indoctrination Theory is to Mass Effect 3 as Alfred Only Imagines Seeing Bruce Wayne is to The Dark Knight Rises.
In other words, let's ignore every single piece of empirical evidence the film/game give us and see only what we want to see.
Seriusly there are people who dont think it was Bruce at the end of the movie?
Modifié par Raistlin Majare 1992, 18 octobre 2012 - 01:18 .
#35847
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:21
And all over priority earth he says - I want you there for that push. (in fact it is almost the only thing he says)
Modifié par demersel, 18 octobre 2012 - 01:25 .
#35848
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:22
Guest_SwobyJ_*
masster blaster wrote...
Biotic Sage. You do realize the Wayne is alive at the end. Alfred is not seeing anything he is really there. I mean the bat symbol is repaired, Wayne's batjet is back in the Hanger, and Robin got a ltter from wanye to go find the batcave. I mean heck everyone that knew who Batman was got a message that we was alive.
You see Batman is dead, but not Bruce. In other words Bruce is done being Batman, and Tim Drake is becoming the new dark knight.
You missed that he was saying. In fact, what you just said, *agreed* with him.
Think before you post.
#35849
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:23
Also did anyone not notice when the Alliance dreanought got blown up at Shepard's trail it sent Shepad back, and if you think about Harbinger what if he just sent Shepard flying way back into the rubble we see in Destroy.
#35850
Posté 18 octobre 2012 - 01:27
masster blaster wrote...
Dem you could also say how are gunships flying around the beam. I mean come on we couldn't get no air support to take out that Destroyer, but no when we get air support Harbinger one shots them.
Also did anyone not notice when the Alliance dreanought got blown up at Shepard's trail it sent Shepad back, and if you think about Harbinger what if he just sent Shepard flying way back into the rubble we see in Destroy.
I think the whole beam run is fake. The dream starts when you pass besides the "dead" reaper destroyer.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




