Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#36776
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:44
Who says that isn't exactly what happens after Shep is indoctrinated?
#36777
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:46
And how, pray, does it make less sense?Them not shooting it makes no sense. Conversely, them shooting it while Shepard is deciding makes less sense.
Defeating the Collectors is more of an accomplishment than killing Sovereign? Really? Especially since it didn't even get all of the Collectors. And remember that Harbinger was speaking to the Collector General with the "You have failed. We will find another way" line, not Shepard; it was probably saying "We'll find a way to build a human Reaper without you."Anything that Harbinger did before mass effect 3 is irrelevant because Harbinger would have taken an even greater interest in Shepard after he defeated Harbinger's personal goon squad. I find it hard to believe that when Harbinger said "We will find another way" he meant "Screw it we're going in guns hot"
TIM wasn't indoctrinated back then, or at least not enough to be actually helping the Reapers. His desire to resurrect Shepard to fight the Reapers was sincere; if he needed her alive for other reasons, he was certainly blase about trying to kill her in ME3, from Mars onward.Also, Harbinger used a confirmed indoctrinated agent, The Illusive Man, to bring Shepard back to life so your point about Harbinger shooting to kill is invaild.
Well, if you're assuming that they shoveled a whole bunch of rubble aboard Harbinger for the lulz...Who says that isn't exactly what happens after Shep is indoctrinated?
#36778
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:47
Javik speaks of entire worlds that fell to the reapers because of a few indoctrinated leaders...
#36779
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:48
This isn't one of them. The Reapers are on the verge of complete victory. Indoctrinating one soldier is redundant. Getting Hackett might be worthwhile, but not Shepard.Bill Casey wrote...
Indoctrinated Shepard would allow them to lose fewer reapers...
Javik speaks of entire worlds that fell to the reapers because of a few indoctrinated leaders...
#36780
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:48
The reapers have wanted Shepard alive since at least ME2, that much was blatantly obvious (particularly in arrival).Xilizhra wrote...
Okay, great. Now, how is Shepard even functional right now? Being both indoctrinated and dying in a field of rubble? And why the hell would Harbinger bother to use an indoctrination burst when it has a freakin' huge molten metal beam?plfranke wrote...
Some believe the indoctrination attempt happens during the mako crash which explains the terrible evac scene, which is not only not believable but is completely contradictory to a character like Javik.Xilizhra wrote...
So how are you explaining all of the supposed hallucinations earlier, if Shepard isn't indoctrinated until the very end? And if Shepard is indoctrinated at the very end, how the hell does she resist a blast that powerful?It's irrelevant anyway, because in IT Shepard isn't indoctrinated until they make the choice to support the Reapers' views and methods.
Likely as not the reapers want Shepard's mind to use it for the human reaper. Possibly due to his/her ability to influence people....plfranke wrote...
The problem I've never seen addressed by ITers is one that you just posed, motive. The Reapers already have this battle won so it doesn't really matter whether they indoctrinate Shepard or not, (assuming it's not a full Reaper trap). Even if it was a Reaper trap though I don't see why it matters considering the Reapers just completely outgun everyone. However, for every problem there is with IT there are 2 for the literal interperetation.Xilizhra wrote...
Okay, great. Now, how is Shepard even functional right now? Being both indoctrinated and dying in a field of rubble? And why the hell would Harbinger bother to use an indoctrination burst when it has a freakin' huge molten metal beam?plfranke wrote...
Some believe the indoctrination attempt happens during the mako crash which explains the terrible evac scene, which is not only not believable but is completely contradictory to a character like Javik.Xilizhra wrote...
So how are you explaining all of the supposed hallucinations earlier, if Shepard isn't indoctrinated until the very end? And if Shepard is indoctrinated at the very end, how the hell does she resist a blast that powerful?It's irrelevant anyway, because in IT Shepard isn't indoctrinated until they make the choice to support the Reapers' views and methods.
*cough*:
TSA_383 wrote...
Allow me to present to you all, the implantation theory:
It seems bizarre that almost every character in ME2 and ME3 who is around Shepard for any extended length of time becomes strongly Shepard-sexual. Just look at Samara, steely justicar who totally wants some rumpy pumpy after spending just minutes conversing with the Commander.
So, maybe the illusive man placed some kind of indoctrination beacon in shepard's genitals. Going back through ME2 and ME3, I think we can all see plenty of occasions in which this would explain a lot.
Samara, Shiala, Jack, Thane... Nobody is safe from Commander Shepard's crotch-mounted indoctrination device.
#36781
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:50
Xilizhra wrote...
Getting Hackett might be worthwhile, but not Shepard.
Now you're just being stupid on purpose...
#36782
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:50
So killing Shepard at the beginning of the game and repeatedly trying to kill Shepard (again, remember the "Preserve Shepard's body if possible" line) throughout the entire game isn't sufficient evidence to the contrary?The reapers have wanted Shepard alive since at least ME2, that much was blatantly obvious (particularly in arrival).
#36783
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:55
Arrival.Xilizhra wrote...
So killing Shepard at the beginning of the game and repeatedly trying to kill Shepard (again, remember the "Preserve Shepard's body if possible" line) throughout the entire game isn't sufficient evidence to the contrary?The reapers have wanted Shepard alive since at least ME2, that much was blatantly obvious (particularly in arrival).
Kenson (whilst being controlled by harbinger and with big yellow eyes):
"We need shepard alive"
Harbinger (speaking directly to Shepard in some poorly explained way):
"Struggle if you must, your mind will be ours"
+ other quotes I can't be bothered digging out.
Seems like they need to retrieve shepard alive or dead, but ideally alive...
#36784
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 03:57
I don't think she was actually controlled by Harbinger; she doesn't have any implants. I think Shepard was seeing the indoctrination as a visible effect due to being blasted by Object Rho earlier. However, Kenson was very obviously in the "mental degradation" stage of indoctrination, as she explained the entirety of the Project and exactly how to use it, correctly, to Shepard, for no damned reason. She literally handed the means of her own doom to Shepard. Kenson is, thanks to indoctrination, a complete moron, and I won't trust her word over Harbinger's own.Arrival.
Kenson (whilst being controlled by harbinger and with big yellow eyes):
"We need shepard alive"
Harbinger (speaking directly to Shepard in some poorly explained way):
"Struggle if you must, your mind will be ours"
In short, it'd be kind of nice for Harbinger if Shepard was alive, but it's a low priority at best. And, of course, Arrival may have just had a different writer.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 20 octobre 2012 - 03:59 .
#36785
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:01
Xilizhra wrote...
I don't think she was actually controlled by Harbinger; she doesn't have any implants. I think Shepard was seeing the indoctrination as a visible effect due to being blasted by Object Rho earlier. However, Kenson was very obviously in the "mental degradation" stage of indoctrination, as she explained the entirety of the Project and exactly how to use it, correctly, to Shepard, for no damned reason. She literally handed the means of her own doom to Shepard. Kenson is, thanks to indoctrination, a complete moron, and I won't trust her word over Harbinger's own.Arrival.
Kenson (whilst being controlled by harbinger and with big yellow eyes):
"We need shepard alive"
Harbinger (speaking directly to Shepard in some poorly explained way):
"Struggle if you must, your mind will be ours"
In short, it'd be kind of nice for Harbinger if Shepard was alive, but it's a low priority at best. And, of course, Arrival may have just had a different writer.
She had glowing yellow eyes.
Actually the writer for Arrival is the same one who was the lead on ME3
#36786
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:02
Xilizhra wrote...
I don't think she was actually controlled by Harbinger; she doesn't have any implants. I think Shepard was seeing the indoctrination as a visible effect due to being blasted by Object Rho earlier. However, Kenson was very obviously in the "mental degradation" stage of indoctrination, as she explained the entirety of the Project and exactly how to use it, correctly, to Shepard, for no damned reason. She literally handed the means of her own doom to Shepard. Kenson is, thanks to indoctrination, a complete moron, and I won't trust her word over Harbinger's own.Arrival.
Kenson (whilst being controlled by harbinger and with big yellow eyes):
"We need shepard alive"
Harbinger (speaking directly to Shepard in some poorly explained way):
"Struggle if you must, your mind will be ours"
In short, it'd be kind of nice for Harbinger if Shepard was alive, but it's a low priority at best. And, of course, Arrival may have just had a different writer.
We know for a fact Arrival was written by Mac Walters.
#36787
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:03
Very well. Shepard being alive is a minor perk that Harbinger will take advantage of, but is far from a priority.We know for a fact Arrival was written by Mac Walters.
Yes. In that one scene. Never anywhere else. Again, I believe it was just Shepard seeing the indoctrination for a moment.She had glowing yellow eyes.
#36788
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:03
Xilizhra wrote...
TIM wasn't indoctrinated back then, or at least not enough to be actually helping the Reapers. His desire to resurrect Shepard to fight the Reapers was sincere; if he needed her alive for other reasons, he was certainly blase about trying to kill her in ME3, from Mars onward.Also, Harbinger used a confirmed indoctrinated agent, The Illusive Man, to bring Shepard back to life so your point about Harbinger shooting to kill is invaild.
Wrong. He's been indoctrinated for several decades, it just became more obvious in ME3.
#36789
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:04
Xilizhra wrote...
Very well. Shepard being alive is a minor perk that Harbinger will take advantage of, but is far from a priority.We know for a fact Arrival was written by Mac Walters.
Yes. In that one scene. Never anywhere else. Again, I believe it was just Shepard seeing the indoctrination for a moment.She had glowing yellow eyes.
Or Harbinger was only controlling her at that point, then stopped. She was definitely just indoctrinated Kenson for the rest of the mission, not arguing that.
#36790
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:04
When the hell did I start defending this bastard? But while he got hit with something that gave him a hint of indoctrination, it didn't affect his actions to favor the Reapers, just gave him some knowledge about them. His goal was genuinely to fight the Reapers, and he made genuine progress against the Collectors, until sometime during ME3. The Reapers attacked his Sanctuary project because it was a genuine threat.BleedingUranium wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
TIM wasn't indoctrinated back then, or at least not enough to be actually helping the Reapers. His desire to resurrect Shepard to fight the Reapers was sincere; if he needed her alive for other reasons, he was certainly blase about trying to kill her in ME3, from Mars onward.Also, Harbinger used a confirmed indoctrinated agent, The Illusive Man, to bring Shepard back to life so your point about Harbinger shooting to kill is invaild.
Wrong. He's been indoctrinated for several decades, it just became more obvious in ME3.
But that makes no sense either. First of all, how, when Kenson lacks implants? Second, why? Assume direct control for something she was going to do anyway, namely imprison Shepard? Did he control her to ensure she did it badly?Or Harbinger was only controlling her at that point, then stopped. She
was definitely just indoctrinated Kenson for the rest of the mission,
not arguing that.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 20 octobre 2012 - 04:05 .
#36791
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:05
1. How is that possible, without being partially indoctrinated him/herself?Xilizhra wrote...
I don't think she was actually controlled by Harbinger; she doesn't have any implants. I think Shepard was seeing the indoctrination as a visible effect due to being blasted by Object Rho earlier. However, Kenson was very obviously in the "mental degradation" stage of indoctrination, as she explained the entirety of the Project and exactly how to use it, correctly, to Shepard, for no damned reason. She literally handed the means of her own doom to Shepard. Kenson is, thanks to indoctrination, a complete moron, and I won't trust her word over Harbinger's own.Arrival.
Kenson (whilst being controlled by harbinger and with big yellow eyes):
"We need shepard alive"
Harbinger (speaking directly to Shepard in some poorly explained way):
"Struggle if you must, your mind will be ours"
In short, it'd be kind of nice for Harbinger if Shepard was alive, but it's a low priority at best. And, of course, Arrival may have just had a different writer.
2. Arrival was written by freaking Mac Walters. The same guy who wrote the ending. Your argument is invalid.
Edit:
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 20 octobre 2012 - 04:06 .
#36793
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:07
Object Rho had some kind of knockout field effect that may have had similar properties to indoctrination without actually giving the full package of it, and left a temporary lingering vision effect. Or maybe Shepard just hallucinated that while falling unconscious.1. How is that possible, without being partially indoctrinated him/herself?
#36794
Guest_magnetite_*
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:08
Guest_magnetite_*
Modifié par magnetite, 20 octobre 2012 - 04:09 .
#36795
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:08
1. I'm glad you know Harbinger's motive so well. Why didn't you tell us he just wants to be friends before the Starchild?Xilizhra wrote...
Very well. Shepard being alive is a minor perk that Harbinger will take advantage of, but is far from a priority.We know for a fact Arrival was written by Mac Walters.
Yes. In that one scene. Never anywhere else. Again, I believe it was just Shepard seeing the indoctrination for a moment.She had glowing yellow eyes.
2. You can't "see" indoctrination! That makes no sense! And people think IT is baseless.
#36796
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:09
#36797
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:09
Do you know that for a fact?Xilizhra wrote...
But that makes no sense either. First of all, how, when Kenson lacks implants? Second, why? Assume direct control for something she was going to do anyway, namely imprison Shepard? Did he control her to ensure she did it badly?
#36798
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:09
magnetite wrote...
Just finished reading about Paul Grayson's indoctrination process in the Retribution novel. Quite interesting. Well, maybe not the torturing part, but the details and such.
Don't you wish Bioware used that Kai Leng, instead of Deception's Kai Leng?
#36799
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:10
I'm gleaning Harbinger's motive from all the times it's struck to kill. Which is all of them, except when it could only act through Object Rho and couldn't use lethal force to begin with.1. I'm glad you know Harbinger's motive so well. Why didn't you tell us he just wants to be friends before the Starchild?
Vigil and Vendetta both could. Or it could just be a hallucination.2. You can't "see" indoctrination! That makes no sense! And people think IT is baseless.
Comparing Saren to Garrus, and comparing a Collector to Javik... it isn't that hard to tell.Do you know that for a fact?
Modifié par Xilizhra, 20 octobre 2012 - 04:11 .
#36800
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:10
You know what has hallucinations as a symptom? Indoctrination. Besides, you're saying Object Rho indoctrinates the facility but not Shepard specifically?Xilizhra wrote...
Object Rho had some kind of knockout field effect that may have had similar properties to indoctrination without actually giving the full package of it, and left a temporary lingering vision effect. Or maybe Shepard just hallucinated that while falling unconscious.1. How is that possible, without being partially indoctrinated him/herself?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




