Ugh, I've seen him be far worse than that.AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
He seemed good enough at the beginning, producing productive threads about the ending. Then, he created the control thread, which was his first step down the road of complete lunacy. He delved deeper and deeper into those realms, creating threads like the stargazer support thread, the Normandy crash scene support thread. By the time he created the 2nd ultimate endings support thread, there was nothing left of the old Seival.AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
...And Seival:sick:llbountyhunter wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
Oh cool the Krogan are taking out the Brutes. Awesome, Banshee vs Rachni!
Whoaaa, did you see those two freighters ram that Reaper!?
Etc etc...
And then...."Wake up"
Dammit!! Not again!
I just don't see the interest a year later. Except for pro-enders, who are already happy. So why bother pouring resources into something that will only make the fans who are already happy, happy?
and many IT'ers are happy as well, because they believe it is true. just because there are some who belive either IT is true or not, does no make it so.
and I have not met many (if any) literalists who is happy with the ending, they may not think IT is true, but they still the the endings are garbage.
in fact the only true happy ones are the very Passionate IT'ers......
Can anybody take Seival seriously after ME3?
Then his cult threads about converting "Anti-enders" into "Pro-enders" and moving all IT thread into fan creation forum
Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#38201
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:19
#38202
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:20
estebanus wrote...
Arrival. God, I hated that mission.
Arrival is awesome.
#38203
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:21
If I can paragon interrupt starchild and he just goes oh okay here's the keys to Harbinger, he tends to drift left, would I be happy?
No
#38204
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:21
It wasn't the story in the mission that bothered me, it was more the construction of the levels you had to figt through. It seemed more like a chore to me than anything else.llbountyhunter wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Arrival. God, I hated that mission.demersel wrote...
I don't get it. Whats the big deal? We knew right away, that if IT is any sort of true - we only get something of a confirmation at the end of DLC cycle. If at all in this game and not the next. Now - recent news - about Shepard not being in ME4 (or whatever it is) - if at all true - they are good news. If IT is any truth at all (I say "if" here, just being polite) - then this is them straight out telling us to chill and not to worry - it will be adressed in the DLC. Simple as that. So far only one DLC is out. And 1 - it is awesome, 2 - it is about nothing but indoctrination. Now I bet that Omega WILL not be any sort of IT reveal. But it will be close to it, and it will be awesome. And btw, while we're at it - name one ME DLC that isn't any good? (besides pinnacle - MP has that niche covered)
whats wrong with you?????
#38205
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:23
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
#38206
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:23
So your real beef with the ending is that the catalyst, this AI, actually exists?spotlessvoid wrote...
Estebanus-
If I can paragon interrupt starchild and he just goes oh okay here's the keys to Harbinger, he tends to drift left, would I be happy?
No
#38207
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:23
estebanus wrote...
Arrival. God, I hated that mission.
Arrival is my favourite ME DLC
#38208
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:24
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
#38209
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:27
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
#38210
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:29
estebanus wrote...
]It wasn't the story in the mission that bothered me, it was more the construction of the levels you had to figt through. It seemed more like a chore to me than anything else.
In that case Leviathan was even worse - level design there is just plain terrible.
#38211
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:30
Starchild being some idiot savant AI who can turn the entire galaxy on it's head yet is permanently frozen like some pc, stuck in a logical loop that's immediately retarded to anyone with two neurons .....that's just stupid.
EDI can rewrite her core programing, but the AI who radically altered the entire galaxy is just some sad little shackled bot?
#38212
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:30
AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
Shiala didn't die. Though I do wish she was in the game. Why couldn't we romance Shiala? Or Kasumi? Or Samara?
#38213
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:31
I don't think so.demersel wrote...
estebanus wrote...
]It wasn't the story in the mission that bothered me, it was more the construction of the levels you had to figt through. It seemed more like a chore to me than anything else.
In that case Leviathan was even worse - level design there is just plain terrible.
#38214
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:32
estebanus wrote...
So your real beef with the ending is that the catalyst, this AI, actually exists?spotlessvoid wrote...
Estebanus-
If I can paragon interrupt starchild and he just goes oh okay here's the keys to Harbinger, he tends to drift left, would I be happy?
No
Not my only beef. But yes, starchild, or more accurately his logic is beyond believability
#38215
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:33
Because not every single damn thing out there wants to spread their legs for Shepard. The only one I'd liked to have romance would be Shiala, because a possibly romance was foreshadowed mightily in ME2.BleedingUranium wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
Shiala didn't die. Though I do wish she was in the game. Why couldn't we romance Shiala? Or Kasumi? Or Samara?Those are literally my top three
#38216
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:33
BleedingUranium wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
Shiala didn't die. Though I do wish she was in the game. Why couldn't we romance Shiala? Or Kasumi? Or Samara?Those are literally my top three
I know she didn't die, but I heard she was appear in the game but got cut out like Kal'Reegar
But they could bring Kal back with a Palaven themed DLC
#38217
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:33
estebanus wrote...
I don't think so.demersel wrote...
estebanus wrote...
]It wasn't the story in the mission that bothered me, it was more the construction of the levels you had to figt through. It seemed more like a chore to me than anything else.
In that case Leviathan was even worse - level design there is just plain terrible.
Specifically the mission to get Ann, that one was annoying. If ever a mission dragged on waaaay longer than it should have, it was that one.
#38218
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:35
spotlessvoid wrote...
estebanus wrote...
So your real beef with the ending is that the catalyst, this AI, actually exists?spotlessvoid wrote...
Estebanus-
If I can paragon interrupt starchild and he just goes oh okay here's the keys to Harbinger, he tends to drift left, would I be happy?
No
Not my only beef. But yes, starchild, or more accurately his logic is beyond believability
Well, technically, the reapers always did say that their reasoning was beyond our understanding:wizard:
In all reality though. Ya his reasons are silly and non-sensical. However, the reapers are the bad guys, it is ok for them to have circular logic.
#38219
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:35
#38220
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:36
So theoretically, let's say that you have the possibility to utterly destroy its logic and tell it how flawed and corrupted its very being is to the point where it essentially becomes a laughing stock, and get a destroy ending where only the reapers are killed, and the geth and the rest of the galaxy isn't effected by it at all. Not only that, but you get a reunion scene as well.spotlessvoid wrote...
estebanus wrote...
So your real beef with the ending is that the catalyst, this AI, actually exists?spotlessvoid wrote...
Estebanus-
If I can paragon interrupt starchild and he just goes oh okay here's the keys to Harbinger, he tends to drift left, would I be happy?
No
Not my only beef. But yes, starchild, or more accurately his logic is beyond believability
You'd still hate the ending and call it complete bullcrap and that everything about it sucks?
#38221
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:37
estebanus wrote...
Because not every single damn thing out there wants to spread their legs for Shepard. The only one I'd liked to have romance would be Shiala, because a possibly romance was foreshadowed mightily in ME2.BleedingUranium wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
Shiala didn't die. Though I do wish she was in the game. Why couldn't we romance Shiala? Or Kasumi? Or Samara?Those are literally my top three
Then I vote we trade Allers, Ashley, and Jack for my three
#38222
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:38
I can agree with you on that one. That mission was definitely overdone. Shepard was way too close to Ann from the beginning of that mission for it to take that much time.BleedingUranium wrote...
estebanus wrote...
I don't think so.demersel wrote...
estebanus wrote...
]It wasn't the story in the mission that bothered me, it was more the construction of the levels you had to figt through. It seemed more like a chore to me than anything else.
In that case Leviathan was even worse - level design there is just plain terrible.
Specifically the mission to get Ann, that one was annoying. If ever a mission dragged on waaaay longer than it should have, it was that one.
#38223
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:39
AresKeith wrote...
I know she didn't die, but I heard she was appear in the game but got cut out like Kal'Reegar
But they could bring Kal back with a Palaven themed DLC
Oh, I didn't know that. That's really odd, actually, because her voice actress voices a lot of random people in ME3.
#38224
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:40
Samara alread turned you down, and a justicar tends to mean it when she says no, I reckon. Kasumi has never shown any form of romantic interest in Shepard whatsoever. She'd much rather go for Jacob. The only one that really would make sense would have to be Shiala.BleedingUranium wrote...
estebanus wrote...
Because not every single damn thing out there wants to spread their legs for Shepard. The only one I'd liked to have romance would be Shiala, because a possibly romance was foreshadowed mightily in ME2.BleedingUranium wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
estebanus wrote...
According to the original leaked script of ME3, you were actually supposed to have several missions with former squaddies and other people.AresKeith wrote...
Arrival was pretty Meh for me too, but it did have its good moments with the Stealth type mission
And I would have liked more temperary squadmates in ME3
Yea I knew about that, thats one of things that annoyed me about ME3
And them getting rid of Kal'Reegar and Shiala too
Shiala didn't die. Though I do wish she was in the game. Why couldn't we romance Shiala? Or Kasumi? Or Samara?Those are literally my top three
Then I vote we trade Allers, Ashley, and Jack for my three
So yeah, swap Allers for Shiala!
#38225
Posté 22 octobre 2012 - 07:42
I'd still find it hard to believe he could be that retarded. There would still be massive plot holes. It would have been barely palatable as the launch ending. I'd be pretty disappointed that's the best they could do after a year. I'd also be convinced there never was a plan and everything they said before and after launch was a lie.
So, no. It would be the final nail
Modifié par spotlessvoid, 22 octobre 2012 - 07:43 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





