Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#38976
MegumiAzusa

MegumiAzusa
  • Members
  • 4 238 messages

Davik Kang wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...
I don't think shepard indoctrinated. I think shepard inspired. In all of ME2 shepard is just asking people to join. They choose to for their own personal reasons. Shepard doesn't even pick the people. And not one of them does anything but fight against the reapers in ME3 so they are not indoctrinated. In ME3, shepard tries to get forces to save earth but with each step it becomes a bigger undertaking because he/she has to now stop the genophage and the geth. Nothing there points to indoctrination. 

In what I'm saying, you have to divorce the idea of indoctrination from the Reapers.  If Shepard is indoctrinating people, it is to her side.  'Inspiring' people could be seen as another form of indoctrination.  This is why I'm trying to highlght the idea of getting people to do what you want.  Indcotrination is one method.  But there are others.  It is a special kind of power.

The council are made up of Turian Salarian and Asari who represent 3 kinds of power.  Military might/discipline, knowledge/intelligence, and wealth/persuasion.  This makes the council a force strong enough to get people to ally to its cause.

I wonder if this is why it's called Mass Effect?  An object with more mass in space draws other objects to it, and in turn becomes more massive.  The Council is massive enough, as are the Reapers.  I wonder if Shepard is somehow also (metaphorically speaking) massive enough despite being just one person?  In this way Shepard is an incredible source of power.

Unforunately all this speculating is getting in the way of the first post (whoops).  I am more trying to gather in-game evidence for stuff. Maybe there is just too much.  I'll give it a go though.

Read Revelation, it's interesting how it's stressed over and over how strange it is how smoothly a new race is adopted in the council. Interestingly uplifted races who had no exposure to tech of the last cycle aren't that smooth. Even Javik tells you that, they had the tech from the race before, made the Citadel their HQ, subjugated any other race. Now the Asari, Turians, and Salarians had the most and longest exposure that tech and again made the Citadel their HQ. Other races with enough exposure easily followed and joined the council, races with less exposure like humans are an exception and it doesn't go that smooth. Races like the Krogan or Rachni go to a longer war until they're nearly extinct. The interesting thing here is the Reapers interest in the Rachni, and Harbingers comment about Krogans "Sterilized race, wasted potential." while any other race with more much exposure is called out to be flawed by their very nature. Also Quarians were considered, and they are also not part of the Citadel anymore.

Modifié par MegumiAzusa, 24 octobre 2012 - 02:55 .


#38977
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...
Refusal lets the reapers win as witnessed by Liara's capsule device. Kind of weird that the voice would be pissed when it just won unless it wanted shepard to make one of the choices offered rather than none of them. So is destroy also some kind of illusion? Maybe it doesn't get mad because it can still try to indoctrinate again, like a never ending cycle of illusions if shepard keeps trying to kill the reapers. The 'So be it' actually adds more questions when you think about it. Why does whatever that thing is get mad at that choice but not at destroy?

Is it possible that the Kid's voice could be Leviathan's?  Are we indoctrinated by the Leviathan and not a Reaper?  This would explain why Destroy is shwon as an option.  Also why Refuse disppoints the Kid.

Could the Normandy Drive Core be a Leviathan control object?  It's a very big sphere right?  I know this is pretty speculative but it would be somehting we could look into.  Drive Core also looks a lot like the Reaper btw.

Are there any other objects near the end that could be a source of Leviathan control?


I don't think it was leviathan. I think it was just a reaper that came through clearly as not the innocent seeming AI once shepard refused because the 'spell' had been broken and shepard could hear what it sounded like. 

Actually, regarding refusal, that was added because people wanted that option. I think it's very interesting that BW deliberately choose to give 'so be it' that voice which is reaperish sounding. It's like they took the opportunity to put a very clear clue in there regarding the choices and the AI. It essentially alludes to destroy if you think about it. But they couldn't change anything with destroy or it would give away the whole thing. So they took the opportunity to plant a clue and see the outcome. Now you go back and choose again because that's a really bad ending. All for naught. But when you go back, what ending do you choose after hearing that voice? Do you start thinking about the AI and what its intentions are and what it really is? Do you start to question all the options. For me, destroy then is the only option, but they really couldn't change the three choices. But now we have more clarity about the AI and/or what is taking place during the choice process. It points heavily toward IT. It's in game and is too big a clue to dismiss. I'll say IT for the win.

The mass effect core on the normandy could be an indoctrination device since it was built by cerberus. We do have james asking if we hear that hum. But it probably has to work over a long period of time. It probably opens the doorway to the indoctrination process shepard goes through once that beam hits or once he/she is on the citadel. When is still sketchy to me. Probably the beam, but I dislike that option because that means we technically have no end to the reaper harvest. The beam could leave Shepard in a pile of rubble. But then the reapers are still harvesting.

Unless now the battle is not against the reapers but against shepard's indcotrination, which is a massive change in the objective of the game, the galaxy is pretty much screwed since I'd find it hard to believe that they would add DLC that would extend the destroy ending while also not having people like us say 'but did we really destroy the reapers' when it's done because even if they added DLC post destroy choice, unless it was crystal clear it wasn't an illusion (and the EC DLC seems pretty crystal clear but here we are questioning it), then how do we know anything that comes out after regarding destroy (should such a DLC come out) actually destroy them? It's like we've fallen into a trap that has no win, which is why I prefer to think IT began once in the citadel.

#38978
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Never expressively said, but Hacket is already hitting it with the big guns and when he asks the fleet to hold back, Shepard tells him to continue, to wipe the station out. 

As to why it is never said directly...we are about to hit Earth, **** is going down and what happened to Cronos is completely irrelevant in light of the massive fleet we are bringing to Earth.

Still though given that Hacket is allready shooting at the station and Shepard tells him to continue I think it is a pretty safe bet what happened to Cronos.

I'm not convinced.  We presumably head to Earth ASAP after conquering the station.  We also know that the assets of the proto-Reaper itself is used in the construction of the Crucible!  So to recover that tech and somehwo install it in the Crucible... it seems unlikely that it was just wiped out by big guns.  Impossible even.

Do we ever find out where the Crucible was being built?  On Hackett's private fleet?  Trust me there is something more than fishy going on with this guy.  His rise to power is very similar to the Allaince's, and it is not a simple rags to riches tale.  It almost seems planned.

#38979
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...


I wonder if this is why it's called Mass Effect?  An object with more mass in space draws other objects to it, and in turn becomes more massive.  The Council is massive enough, as are the Reapers.  I wonder if Shepard is somehow also (metaphorically speaking) massive enough despite being just one person?  In this way Shepard is an incredible source of power.

Unforunately all this speculating is getting in the way of the first post (whoops).  I am more trying to gather in-game evidence for stuff.  Maybe there is just too much.  I'll give it a go though.


Actually, when you ask Hackett 'why me?' at one point in those conferences, he says because people were willing to follow shepard to hell and back. They followed on a suicide mission. They followed to ilos. They will follow because shepard has that fire that makes people believe it can be done. I'd say that makes shepard very powerful and extremely dangerous to the reapers.

#38980
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

starlitegirlx wrote...
Actually, when you ask Hackett 'why me?' at one point in those conferences, he says because people were willing to follow shepard to hell and back. They followed on a suicide mission. They followed to ilos. They will follow because shepard has that fire that makes people believe it can be done. I'd say that makes shepard very powerful and extremely dangerous to the reapers.

Or extremely dangerous to everyone else.  If the beam at the end doesn't go to the Citadel at all but is just a trap, a mass human grave yard for the new harvest, and Shepard is the only one who can lead everybody there...

it does point to the idea that everybody really is screwed.  Like Shepard is just the catalyst to speed up the process of everyone getting harvested on Earth.

Modifié par Davik Kang, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:06 .


#38981
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

MegumiAzusa wrote...
Read Revelation, it's interesting how it's stressed over and over how strange it is how smoothly a new race is adopted in the council. Interestingly uplifted races who had no exposure to tech of the last cycle aren't that smooth. Even Javik tells you that, they had the tech from the race before, made the Citadel their HQ, subjugated any other race. Now the Asari, Turians, and Salarians had the most and longest exposure that tech and again made the Citadel their HQ. Other races with enough exposure easily followed and joined the council, races with less exposure like humans are an exception and it doesn't go that smooth. Races like the Krogan or Rachni go to a longer war until they're nearly extinct. The interesting thing here is the Reapers interest in the Rachni, and Harbingers comment about Krogans "Sterilized race, wasted potential." while any other race with more much exposure is called out to be flawed by their very nature. Also Quarians were considered, and they are also not part of the Citadel anymore.

This is very interesting, thank you.

#38982
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages

demersel wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...
These ideas are pretty interesting and may well turn out to be true.  The hard part is finding evidence for them.  We need to find enough in-game evidence to support the stuff we think so that it becomes a reasonable interpretation.
 And I don't think one person can do this alone, which is why I'm hoping we can get enough people to work togteher and figure all this out.


Before we start looking for evidence - we need to set our story straight - if noly for the fact so we know what to look for as evidence.

If you trie to proof/support your theories using this kind of plan, then it will fail and is flawed.
Find the evidence and try to adjust your theory according to the presented facts. The other way round would be foolish and fan fiction.

#38983
NebuchadnezzaRT

NebuchadnezzaRT
  • Members
  • 485 messages
Show just came on tv, 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.

I can see why conspiracy theorists get a bad rep.

But I love you guys :)

EDIT: Restrider, when did you change your avatar?

Modifié par NebuchadnezzaRT, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:12 .


#38984
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...
Actually, when you ask Hackett 'why me?' at one point in those conferences, he says because people were willing to follow shepard to hell and back. They followed on a suicide mission. They followed to ilos. They will follow because shepard has that fire that makes people believe it can be done. I'd say that makes shepard very powerful and extremely dangerous to the reapers.

Or extremely dangerous to everyone else.  If the beam at the end doesn't go to the Citadel at all but is just a trap, a mass human grave yard for the new harvest, and Shepard is the only one who can lead everybody there...

it does point to the idea that everybody really is screwed.  Like Shepard is just the catalyst to speed up the process of everyone getting harvested on Earth.


Scary stuff. But looks like the citadel.

Honestly, the whole thing is so convoluted at this point that I don't know what is happening when. Once that beam hits shepard all bets are off and nothing 'shown' can be accepted at real or truth. And if you are an ITer then nothing that happens after that gives any kind of closure since we don't know what exactly is happening other than an indoctrination attempt where choosing destroy gives you a breath scene. And that could even be a dying breath. Or a breath after suviving an indoctrination attempt and getting hit by a beam that landed you half buried in a pile of rubble.

I'd almost prefer going back to a state of ignorant bliss on this one, but now that we've got that voice on refusal, it's really impossible to do that.

Oh well, if the reapers destroy everything, at least I know it wasn't my shepard's fault. She did her best to stop it but damn that indoctrination.

Edited to add: what's worse is that I doubt there will ever be closure on this one. Omega might give info but closure as to killing the reapers is still sketchy unless you assume that choosing destroy really does destroy them even if IT started when the beam hit you. What would we call that? Mind magic? Imagining you destroy the reapers in an indoctrination attempt actually does destroy the reapers? Oh hell, if BW can pull the crap it has then I can create Mind Magic.

Modifié par starlitegirlx, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:18 .


#38985
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages
Somehow always when I write a huge wall of text, it ends up at the bottom of a page, and so it gets overlooked/ignored.

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:22 .


#38986
BeastSaver

BeastSaver
  • Members
  • 513 messages

Davik Kang wrote...

Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
Never expressively said, but Hacket is already hitting it with the big guns and when he asks the fleet to hold back, Shepard tells him to continue, to wipe the station out. 

As to why it is never said directly...we are about to hit Earth, **** is going down and what happened to Cronos is completely irrelevant in light of the massive fleet we are bringing to Earth.

Still though given that Hacket is allready shooting at the station and Shepard tells him to continue I think it is a pretty safe bet what happened to Cronos.

I'm not convinced.  We presumably head to Earth ASAP after conquering the station.  We also know that the assets of the proto-Reaper itself is used in the construction of the Crucible!  So to recover that tech and somehwo install it in the Crucible... it seems unlikely that it was just wiped out by big guns.  Impossible even.

Do we ever find out where the Crucible was being built?  On Hackett's private fleet?  Trust me there is something more than fishy going on with this guy.  His rise to power is very similar to the Allaince's, and it is not a simple rags to riches tale.  It almost seems planned.


Everything in-game happens pretty much instantaniously after the mission is accomplished. As soon as you deliver the kakliosaur dna to the salarian, you have full-grown kakliosaurs being riden by krogan, as soon as you deliver the reaper code fragment to the asari they are using it to predict reaper movement, etc. Conversely, nothing happens until Shepard gets there, with very few instances, such as Grissom Academy.

#38987
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

Somehow always when I write a huge wall of text, it ends up at the bottom of a page, and so it gets overlooked/ignored.


Where is it? I'll read it! You always put forth good stuff I love to read.

#38988
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages
It's near the bottom of the previous page. =)

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:23 .


#38989
CDR David Shepard

CDR David Shepard
  • Members
  • 1 197 messages
I definitely do NOT believe that everything after the beam hit was an indoctrination attempt.

However, I still think (and will continue to believe) that the whole conversation with the starchild was the indoctrination attempt.

Talking to EDI right before the final push...she asks Shepard how they think they could possibly win...and Shepard states along the lines of that...the Reapers have the Citadel...they think they have won.

This is how I feel about the starchild covnersation being an indoctrination attempt.

At that point...Shepard believes they had done it...and had no more reason to fight physically or mentally.

"They have the citadel...they believe they have won"

This is how they were finally able to break through Shepards indoctrination resistance...in my opinion.

Modifié par CDR David Shepard, 24 octobre 2012 - 03:44 .


#38990
NebuchadnezzaRT

NebuchadnezzaRT
  • Members
  • 485 messages

starlitegirlx wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...
Actually, when you ask Hackett 'why me?' at one point in those conferences, he says because people were willing to follow shepard to hell and back. They followed on a suicide mission. They followed to ilos. They will follow because shepard has that fire that makes people believe it can be done. I'd say that makes shepard very powerful and extremely dangerous to the reapers.

Or extremely dangerous to everyone else.  If the beam at the end doesn't go to the Citadel at all but is just a trap, a mass human grave yard for the new harvest, and Shepard is the only one who can lead everybody there...

it does point to the idea that everybody really is screwed.  Like Shepard is just the catalyst to speed up the process of everyone getting harvested on Earth.


Scary stuff. But looks like the citadel.

Honestly, the whole thing is so convoluted at this point that I don't know what is happening when. Once that beam hits shepard all bets are off and nothing 'shown' can be accepted at real or truth. And if you are an ITer then nothing that happens after that gives any kind of closure since we don't know what exactly is happening other than an indoctrination attempt where choosing destroy gives you a breath scene. And that could even be a dying breath. Or a breath after suviving an indoctrination attempt and getting hit by a beam that landed you half buried in a pile of rubble.

I'd almost prefer going back to a state of ignorant bliss on this one, but now that we've got that voice on refusal, it's really impossible to do that.

Oh well, if the reapers destroy everything, at least I know it wasn't my shepard's fault. She did her best to stop it but damn that indoctrination.

I think that is why some people really don't like IT.

They know Bioware is capable of making great games, so why would they add this "master plan" that leaves this wonderful franchise without an ending?

While many non-ITers will chalk up our ending (the breathe scene, per se not an ending but the only "real" scene at the end of the game) to "head canon" so in reality, ending-wise, the burden of proof is on us ITers (and Davik I know your feeling on IT haha). That is why there have been so many variations on what happens after the indoctrination scene, such as the might of the fleet coming down on Harbinger to put the Reaper fleet in disarray.

In turn though there are major inconsistancies throughout the series that can only come to turn with IT.

Never accept bad writing or lazy staff as the answer. 

#38991
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages

NebuchadnezzaRT wrote...

Show just came on tv, 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.

I can see why conspiracy theorists get a bad rep.

But I love you guys :)

EDIT: Restrider, when did you change your avatar?

This should answer your question...

#38992
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages
Aight, I'm off for now folks. I'll be back later today.

Don't hesitate to respond to me because I'm gone, I will read the pages I missed. =)

Toodles!

#38993
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

@ starlitegirlx:

Even though the 'SO BE IT' voice is just Mark Meer's, that doesn't necessarily mean the child isn't Harbinger.

For one, just the fact that his voice changes is an indication that he's just posing as this innocent little kid. He clearly drops his guise for a second, and it's obvious he's actually something else.

I think the simple reason it's not Harbinger's voice is that it would immediately clue Shepard in and break the illusion.

Think about it, revealing the kid to be Harbinger would confirm IT.


But then doesn't having the voice change to something that to me sounds a lot like a reaper also support IT. Or the fact that the voice changes AT ALL supports IT. It alludes to the fact that this AI that has been posing as a child may not be anything but an indoctrination attempt that lies and manipulates. There's nothing else that makes sense. If the voice changes in one choice, then the representation as a child AI is a lie which holds across all choices because the child is the same, it's just the response that is different.


I agree, the voice changing to a Reaper voice does support IT, however, when I confronted literalists with this, they were just like 'Well duh, he's a Reaper AI, he just gets mad because you don't want to help find a solution'.

starlitegirlx wrote...

Oh wait, just had a thought. If the AI representation gets pissed with a refusal but not with destroy, then that implies that there is something amiss with destroy. Refusal is outright rejection of the illusion as a whole one could argue. "I'm not playing this game'" sort of thing. With Destroy, you do play along. But you also come out of the illusions. But why does it not trigger the same kind of anger from whatever reaper type thing was playing the AI? That always bugged me. You would think destroy would ****** it off equally. So why doesn't it? Especially if it is about to be destroyed or you are about to break out of the illusion. Is this lazy writing, a clue, or what? It makes no sense that destroy doesn't trigger anger unless we're not looking closely at refusal and destroy and we're missing something.

Refusal lets the reapers win as witnessed by Liara's capsule device. Kind of weird that the voice would be pissed when it just won unless it wanted shepard to make one of the choices offered rather than none of them. So is destroy also some kind of illusion? Maybe it doesn't get mad because it can still try to indoctrinate again, like a never ending cycle of illusions if shepard keeps trying to kill the reapers. The 'So be it' actually adds more questions when you think about it. Why does whatever that thing is get mad at that choice but not at destroy?


I firmly believe (ever since Leviathan established Reapers can build complicated illusions from your memories) that Shepard isn't actually on the Citadel. It is all a mental battle inside Shepard's mind. Especially because when Shepard zaps onto the Citadel, the sound effect that plays is the exact same sound effect that is used in Leviathan when going in and out of the mind control.

So, even when you shoot the tube in destroy, everything you see is just an illusion. Shepard wasn't on the Citadel. The crucible wasn't even used.

So, if you pick destroy, the child is not going to go 'OHNOZ' because that would instantly give away IT, and reveal that he doesn't want you to do that. The illusion is that all three endings are legit, so having the child go nuts in destroy would instantly reveal IT. The fact that he gets mad in refuse is simply because he's frustrated in a  "You could have been useful, Shepard." kind of way.

I am thinking that the three choices, as presented to Shepard, are reversed. The Reaper AI is asking you if you:

1. Want to be controlled (brainwashed, sleeper agent, etc.)
2. Want to be synthesized (upgraded with Reaper tech, like Saren and TIM and the Collectors, or perhaps even become part of a Reaper)
3. Want to be destroyed

I came to this conclusion because of Harbinger's line in the Retaliation trailer. (See my signature)

The outcome is inevitable. They will succumb (ctrl) and ascend (synth).... or they will be annihilated (destroy).

Now, choosing destroy is the least favourable to the Reapers, because it would mean they couldn't use you, but more importantly, it would also mean you would resists indoctrination, because you stick to your plan and still intend to destroy the Reapers.

My guess is that if the indoctrination attempt fails, you would normally die. Your mind would be destroyed. The only reason Shepard survives this in high EMS is because (s)he's got an extraordinary amount of willpower (which is illustrated by the amount of war assets you managed to get together).

I don't believe there will actually be post-breath scene content. I would like it, but I don't believe in it.

I think we are meant to believe that we won by beating the Reapers' ultimate weapon: indoctrination.


Found your wall of text and damn, what a good one!

I've been starting to lean in this direction thought wise though I haven't posted it or I don't think I have. The breath scene pretty much implies screwed, but at least shepard isn't a willing reaper.

I think I would prefer lower EMS at that point since it doesn't matter and I'd prefer my shepard to not end up as a reaper. No more chasing assets for me. Funny thing, I often thought Ash in my games got the better deal. She never lived to see this hell but died a hero and restored her family name.

Of course, if the reapers survive and they do enough mass effects and keep moving them forward in time, at some point we will have to face them again, though maybe not for a few more trilogies.

#38994
NebuchadnezzaRT

NebuchadnezzaRT
  • Members
  • 485 messages

Restrider wrote...

NebuchadnezzaRT wrote...

Show just came on tv, 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.

I can see why conspiracy theorists get a bad rep.

But I love you guys :)

EDIT: Restrider, when did you change your avatar?

This should answer your question...


Ah, very nice, though I thought Hellish or Fellish had an Illusive Man avatar, haha not like they pop up here very often anyway

#38995
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

NebuchadnezzaRT wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

starlitegirlx wrote...
Actually, when you ask Hackett 'why me?' at one point in those conferences, he says because people were willing to follow shepard to hell and back. They followed on a suicide mission. They followed to ilos. They will follow because shepard has that fire that makes people believe it can be done. I'd say that makes shepard very powerful and extremely dangerous to the reapers.

Or extremely dangerous to everyone else.  If the beam at the end doesn't go to the Citadel at all but is just a trap, a mass human grave yard for the new harvest, and Shepard is the only one who can lead everybody there...

it does point to the idea that everybody really is screwed.  Like Shepard is just the catalyst to speed up the process of everyone getting harvested on Earth.


Scary stuff. But looks like the citadel.

Honestly, the whole thing is so convoluted at this point that I don't know what is happening when. Once that beam hits shepard all bets are off and nothing 'shown' can be accepted at real or truth. And if you are an ITer then nothing that happens after that gives any kind of closure since we don't know what exactly is happening other than an indoctrination attempt where choosing destroy gives you a breath scene. And that could even be a dying breath. Or a breath after suviving an indoctrination attempt and getting hit by a beam that landed you half buried in a pile of rubble.

I'd almost prefer going back to a state of ignorant bliss on this one, but now that we've got that voice on refusal, it's really impossible to do that.

Oh well, if the reapers destroy everything, at least I know it wasn't my shepard's fault. She did her best to stop it but damn that indoctrination.

I think that is why some people really don't like IT.

They know Bioware is capable of making great games, so why would they add this "master plan" that leaves this wonderful franchise without an ending?

While many non-ITers will chalk up our ending (the breathe scene, per se not an ending but the only "real" scene at the end of the game) to "head canon" so in reality, ending-wise, the burden of proof is on us ITers (and Davik I know your feeling on IT haha). That is why there have been so many variations on what happens after the indoctrination scene, such as the might of the fleet coming down on Harbinger to put the Reaper fleet in disarray.

In turn though there are major inconsistancies throughout the series that can only come to turn with IT.

Never accept bad writing or lazy staff as the answer. 


You are right regarding why people wouldn't choose to believe IT. It's depressing. All that work for naught. Then again, maybe since we are playing shepard it was really always about us and our journey as shepard. We think it's about beating the reapers, but there are scenes where most everyone leans toward defeat and knowing they likely won't win. So maybe it's not about anything but shepard not getting indoctrinated and going out having personally won his/her battle against the reapers which started way back on eden prime and shepard went through a lot of hell since them.

#38996
Either.Ardrey

Either.Ardrey
  • Members
  • 473 messages

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Just some speculative symbolism behind the character classes that I noticed.  Just take a look, what does it look like to you:

Posted Image  Pulling away freeing yourself from some type of machine

Posted Image Hidden "illusive" character image and what looked like a collector

Posted Image Why does this shape remind me of a Reaper? 

Posted Image Interestingly picture next to the drone looks kinda like the crucible

Posted Image I couldn't place this but similar to falling into a void

Posted Image Interestingly reminds me of the 3 choices with the middle accending

I'm not putting a lot into this really but just speculating about some minor details in the artwork.  I know I'm probably reading into some things

I don't know if anyone's answered this yet (I'm 9+ hours behind), but here goes:

Soldier: Close-up of Back-Right shoulder of Shepard's standard armor and Adrenaline Rush icon.
Infiltrator: Collector in sniper rifle scope and Tactical Cloak icon.
Sentinel: Tech Armor Close-up and Tech Armor icon.
Engineer: Drone activating(?) and Combat Drone icon.
Adept: Closeup of Singularity and Singularity icon.
Vanguard: Biotic trail from Biotic Charge and Biotic Charge icon.

#38997
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

demersel wrote...

Rankincountry wrote...

A significant theme in ME1 is the disruption caused to the galactic status quo by humanity - in the space of a single generation from the first contact war (barely a blink to an Asari, shocking even to the quick thinking and fast living Salarians) humans have gone from tentative steps to colonising from their dilapidated homeworld (the codex description of Earth is clear that the gap between rich and poor remains gigantic and that pollution is severe) to a seat on the council. This would be unthinkable for any other species.

Even in the  first contact war, human ships were less numerous than the turians but our fleets and soldiers were a qualitative match for the council's mightiest military force. We're like the ultimate gatecrashers - bursting right through the front door, taking over the stereo and changing the whole feel of the party.

Shepard is the avatar of this disruptive, unpredictable species - I think you're on to something here.


Ok. Everybody already hates me here, but i have to point out - yes this is true and yes this is an anomaly - humanity'sprogress is too fast. It is as if something was uplifting it. guiding it. 

And the period between the end of first contact war, to the start of mass effect one - is exaclty the same that Illusive man been active as illusive man - it happened after he got exposed to that artifact. 

He straight out tells you - his goal is uplifting humanity and ensuring it's domination.  


I think I agree with this part (not your 'TIM is a Reapah!' idea previously though).

I think it has effectively been written that Jack Harper has pushed humanity's progress ever since the First Contact War. Cerberus therefore is his more private organization, but he has tendrils across the entire Alliance and Earth Government.

"Cerberus IS humanity" :mellow:

#38998
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

CmdrShep80 wrote...

Just some speculative symbolism behind the character classes that I noticed.  Just take a look, what does it look like to you:

Posted Image  Pulling away freeing yourself from some type of machine

Posted Image Hidden "illusive" character image and what looked like a collector

Posted Image Why does this shape remind me of a Reaper? 

Posted Image Interestingly picture next to the drone looks kinda like the crucible

Posted Image I couldn't place this but similar to falling into a void

Posted Image Interestingly reminds me of the 3 choices with the middle accending


I think adept is the dark energy theory that was supposed to be the story until it was leaked. They should have stuck with it, leaked or not. Fans would play it. Fans play a lot of stuff they know the ending to over and over and even buy games where the ending is always pretty much the same.

These images were for ME2 and that was probably when they already knew Dark energy was coming up.

I think I really would have preferred Dark Energy because I don't think they were able to make what we have as good as what we would have had and honestly, I would have liked to see that storyline.

#38999
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

demersel wrote...

Rankincountry wrote...
That's a bit strong - I certainly don't hate you. You do have some barmy notions, though ;). But yeah, the only other species that achieved anything like the advances made by humanity was, of course, the Krogan. And of course, they were being manipulated all the way. So I don't think it's a huge leap to think that there is something behind humanity's dizzying ascent to power. The convenience of the Prothean archive both historically and with the crucible designs, TIM... and if we continue the thought that behind TIM is not Harbinger but Leviathan, maybe humanity is Leviathan's last throw of the dice - a species driven, courageous and violent enough to stop the reapers, but still susceptible to Thralldom? 

Maybe I'm reaching here, I don't know, but the more I think about this the more I feel like there's something to it.


Except cerberus research projects do not resemble that of leviathan's (and to make the difference even more apparent - the leviathans also are shown using humans - and that is completely different).  So no, I think leviathans being the ones uplifting humanity through Illusive man are even less likely than Illusive man actually being a front for damaged reaper - 9he was so baldy damaged, that when it got in contact with the Jack Harper - something new was born - an intelligence with all the knowledge and power of a reaper, yet not binded by the reaper logic) 


Thank you. You''re back to realistic ideas now :P

Cerberus/TIM is, imo, especially if IT is right, a *unique force*.

It's not the 'indoctrinated agents' of each cycle, like the game maybe tries to make us believe.

TIM = taking influence and intelligence from REAPERS, but information and intent from LEVIATHAN info. He talks WAY too much about 'apex species' stuff for that to be otherwise, imo.

I have a feeling that if the story goes to continue, Cerberus may be the 'bad guy choice' to players who think in black and white, but maybe, just maybe, they really do have a 'grey' plan that may work.

Depends on how geniuine ME3's ending is as the ending of Shepard's/Cerberus's story..

#39000
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...

demersel wrote...
I'm game. )))

Hrothdane wrote...
My answer is in my signature :D

Ok good, thanks.  The stuff demersel has been talking about recently is directly linked to many of the things I've been thinking about.  I'll go into these briefly here so that at least you've an idea of what I'm going on about before I make the thread.

First, TIM is a Reaper.  I don't think he's a Reaper.  If we find eveidence to the contrary, great.  But one thing I'm looking at is the galactic war as a whole, and the power players within it.  One is Verberus.  Another is the Reapers.  There's also Leviathan.  And the Council.  

This war isn't us and them.  There are lots of factions who desire power.  But which faction have I not mentioned yet?  Is it 'humnaity'?  It is not.  It is the Systems Alliance.

I have been looking into the Systems Alliance and there is a lot of stuff that suggests they are not the 'good guy side' which we always presume them to be.  I won't go into it all here - it'll need its own thread - but the point is, many of the factions are not so different to the Reapers themselves.  More accurately, they are one of many power players looking to gain the upper hand, an upper hand that can only be gained by war.


Another thing I'm looking at is how these various powers see Shepard as one of the most powerful pieces on the board,a nd how they hope to win her to their own side.  IT is all about the Reapers doing this.

In ME1, we work for the Council.  In ME2, we work for Cerberus.  In ME3, we work for the Systems Alliance.  Not only that, but in ME3 we have the Turian-built Normandy, we have Spectre status giving us Council power, and we have a new ship and synthetic/cybernetci implants provided for us by Cerberus.  Shepard is becoming the ultimate soldier and who controls him is key.

Food for thought before I go into it - Hackett is an extremely suspicious character, so I want to look at him, his motives and his actions in more detail.  The Council is also a point of interest, especially in how they use Turian and Salarian skills to their advantage and how ultimately they have the Asari at the peak.  I want to go into Indoctrination as a whole, not just how it's used by the Reapers.  I also want to look at the endings and what they might imply.

It'll need multiple threads cos there's too much to go into in one go.  But the point of it all will be to have various good people of BSN working together to figure it out.  At the moment BSN is split into factions, and it is really hard for a small faction to look at all this stuff.  With more people working together, we might be able to figure out a lot more than what we have so far.


Yeah, while Hackett is ...inspiring, there's always been strange stuff about him.

This stuff doesn't mean 'Alliance is da enemy!' but more 'like any faction, its withholding information (see Asari, Turians, etc etc etc)'