Ce sujet est fermé
Guest_starlitegirlx_*
BatmanTurian wrote...
jojon2se wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
...
You do realize that a piece of literature can infer something and not come out and say it.
...
Go back a page or two, and you'll find yourself rather aggressively lambasting people, for not corroborating their ideas with solid empirical evidence. You are not really contradicting yourself, but one could be forgiven for detecting a slight self-bias and lack of empathy.
Point out to people when their argument falter, by all means, but try to do it by reasoning with them -- a confrontative tone will inevitably trigger an instinctive, defensive response and then you'll never get through - more likely you'll risk finding yourself vitrifying and becoming just as unreasonable and close minded as you see them (EDIT: ...and coming to see them that way and becoming annoyed, would be a symptom of that - raise warning flags).
That's an important part of what I, for my part, take away from the NYTimes article you posted.
As you can see; I'm lousy at this myself.
Well, it was 4 in the morning and I wasn't thinking clearly. As for solid empirical evidence, that doesn't always necessarily apply in literature, because the Author really does infer things without coming out and saying it, such as Joker's sister at Tiptree being turned into a husk.
Where and when is this conversation taking place. I've seen in mentioned and want to see it in game, but I always miss it or can't find it.
Retour en haut
