@Rif (as I don't want quote pyramid

)
1. Shepard is standing likely on London. In the *daytime*. With Reapers not standing, but seemingly on a directed path downwards. With the ground looking like the Shepard_Lives video. To me at least, this indicates *something* happens which we haven't seen in-game yet, that severely messes with the Reapers.
Doesn't mean an instant 'on/off' switch, but I think it could mean we really screw with them enough to make this 'harvest'... a real war. Hey, I know, speculation, but the tone and details of that and other pics by Bioware tell a very different picture than what we see in-game, even in the Destroy ending itself.
2. Bar in Rio... meet me at the bar... drinks are on me. ????
You think Bioware would make *several* references to Rio? That would be far too blunt.
But my point was that Bioware seems to be strongly hinting that the story is NOT done yet, and we have yet one more location...one more story... to make.
Doesn't need to be a ME4, but in fact a conclusion DLC. Bioware can disclaim this stuff all they want, but we know their record.
3. Sadly... if the ending itself is what I think it is, Liara isn't safe from Bioware's writing. Doesn't mean she'll die in an indoctrinated mess though, don't get me wrong. I think Shepard's allies are Shepard's allies!
...I just also think that the Council standoff with the VS is a taste of what is possible. Just possible.
4. Bioware isn't just dropping Mass Effect, and imo they won't be wasting time on a side-story or RTS or recreation of the First Contact War. I strongly feel that the story will continue, even if Shepard's story (or at least story focus) will end.