I was like, "dude, am I dead? that's a lot of blood"
Modifié par Bill Casey, 27 octobre 2012 - 05:51 .
Modifié par Bill Casey, 27 octobre 2012 - 05:51 .
lolRifneno wrote...
Well BW seems to be taking a liking to anime now, a genre where the average person has approx. 50 gallons of blood.
Guest_magnetite_*
Bill Casey wrote...
First thing you notice after the white light is Shepard's a stain on the carpet...
I was like, "dude, am I dead? that's a lot of blood"
Modifié par magnetite, 27 octobre 2012 - 06:21 .
Modifié par Gallifreya, 27 octobre 2012 - 06:37 .
SwobyJ wrote...
Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
paxxton wrote...
Hackett is more indoctrinated than Shepard, TIM and Rana Thanoptis combined! Everybody accuses other obvious candidates for indoctrination but seems to overlook the one character that poses as a beacon of righteousness. And that's exactly where indoctrination would go unnoticed by anyone.SwobyJ wrote...
social.bioware.com/898431/polls/41016/
Hacket poll is out.
Seems at minimum, 1/4-1/3 of players find Hackett at least a *bit* suspicious.
Still very outnumbered by those who don't think that at all.
Two simple question regarding Hackett beeing Indoctrinated, when and how?
I must be sounding like a broken record by now, but Hacket has for everything we are shown in all three Mass Effect games had zero contact with Reaper tech and no direct proximity to a Reaper.
He is a fleet Admiral to the bone, we have never seen him off a ship, never had him mentioned as beeing anywhere but on a ship, no groud missions, nothing. Beyond that he spends allmost all of ME3 overlooking the Crucible project safely hidden away from the Reaper and even as we hit Earth he is still on a ship.
As I allready said Hacket has no known contact with any kind of Reaper tech and if you ask me some of the worst storytelling you can do is making a reval which is not backed by player knowledge in at least some way. But then again under a littral perspective they allready did that.
Yeah it gets to me too.
Here's a few things, just randomish info:
-He was born in South America
-He seemingly wasn't on Arcturus Station when the Reapers attacked and destroyed it
-"His rare ascent from enlisted man to admiral remains an Alliance legend." (now this part could be curious...)
-"Hackett is one of the three officers who recommends Commander Shepard as the first human Spectre." (so he's obviously had an eye on you from the beginning)
-"After Liara T'Soni's confrontation with the Shadow Broker,
if Shepard did not pursue a romance with Liara, she mentions that
Hackett recovered Shepard's dog tags and passed them on to her so that
she could return them to their rightful owner" (wait, where did he get them? Who recovered his body first? Just wondering.)
-"Hackett expresses his distaste at the Illusive Man's
aim to control the Reapers, asserting that he is trying to tame a shark
and that the whole galaxy could end up paying for his misguided intent.
He orders the Commander to kill him" (Remember that a shark is an apex predator. So it's not just TIM making reference to apex predators now, just so we know now.)
-“Never before have so many come together from all quarters of the
galaxy. But never before have we faced an enemy such as this. The
Reapers will show us no mercy, we must give them no quarter. They will
terrorize our populations. We must stand fast in the face of that
terror. They will advance until our last city falls, but we will not
fall. We will prevail. Each of us will be defined by our actions in the
coming battle. Stand fast, stand strong. Stand together. Hackett out.[2]”
I think if he's indoctrinated, its at a VERY VERY low level. Alternatively... he's not indoctrinated, but instead quite willing to use the Alliance to facilitate (start) and fill in any power vaccum in the galaxy, in a much more 'utilitarian' way than Cerberus ever would.
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Could the reason for the surprise visit and armed guards on the Normandy be because he suspects Shepard may have fallen under indoctrination? He just doesn't say anthing about it directly to Shepard (and since we play as Shepard we would not know either)
Guest_magnetite_*
Gallifreya wrote...
Here's something fun... For the loading screen that gives tips, are those bread crumbs on either side of the coffee cup? If not, what are they?
It just made me think, "Follow the bread crumbs and wake up."
Because coffee. And bread crumbs. And because it's the screen that gives advice. HEHEM.

Modifié par magnetite, 27 octobre 2012 - 07:06 .
Rifneno wrote...
Damnit. I was just watching the trailers again (because they're awesome) and I noticed something for the first time... the marketing campaign was all about taking back Earth. Just Earth. They never told us we'd defeat the Reapers entirely, or even stop this harvest. Earth was all we were promised.
Guest_magnetite_*
Modifié par magnetite, 27 octobre 2012 - 07:03 .
magnetite wrote...
Bill Casey wrote...
First thing you notice after the white light is Shepard's a stain on the carpet...
I was like, "dude, am I dead? that's a lot of blood"
The camera makes a point to show you the amount of blood. (pause it)
Modifié par Krimzie, 27 octobre 2012 - 07:10 .
Guest_magnetite_*
Krimzie wrote...
Yeah, that puddle of blood is so blatantly CSI-sized fatal amount right there...
Meanwhile, I don't know if the quality of audio on this video is better or something, but I can hear Makos driving away at 0:38 clearly now! Silly ears. Creepy stuff.
Modifié par magnetite, 27 octobre 2012 - 07:23 .
magnetite wrote...
Krimzie wrote...
Yeah, that puddle of blood is so blatantly CSI-sized fatal amount right there...
Meanwhile, I don't know if the quality of audio on this video is better or something, but I can hear Makos driving away at 0:38 clearly now! Silly ears. Creepy stuff.
Sticks out like a sore thumb.
I couldn't hear anything, but like you said it's pretty faint (audio quality). That, or I'm going deaf.
The sound effects get a bit different around the 0:39-0:40 mark, but I couldn't hear any Mako or anything.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
The point why I post here rather then in other threads is the topic is
generated as an open question. It encompasses any theory that is made.
Other topics only allow discussion about their narrow interpretation.
That is also why I'm puzzled when someone is told to create their own
thread.
MegumiAzusa wrote...
--- snip ---
There is the chance the Reapers want to use Shepard for something special, but if they wanted to they could just assume direct control.
Krimzie wrote...
magnetite wrote...
Krimzie wrote...
Yeah, that puddle of blood is so blatantly CSI-sized fatal amount right there...
Meanwhile, I don't know if the quality of audio on this video is better or something, but I can hear Makos driving away at 0:38 clearly now! Silly ears. Creepy stuff.
Sticks out like a sore thumb.
I couldn't hear anything, but like you said it's pretty faint (audio quality). That, or I'm going deaf.
The sound effects get a bit different around the 0:39-0:40 mark, but I couldn't hear any Mako or anything.
I haven't slept for 24 hours, so I could be hallucinating, but you don't think the whirr at 38 seconds sounds very close to http://www.youtube.c...lNxkn7Y#t=0m14s? I could be projecting since I'm staring at crashed Makos in that scene..
Lakeshow1986 wrote...
I know this is pretty obvious but the fact that in the breathe scene there are whispers! Whispers that abruptly stop the moment Shepard takes that gasp.
What logical reason could there be for those whispers without the IT explaining it?
Lakeshow1986 wrote...
Ah ignore me, it must have been edited in from someone on youtube...
Who knows, if this was really intentional, fleshed out and planned, this might have impact even in sciences like psychology, anthropology and political studies.starlitegirlx wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
spotlessvoid wrote...
The thing is it's a long personalized trilogy with a huge emotional investment in all the characters, especially the protagonist. It's not some trippy movie where you don't know exactly what is really going on, but you're not that attached to the characters that it supersedes your appreciation of the art factor of the ambiguous ending. The highly emotional impact of the characters and their relationship with the protagonist you've been shaping for hundreds of hours shouldn't be abandoned in the name of artsy vagueness, especially when there is that tremendous amount of ambiguity about everything. I understand letting things run their course, but the point has been made and this story deserves more answers than what we got
Shameless,I know.
My point is the indoctrination of the player base has been wildly successful. Time to take the next step and blow their minds. There really should be an explanation provided on what actually happened because it's too open ended. Things need to be clarified at least somewhat
That's my thinking. Also, it then is elevated beyond what it is. Any media that can pull off such a masterfully done mindscrew to the point where only a minority got it until the final reveal is truly one that people will never forget and will have a kind of legendary status.
Guest_Sareth Cousland_*
Modifié par Sareth Cousland, 27 octobre 2012 - 10:53 .