80611 réponses à ce sujet

[spotlessvoid]

MB:

It would have to be a pretty fancy explanation of how he's on the citadel lol. Honestly, if it makes sense and bashes synthesis to little bits I would probably be ok with it

[Davik Kang]

My response wan't anywhere near as elegant and explanatory as I'd hoped... to summarise, I said IT is a valid explanation for the ending, hence why Bioware won't debunk it... that the Kid chamber is a dream, but the consequences are somewhat real... and I didn't say, but should have said, that the indoctrination is a last gasp thing after they fail to kill Shep normally (conventionally hahaha - the Reapers are unable to stop Shepard conventionally...)

Anyway I gotta sleep. Tried bronze twice more and died on rounds 10 and 11. Remind me not to run straight at a Banshee even when I'm cloaked...

[byne]

Have I missed anything good in the last couple of days?

[LazyTechGuy]

Priestly mentioned 'Project X' at an Expo but was likely referring to something not ME-related.

[ZerebusPrime]

Is it wrong that I hope that Project X involves lots of giant robots?

[Davik Kang]

ZerebusPrime wrote...
Is it wrong that I hope that Project X involves lots of giant robots?

Grimlock, Snarl, Sludge, Slag and Swoop.

[BleedingUranium]

byne wrote...

Have I missed anything good in the last couple of days?

You missed the second-to-last Red vs Blue episode of the season tomorrow night.

[Humakt83]

This is worth couple chuckles:

http://masseffect.wi...Cut_Content.ogg

Modifié par Humakt83, 29 octobre 2012 - 03:53 .

[Bill Casey]

Pick an ending...

Control --- Synthesis --- Destroy

[DoomsdayDevice]

Humakt83 wrote...

This is worth couple chuckles:

http://masseffect.wi...Cut_Content.ogg

"Everything would be so much simpler if we all had the same DNA, but nooooooooooo. The universe loves diversity!"

[DoomsdayDevice]

Bill Casey wrote...

Pick an ending...

Control --- Synthesis --- Destroy

Haha.

Bekenstein wake? 

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 29 octobre 2012 - 04:03 .

[BleedingUranium]

magnetite wrote...

byne wrote...

Have I missed anything good in the last couple of days?

Check out my Synthesis explanation video on the previous page. That ought to convert a few of them to our cause. 

Just finished it, very cool

[AlexKavern]

Kai Leng: "We evolve or we die, those are the options!"

Shepard: "We fight or we die!"



Illusive Man: "I need you to believe."

Starchild: "Your belief is not required,"

[Bill Casey]

CosmicGnosis has a Low EMS Destroy vs. Control vs. Synthesis Poll

social.bioware.com/4107826/polls/41103/

Modifié par Bill Casey, 29 octobre 2012 - 05:48 .

[Hrothdane]

Bill Casey wrote...

Pick an ending...

Control --- Synthesis --- Destroy

Here's one of mine:

Control -- Synthesis -- Destroy

[AresKeith]

Those who seeks or wants to control ends up being controlled themselves

[Raistlin Majare 1992]

BatmanTurian wrote...

"It also does not hurt that every single thing the IT has thrown out so far can be logically debunked through speculation You know like what the IT folks cling to.

I personally have yet to find a bit of evidence that was immune to being debunked so i cannot for the life of me understand why people cling to that delusion it's sad and embrassing. "

I love this Master Warder Z guy. I want to know what evidence he's found that isn't compelling and can be debunked. More like " I don't want to think about things and just shoot stuff. Stop making my head work hard."

Whenever I see someone doing that one, I ask them to elaborate, so bring up some of all this "logical speculation."

Half the time I dont get an answer or the answer is bad writing / Vendetta can detect Indoctrination or something just as ludicrous.

I truly believe that over half of the litteralists out there never bothered to look up half of the things we compiled and instead just use outdated arguments which dosent even cover 5% of the evidence IT consists of.

[Rifneno]

"I will destroy you!"

You know, Jack would make an acceptable fill-in for Shepard. Certainly better than litalists.

[Rifneno]

Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...

BatmanTurian wrote...

"It also does not hurt that every single thing the IT has thrown out so far can be logically debunked through speculation You know like what the IT folks cling to.

I personally have yet to find a bit of evidence that was immune to being debunked so i cannot for the life of me understand why people cling to that delusion it's sad and embrassing. "

I love this Master Warder Z guy. I want to know what evidence he's found that isn't compelling and can be debunked. More like " I don't want to think about things and just shoot stuff. Stop making my head work hard."

Whenever I see someone doing that one, I ask them to elaborate, so bring up some of all this "logical speculation."

Half the time I dont get an answer or the answer is bad writing / Vendetta can detect Indoctrination or something just as ludicrous.

I truly believe that over half of the litteralists out there never bothered to look up half of the things we compiled and instead just use outdated arguments which dosent even cover 5% of the evidence IT consists of.

Of course not.  If they used logic and reasoning, they wouldn't be literalists anymore.

[Hrothdane]

Rifneno wrote...

"I will destroy you!"

You know, Jack would make an acceptable fill-in for Shepard. Certainly better than litalists.

Not Rodriguez, though. She couldn't destroy wet tissue paper.

[Rifneno]

Hrothdane wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

"I will destroy you!"

You know, Jack would make an acceptable fill-in for Shepard. Certainly better than litalists.

Not Rodriguez, though. She couldn't destroy wet tissue paper.

Maybe if she drinks her juice?