Rifneno wrote...
Hrothdane wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
"I will destroy you!"
You know, Jack would make an acceptable fill-in for Shepard. Certainly better than litalists.
Not Rodriguez, though. She couldn't destroy wet tissue paper.
Maybe if she drinks her juice?
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Well...
Created on 2012-10-28 58 votes, 31 comments, 318 views later
Was curious where people stood on the Indoctrination Theory after nearly 6000 pages of postings
Yes! OMG IT needs to stop! Why do you keep believing this?
43%(25 votes)
No, IT is fact that is valid and can be found everywhere in the ME Universe
57%(33 votes)
and IT is still leading but it's a close race...*screech*...what wait? A close race? OMG! So many indoctrinated people!
I wonder if BioWare will use this all against us. i.e. ME4's multiplayer could be indoctrinated vs non-indoctrinated based on your ending choices (i.e. we think we're playing against AIs but we're really playing PvP.
Would be fun to structure the next game based on an indoctrinated vs non-indoctrinated choice
Guest_SwobyJ_*
CmdrShep80 wrote...
Well...
Created on 2012-10-28 58 votes, 31 comments, 318 views later
Was curious where people stood on the Indoctrination Theory after nearly 6000 pages of postings
Yes! OMG IT needs to stop! Why do you keep believing this?
43%(25 votes)
No, IT is fact that is valid and can be found everywhere in the ME Universe
57%(33 votes)
and IT is still leading but it's a close race...*screech*...what wait? A close race? OMG! So many indoctrinated people!
I wonder if BioWare will use this all against us. i.e. ME4's multiplayer could be indoctrinated vs non-indoctrinated based on your ending choices (i.e. we think we're playing against AIs but we're really playing PvP.
Would be fun to structure the next game based on an indoctrinated vs non-indoctrinated choice
And to think I almost forgot why I don't like many IT-Supporters. I come on this thing by chance and find this.spotlessvoid wrote...
I've seen brutes think things through more thoroughly than synthesis supporters. I think it's possible. I don't think it would be that hard to trick them into being the bad guys.
"rawr. They won't synthesize! Use your new synthesis powers and assume banshee form, go forth and indoc-ahem convert the heathens!"
They'd buy it. They could call it team Harbinger and they'd buy it.
Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:14 .
Fine, here's a logical question for you: Why would Bioware spend months creating the Extended Cut, which they could of spent making DLC they can charge for, in order to give us free content that adds epilogues to the endings if they're only "illusions" and not add your so-called "real" ending?spotlessvoid wrote...
Logic card trumps victim card. Proceeds.
So in Overlord supposedly this poor guy David synthesizes with a VI and goes basically insane.
Synthesizing with an exponentially more complex intelligence in the Reapers however is proven safe .
Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 29 octobre 2012 - 07:57 .
You still haven't answered my question. Also, I was happy with the original endings.spotlessvoid wrote...
A few still pictures and a few minutes of monologue to quiet you down. Look how happy with the ending you are now. Got your shiny new Reaper code and your as pleased as can be. The MP trailers took more effort than that.
And what do you consider "several plausible explanations"?spotlessvoid wrote...
There are several plausible explanations for the ending. None of them include synthesis being legitimate.
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fine, here's a logical question for you: Why would Bioware spend months creating the Extended Cut, which they could of spent making DLC they can charge for, in order to give us free content that adds epilogues to the endings if they're only "illusions" and not add your so-called "real" ending?spotlessvoid wrote...
Logic card trumps victim card. Proceeds.
So in Overlord supposedly this poor guy David synthesizes with a VI and goes basically insane.
Synthesizing with an exponentially more complex intelligence in the Reapers however is proven safe .
Modifié par BleedingUranium, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:07 .
You forgot it also addresses what happens after the event, like the fate of the various species.BleedingUranium wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fine, here's a logical question for you: Why would Bioware spend months creating the Extended Cut, which they could of spent making DLC they can charge for, in order to give us free content that adds epilogues to the endings if they're only "illusions" and not add your so-called "real" ending?spotlessvoid wrote...
Logic card trumps victim card. Proceeds.
So in Overlord supposedly this poor guy David synthesizes with a VI and goes basically insane.
Synthesizing with an exponentially more complex intelligence in the Reapers however is proven safe .
Because the only things EC addressed were:
-Wouldn't the relays blowing up kill everyone?
-How did your crew get on the Normandy?
-Why did the Normandy run away?
Nothing about the actual ending "issues" were truely changed. Bioware clarified the things that were totally unexpected to them.
That wasn't the question. I asked why would they take time out of their schedule to work on "illusions" and not your "real" ending.spotlessvoid wrote...
Yes I did. My answer was the EC didn't take months of hard work. It's a slide show of low quality pictures with a tiny bit of voice acting. What a joke.
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
You forgot it also addresses what happens after the event, like the fate of the various species.BleedingUranium wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fine, here's a logical question for you: Why would Bioware spend months creating the Extended Cut, which they could of spent making DLC they can charge for, in order to give us free content that adds epilogues to the endings if they're only "illusions" and not add your so-called "real" ending?spotlessvoid wrote...
Logic card trumps victim card. Proceeds.
So in Overlord supposedly this poor guy David synthesizes with a VI and goes basically insane.
Synthesizing with an exponentially more complex intelligence in the Reapers however is proven safe .
Because the only things EC addressed were:
-Wouldn't the relays blowing up kill everyone?
-How did your crew get on the Normandy?
-Why did the Normandy run away?
Nothing about the actual ending "issues" were truely changed. Bioware clarified the things that were totally unexpected to them.
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That wasn't the question. I asked why would they take time out of their schedule to work on "illusions" and not your "real" ending.spotlessvoid wrote...
Yes I did. My answer was the EC didn't take months of hard work. It's a slide show of low quality pictures with a tiny bit of voice acting. What a joke.
Oh, ok. I was considering the Relay situation a seperate issue from what happens to the races after the Reaper War.BleedingUranium wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
You forgot it also addresses what happens after the event, like the fate of the various species.BleedingUranium wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
Fine, here's a logical question for you: Why would Bioware spend months creating the Extended Cut, which they could of spent making DLC they can charge for, in order to give us free content that adds epilogues to the endings if they're only "illusions" and not add your so-called "real" ending?spotlessvoid wrote...
Logic card trumps victim card. Proceeds.
So in Overlord supposedly this poor guy David synthesizes with a VI and goes basically insane.
Synthesizing with an exponentially more complex intelligence in the Reapers however is proven safe .
Because the only things EC addressed were:
-Wouldn't the relays blowing up kill everyone?
-How did your crew get on the Normandy?
-Why did the Normandy run away?
Nothing about the actual ending "issues" were truely changed. Bioware clarified the things that were totally unexpected to them.
Right, yes, that too. That's (kind of) part of the relays exploding point.
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That wasn't the question. I asked why would they take time out of their schedule to work on "illusions" and not your "real" ending.spotlessvoid wrote...
Yes I did. My answer was the EC didn't take months of hard work. It's a slide show of low quality pictures with a tiny bit of voice acting. What a joke.
I think they would've capitalized on the Indoctrination Hypothesis when it had the highest following rather than release something that took away a lot of it's support if they planned to use it at all. It's only logical.spotlessvoid wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That wasn't the question. I asked why would they take time out of their schedule to work on "illusions" and not your "real" ending.spotlessvoid wrote...
Yes I did. My answer was the EC didn't take months of hard work. It's a slide show of low quality pictures with a tiny bit of voice acting. What a joke.
Who says they aren't? A REAL DLC takes time. It also makes no sense to release that first. EC was slapped together to quell fan outrage enough to proceed with the dlc schedule. It worked
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
I think they would've capitalized on the Indoctrination Hypothesis when it had the highest following rather than release something that took away a lot of it's support if they planned to use it at all. It's only logical.spotlessvoid wrote...
LDS Darth Revan wrote...
That wasn't the question. I asked why would they take time out of their schedule to work on "illusions" and not your "real" ending.spotlessvoid wrote...
Yes I did. My answer was the EC didn't take months of hard work. It's a slide show of low quality pictures with a tiny bit of voice acting. What a joke.
Who says they aren't? A REAL DLC takes time. It also makes no sense to release that first. EC was slapped together to quell fan outrage enough to proceed with the dlc schedule. It worked
Modifié par spotlessvoid, 29 octobre 2012 - 08:22 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut