Modifié par masster blaster, 30 octobre 2012 - 01:30 .
PC was bricked. Now it is unbricked.masster blaster wrote...
Simon I haven't seen you in a long time. How have you been?
Modifié par Simon_Says, 30 octobre 2012 - 02:33 .
Simon_Says wrote...
PC was bricked. Now it is unbricked.masster blaster wrote...
Simon I haven't seen you in a long time. How have you been?
In the mean time I had finally learned how to love my fellow human beings unconditionally. Now I choose not to.
Simon_Says wrote...
PC was bricked. Now it is unbricked.masster blaster wrote...
Simon I haven't seen you in a long time. How have you been?
In the mean time I had finally learned how to love my fellow human beings unconditionally. Now I choose not to.
Simon_Says wrote...
Except that quantum entanglement can't be used as a form of communication. There's even debate over what it is. The only thing about it is that when two systems become entangled their states are directly related when observed. Were their states set when they became entangled? Do they collapse into their states upon observation? How fast is this link if it exists? More importantly, from what frame(s) of reference are they operating in*?spotlessvoid wrote...
QEC isn't exactly space magic technology guys. They already did experiments using QE starting in the late 90s. Price and need have kept this in fledgling stage, but it's not anything new conceptually.
Either way, you can't use QEC to communicate, since no classical information is transmitted. You can use it to secure a subluminal communication, however. And theoretically you can maybe use it for other useful purposes, but phoning home from Tau Ceti aint one of them. Then again, in ME ships can explicitly move faster than light even in their local frame and the violation of conservation of energy forms the bedrock of galactic technology, so yeah.
*This in particular bugs me. The common interpretation is that entangled pairs affect each other 'instantaneously'. Except we know very well that simultaneity is completely dependent on one's frame of reference, if there is no direct causal relationship. I won't get into this because this is exactly why FTL of any form is problematic (yes, even for wormholes and other similar shenanigans).
Bits of information?BatmanTurian wrote...
It's theoretically possible to send quantum bits into the future or into the past.
Modifié par Bill Casey, 30 octobre 2012 - 01:36 .
Bill Casey wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
It's theoretically possible to send quantum bits into the future or into the past.
Like... a sports almanac?
Quantum information. Not classical information, like the suggested almanac.Bill Casey wrote...
Bits of information?BatmanTurian wrote...
It's theoretically possible to send quantum bits into the future or into the past.
Like... a sports almanac?
Biff will be disappointedSimon_Says wrote...
Quantum information. Not classical information, like the suggested almanac.
Long story short, it's a bit trickier to read.
Simon_Says wrote...
Quantum information. Not classical information, like the suggested almanac.Bill Casey wrote...
Bits of information?BatmanTurian wrote...
It's theoretically possible to send quantum bits into the future or into the past.
Like... a sports almanac?
Long story short, it's a bit trickier to read.
Yep. Apparently, the first 2.99 games were teaching us lessons that were completey wrong. After 100 hours of classes, we get a 10-minute pop quiz where you must do the exact opposite of what you learned in order to get the best result.spotlessvoid wrote...
Ahhh, literalist....
The Reapers are innocent
Starchild is innocent
It's all Shepard's ****ing fault, clearly
Modifié par clennon8, 30 octobre 2012 - 01:46 .
Modifié par masster blaster, 30 octobre 2012 - 01:58 .
Well said.clennon8 wrote...
Yep. Apparently, the first 2.99 games were teaching us lessons that were completey wrong. After 100 hours of classes, we get a 10-minute pop quiz where you must do the exact opposite of what you learned in order to get the best result.spotlessvoid wrote...
Ahhh, literalist....
The Reapers are innocent
Starchild is innocent
It's all Shepard's ****ing fault, clearly
Literalists are so silly.
BansheeOwnage wrote...
Well said.clennon8 wrote...
Yep. Apparently, the first 2.99 games were teaching us lessons that were completey wrong. After 100 hours of classes, we get a 10-minute pop quiz where you must do the exact opposite of what you learned in order to get the best result.spotlessvoid wrote...
Ahhh, literalist....
The Reapers are innocent
Starchild is innocent
It's all Shepard's ****ing fault, clearly
Literalists are so silly.
Modifié par masster blaster, 30 octobre 2012 - 02:00 .
masster blaster wrote...
Project X Dwailing Project x, and there is this....
AC3 ending sucks. People are calling it the new ME3 ending.
Also 1 more minute till Red Vs Blue.
masster blaster wrote...
Project X Dwailing Project x, and there is this....
AC3 ending sucks. People are calling it the new ME3 ending.
Also 1 more minute till Red Vs Blue.
AresKeith wrote...
masster blaster wrote...
Project X Dwailing Project x, and there is this....
AC3 ending sucks. People are calling it the new ME3 ending.
Also 1 more minute till Red Vs Blue.
The AC3 ending isn't that bad, it is stupid thought
On the bright side, Iron Man 3 looks like its gonna be a good movie
Well, there was that whole bit about challenging assumptions. The geth aren't evil, the asari aren't faultless, drinking rincol is a bad idea, etc. Except that kind of pales in comparison to chronic terrorism, mindrape, planet razing, genocide agendas, etc. over millions of years without remorse or consideration of alternative ideas like "don't be douchebags".BansheeOwnage wrote...
Well said.clennon8 wrote...
Yep. Apparently, the first 2.99 games were teaching us lessons that were completey wrong. After 100 hours of classes, we get a 10-minute pop quiz where you must do the exact opposite of what you learned in order to get the best result.spotlessvoid wrote...
Ahhh, literalist....
The Reapers are innocent
Starchild is innocent
It's all Shepard's ****ing fault, clearly
Literalists are so silly.
Snape killed his sled.Big_Boss9 wrote...
Could we please stop bringing up AC3? I would rather not be spoiled. Respectfully, take it elsewhere.
Damn you Simon!Simon_Says wrote...
Snape killed his sled.Big_Boss9 wrote...
Could we please stop bringing up AC3? I would rather not be spoiled. Respectfully, take it elsewhere.
Modifié par Big_Boss9, 30 octobre 2012 - 02:08 .
BatmanTurian wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
masster blaster wrote...
Project X Dwailing Project x, and there is this....
AC3 ending sucks. People are calling it the new ME3 ending.
Also 1 more minute till Red Vs Blue.
The AC3 ending isn't that bad, it is stupid thought
On the bright side, Iron Man 3 looks like its gonna be a good movie
It's not stupid, it's what they've been alluding to since the beginning of the series.
Modifié par BansheeOwnage, 30 octobre 2012 - 02:10 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
