Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#42601
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Restrider wrote...

I can understand it, when people complain about random walls of quotes that seem unrelated. But since a lot of people claim that IT is fanfic and not based on ingame events and that it isn't foreshadowed, I cannot understand how a well categorized archive of ingamge quotes can harm this thread?
Since DD even outsourced his archive into a thread in the IT group, you cannot say that he is spamming this thread with rather unrelated quotes.
Furthermore he has more than once explained that he is not going to list each quote with "This proves IT!", but he is going to thoroughly examine the quotes and catalog them (and I would say you should also include Synthesis and Control supporting quotes, if they exist).

Long story short: I don't really get the negativity DD is getting for his undertaking. Especially when it seems that his biggest critics didn't even fully understand what he wants to do (as stated above, not "THIS PROVES IT!" archive).


Agreed. Nothing more I can add to this.

#42602
Home run MF

Home run MF
  • Members
  • 805 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...
They're evil and the Intellignce/'Catalyst' is Harbinger or at least an evil Reaper presence. I'm ...99%(?) sure of this by now.


Been sure about that since the EC. The sad, twisted, perverted and yet brilliant part, that comes by concept of the Reapers and the choice chamber, it simply doesn't matter at the end of ME3 what you think of the Guardian...but only by design. It is a forced choice that isn't really one. It's a lab experiment.


Leviathan: The galaxy itself became an experiment. Evolution its tool.


#42603
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Home run MF wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...
They're evil and the Intellignce/'Catalyst' is Harbinger or at least an evil Reaper presence. I'm ...99%(?) sure of this by now.


Been sure about that since the EC. The sad, twisted, perverted and yet brilliant part, that comes by concept of the Reapers and the choice chamber, it simply doesn't matter at the end of ME3 what you think of the Guardian...but only by design. It is a forced choice that isn't really one. It's a lab experiment.


Leviathan: The galaxy itself became an experiment. Evolution its tool.


Harbinger: Your worlds will become our laboratories

#42604
smokingotter1

smokingotter1
  • Members
  • 735 messages

AresKeith wrote...

Home run MF wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...
They're evil and the Intellignce/'Catalyst' is Harbinger or at least an evil Reaper presence. I'm ...99%(?) sure of this by now.


Been sure about that since the EC. The sad, twisted, perverted and yet brilliant part, that comes by concept of the Reapers and the choice chamber, it simply doesn't matter at the end of ME3 what you think of the Guardian...but only by design. It is a forced choice that isn't really one. It's a lab experiment.


Leviathan: The galaxy itself became an experiment. Evolution its tool.


Harbinger: Your worlds will become our laboratories


Not if we cut their grant funding first.

#42605
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

smokingotter1 wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Harbinger: Your worlds will become our laboratories


Not if we cut their grant funding first.


That'll only make them produce results faster. :P

#42606
Guest_magnetite_*

Guest_magnetite_*
  • Guests
I'm talking to everyone after each mission and new dialog sequences are opening up if I did this during my current playthrough. Never happened before, because I never checked in with everyone after each mission. Maybe once in a while. The Reapers are brokering some kind of peace agreement so people can board a Reaper and get indoctrinated. It's a trap.

Modifié par magnetite, 02 novembre 2012 - 07:48 .


#42607
Hrothdane

Hrothdane
  • Members
  • 1 208 messages
If I have learned anything from sci-fi, I have learned that cutting the funding on research projects will inevitably lead to terrible scientific misconduct that produces monsters/diseases that will wipe out the world/superweapons/another Housewives series on Bravo.

#42608
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages
Mass Effect Trilogy trailer is out. Mostly a mash-up of in-game content.


Also, check out the final episode of Halo 4: FUD.

Modifié par paxxton, 02 novembre 2012 - 07:52 .


#42609
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

MegumiAzusa wrote...

leonia42 wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

demersel wrote...
And of course there is a thing that garrus represents paragon, and wrex represents renegade.

I don't see how.  Garrus is an awesome guy, don't get me wrong, but he's pretty much the perfect example of how you can be renegade and still be a good guy.  He quit C-sec because he hates going by the book, he set up shop in Omega and started murdering the **** out of evil scumbags of his own accord.  Paragon always tries for the peaceful solution and is generally Lawful-Stupid.  Lawful-Stupid Shepard can even admonish Garrus for being a vigilante.
And Wrex... he's not the traditional paragon, but what he's doing with the krogan is as close as you can get to paragon with the krogan.

My thoughts exactly. But to be fair, blue has always been more of Garrus' colour and red is more Wrex. Maybe it has nothing to do with symoblism at all. 
It's a great piece of art though it's odd that the Reapers aren't heavily portrayed. Cool to see Saren in some new artwork though. Overall it reminds me of the traditional Star Wars movie posters, which didn't have too much overt symbolism going on either.

So that would make Samara 100% renegade?

I think Samara is 100% renegade and it is only her culture's more aesthetic approach along with her love for her daughters that allow you to barely convince her away from pure Renegade.
A paragon has to continually intervene in order to get her to leave the narrative with her one daughter and her own life intact. That's how strong her Renegade is.

Apolgies for the quote pyramid but it's all relevant here.

It would be interesting to see the relative Paragon and Renegade scores for each character, like we could see LS/DS for our companions in the KotOR games.

The difference between Garrus and Wrex for me is about choice.  Wrex seems like a pantomime Renegade, but he's been corridored down this route.  As a Krogan, he really doesn't have a choice in being hard as nails.  A weak Krogan has no place in the world.  For a Krogan I think he's pretty Paragon, speaking relatively.  He has had to deal with tough realities, including the Genophage, and his own biotic abilities (which mark him out as distrustful don't they?  I thought he said something like that in ME1).

Wrex was my favourite character in ME1.  I always felt like he begrudgingly gave Shepard a lot of respect, even in the way he said "Shepard" when you ended Normandy conversations.  It seemed like Shepard and Wrex were teaching each other that there is a lot more to people thatn the surface impressions.  (Remember that in ME1, racial tension and distrust of other races was a big issue.  Shepard and Wrex showed each other that even with totally different backgrounds, they could share the same strengths and values).

Garrus used to annoy in ME1 cos he seemed very Paragon.  He was always trying to do the right thing, and because C-Sec red tape wouldn't allow it, he seemed pretty whiny.  This changed in ME2 with him becoming Archangel.  He made the choice to accept more responsibility for his actions and be willing enough to make Renegade choices when necessary.  His personality seemed to have changed significantly, because of what happened to his squad.

So both of these would have strong elements of both Paragon and Renegade.  

I find Samara much harder to guage.  She is almost neutral - no passionate choices either side.  She sticks to her Justicar code irrepective of her own opinions on any matter.  This often makes her cold and ruthless in her actions, but I don't think that relates to being Renegade.  Really, her only Para/Rene scores would occur when she makes a choice outside of that code.  For example, when she decides to shoot herself rather than murder her daughter.  That is a classic Paragon choice I feel.

About the artwork, I think there are reasons we could find to decide why each character is on the red or blue side, but I don't think it's as simple as representing Paragon and Renegade personalities.

#42610
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

paxxton wrote...

Mass Effect Trilogy trailer is out. Mostly a mash-up of in-game content.


Also, check out the final episode of Halo 4: FUD.


I think that's a fan made trailer. It's very good though.

The official one's here - http://masseffect.bi.../about/trilogy/

#42611
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

Davik Kang wrote...

I find Samara much harder to guage.  She is almost neutral - no passionate choices either side.  She sticks to her Justicar code irrepective of her own opinions on any matter.  This often makes her cold and ruthless in her actions, but I don't think that relates to being Renegade.  Really, her only Para/Rene scores would occur when she makes a choice outside of that code.  For example, when she decides to shoot herself rather than murder her daughter.  That is a classic Paragon choice I feel.


Interesting insights. In a way, the Justicar code makes things easy for Samara, she doesn't have to agonise over the right decision, she just does what her code tells her to do. She can abrogate responsibility for her own choices.

#42612
CmdrShep80

CmdrShep80
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages

Eryri wrote...

 @ Doomsdaydevice - I'm sorry if my post suggesting adding control and synthesis quotes to your comparison came off as a criticism. I realise it's a huge amount of work going through 80+ hours of game content and I applaud your efforts. 

On another topic, I notice from the Bioware Blog that the PS3 version of the trilogy pack will have ME3 "exactly as it originally shipped".

Presumably this means no Extended Cut. Odd considering the amount of spare space on a Blu-Ray disk, you'd think they'd throw it in as it's a free download. Do you think this suggests that Bioware consider the original version to be the canon one? 

If there is a hypothetical IT dlc where Shep wakes up in london, that would render the ridiculous Normandy evac scene and the slideshows superfluous. Also the new conversation with the Bratalyst is included in Leviathan, just in case you don't have the EC.

Perhaps the EC really was just to buy time and will be unecessary when the dlc cycle is complete?


and probably without ashes. Keep in mind only the CE version had ashes from the get go free. Plus it gives people the opportunity to decide if they want the EC or not

#42613
CmdrShep80

CmdrShep80
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages

magnetite wrote...

I'm talking to everyone after each mission and new dialog sequences are opening up if I did this during my current playthrough. Never happened before, because I never checked in with everyone after each mission. Maybe once in a while. The Reapers are brokering some kind of peace agreement so people can board a Reaper and get indoctrinated. It's a trap.


happened to me but then I'm a completionist. I will talk to everyone till dialog repeats again. This is the same for NPCs. It's how people can easily miss some of the great conversations in Huerta Memorial among other places

#42614
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Eryri wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Mass Effect Trilogy trailer is out. Mostly a mash-up of in-game content.


Also, check out the final episode of Halo 4: FUD.


I think that's a fan made trailer. It's very good though.

The official one's here - http://masseffect.bi.../about/trilogy/

Yup, my mistake. Anyway, I guess since everyone on the planet has already completed all the games, there's no worries about the official trailer containing a massive amount of spoilers, including ME1 ending.

#42615
CmdrShep80

CmdrShep80
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages

Hrothdane wrote...

If I have learned anything from sci-fi, I have learned that cutting the funding on research projects will inevitably lead to terrible scientific misconduct that produces monsters/diseases that will wipe out the world/superweapons/another Housewives series on Bravo.


that and giving people with glowing eyes the keys to do whatever they want will achieve the same results

#42616
CmdrShep80

CmdrShep80
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages
@swoobyJ-one thing to consider. What if people are doing what I'm doing and waiting until BioWare releases their next dlc? I still haven't beat the game the 2nd time because I'm waiting to play the dlc's as they come out. I played leviathan and ashes but waiting for omega now and soon hopefully the citadel

#42617
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages
" She can abrogate responsibility for her own choices."

She can pretend to. She made the choice of becoming.and remaining a justicar. That is a moral decision itself. She claims the code covers all possible scenarios, but since I don't believe in absolutes or objective reality, I find her code inherently flawed, lacking compassion, and even hypocritical. Not saying she wasn't an interesting character, just that I find her Justicar code to be straight bs

#42618
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

CmdrShep80 wrote...

snip Plus it gives people the opportunity to decide if they want the EC or not


It's still a bit odd though, as the WiiU version is supposed to include the EC. If the literal endings are true (shudder:unsure:), then the EC is an improvement on the horrendous original version - although that's like saying a bad head cold is an improvement on tuberculosis.

I can't see anyone preferring the original cut if what we see on screen is supposed to be what actually transpires. Possibly Control supporters who want to headcanon flying all the reapers into the Sun perhaps. Then they get all the benefits of Destroy without betraying the Geth and Edi. 

Modifié par Eryri, 02 novembre 2012 - 08:57 .


#42619
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

" She can abrogate responsibility for her own choices."

She can pretend to. She made the choice of becoming.and remaining a justicar. That is a moral decision itself. She claims the code covers all possible scenarios, but since I don't believe in absolutes or objective reality, I find her code inherently flawed, lacking compassion, and even hypocritical. Not saying she wasn't an interesting character, just that I find her Justicar code to be straight bs


I agree. Samara was quite damaged and vulnerable in a way, despite her power. Embracing the Justicar code was a coping mechanism to give her life certainty and purpose, to deal with her grief and guilt over her daughters.

#42620
Hrothdane

Hrothdane
  • Members
  • 1 208 messages

spotlessvoid wrote...

" She can abrogate responsibility for her own choices."

She can pretend to. She made the choice of becoming.and remaining a justicar. That is a moral decision itself. She claims the code covers all possible scenarios, but since I don't believe in absolutes or objective reality, I find her code inherently flawed, lacking compassion, and even hypocritical. Not saying she wasn't an interesting character, just that I find her Justicar code to be straight bs


Responsibility is difficult, and people will do whatever they can to trick themselves out of their own freedom just to avoid it.

"Those who lack courage will always find a philosophy to justify it." -Albert Camus

Therein is what makes Samara interesting to me. Ultimately, she became a justicar out of cowardice. In her recruitment mission, she shows she knows how to manipulate the code when it is in her favor, but she uses it as a defense mechanism when Shepard tries to romance her. She's such a sad and lonely character, but she is very human, and I must love someone for their humanity.

#42621
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages
Yes to both of you. Well said

#42622
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages
That's one hell of an alternate ending. Posted Image

Modifié par paxxton, 02 novembre 2012 - 08:46 .


#42623
Humakt83

Humakt83
  • Members
  • 1 893 messages

Hrothdane wrote...

Responsibility is difficult, and people will do whatever they can to trick themselves out of their own freedom just to avoid it.

"Those who lack courage will always find a philosophy to justify it." -Albert Camus

Therein is what makes Samara interesting to me. Ultimately, she became a justicar out of cowardice. In her recruitment mission, she shows she knows how to manipulate the code when it is in her favor, but she uses it as a defense mechanism when Shepard tries to romance her. She's such a sad and lonely character, but she is very human, and I must love someone for their humanity.


Uhmm, she says that code does not forbid romancing.

#42624
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

So... I totally just spent half an hour in my Writing prof's office explaining the ending to Mass Effect 3. It was funny to see how easy she caught on (but not surprising, as she is an agnostic athiest and the theme of 'indoctrination' is one she really understands).

Mhm... I usually have to explain to my prof weird experimental results. And this usually results in more experiments and new papers to write... it's a vicious circle.

#42625
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 12 076 messages
Maybe Samara doesn't want a romance because, ya'know, all her previous children turned out to be space vampires.