estebanus wrote...
Hahaha, real f*cking funny.BansheeOwnage wrote...
What? It can do 2 things at once! What the hell Estebanus?estebanus wrote...
Exactly. Meaning that it supports the choice in itself, not a theory revolving about the choice.BatmanTurian wrote...
No, it was valid for me before I even discovered IT. It's what Shepard is meant to do, it's what all of his allies want him to do, it's what trillions of lives murdered and harvested demand as justice and karma for taking their lives. The other two choices are the goals of madmen who were clearly pawns of the enemy and therefore goals of the enemy.Drink some coffee, or go to bed. You seem tired or something.
If there has to be something that supports the IT, then it has to be something that makes it more clear that it was an hallucination, not that one choice is preferred over another one. Shepard telling Harbinger that they'll fight the reapers to the end does NOT in any way, shape or form make it more clear that the ending scene was an hallucination.
wtf..
Support =/= proof.
Supporting information does not have to be evidence, or proof for IT.
It's just supporting information. It supports IT, but just not in a very major way (as real evidence or proof would).
That's it. It's not complicated, really.




Ce sujet est fermé
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Retour en haut




