Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!
#43101
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:28
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
#43102
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:29
As far as I know, it shows up, when you have no LI.starlitegirlx wrote...
ZerebusPrime wrote...
The missing link: why a child?
I was thinking about cut version of David Anderson's "you did good" talk. In this conversation, Anderson asks Shepard if he ever thought about starting a family and tells him that not having a family was one of his greatest regrets in life. Here in the IT thread, though, we see Anderson in this sequence not as himself but rather as Shepard's unspoiled "good" side, in which case this conversation should have raised all sorts of red flags. If Shepard's conscience regrets not having a family, then it means that deep down Shepard regrets not having a family. And therein was the kink in his mental armor that the Reapers first seeped through, creating the apparition of the child playing outside Shepard's window. The Reapers then sought to widen the gap by showing the kid get vaporized, and then again and again with successive dreams. Finally, they manage to crack Shepard after his failure on Thessia. After that, we start seeing progressively weirder things in Shepard's waking hours, starting from the Cerberus HQ mission and culminating in the Decision Chamber.
Or, from a more literal point of view, it could have simply implied that Anderson had been seeing visions of children, too, which would point towards his own indoctrination.
Where is this converation about having a family? I've never come across that in game.
#43103
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:29
Guest_SwobyJ_*
BatmanTurian wrote...
SwobyJ wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
SwobyJ wrote...
Personal Log: Damini Sengupta
Attempts are ongoing at figuring out what the end product of our research was meant for. While it is obvious that the delivery system was to be implant-reliant, with evident neurological applications, many questions remain as of yet unanswered. The loss of Dr. Horace Armstrong in particular is hindering our efforts to speedily reconstruct the nature of the Illusive Man's goals. We have several parts of the whole, which lead us to chilling conclusions. But we are nowhere near figuring out what said whole might be - and that is what scares me the most.
Davik in particular should read this.
My money is on a new human reaper that TIM wants to control being built at Omega.
Nice catch, but I'm talking more about symbolism by the writers.
Davik was writing earlier that the truth of the ending might just be that:
-Shepard is dying in rubble
-The Crucible was never used (or was it? dunno)
-Illusive Man is still alive (this part is more my thoughts)
-the galaxy's forced are all gathered together on ONE spot, in a trap
It's a very dire ending, but it would be covered up by the endings Bioware gave us, especially with Extended Cut (extended DREAM).
The 'several parts of the whole' are our puzzle pieces, the biggest ones being the current and upcoming ME3 DLC.
"But we are nowhere near figuring out what said whole might be - and that is what scares me the most."
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I feel its a general mixture of:
-IT
-Puzzle
-Deception
-Waking Nightmare
With some incorrect details in each of them. The Hackett theory I've talked about before is.. well, I don't think hes actually indoctrinated, but I do think that the Alliance is NOT as pure as we are lead to believe in ME3. It's just part of the narrative that we get to see them in a better light... for now.
#43104
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:31
Restrider wrote...
As far as I know, it shows up, when you have no LI.starlitegirlx wrote...
Where is this converation about having a family? I've never come across that in game.
Incorrect. It was cut. It doesnt appear in the actual game at all.
#43105
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:31
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
It is quite puzzling.
#43106
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:32
Guest_SwobyJ_*
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
I think Bioware writes it where:
-Shepard consciously wants Destroy
-*Always wonders* about Control (but doesn't let himself believe it can/will happen, most of the time)
-Wishes for Synthesis, at least in many playthrough
When you read between the lines. That's why the Catalyst choices are both so jarring, yet not totally unexpected. We DO realize that Shepard does sometimes ask about how controlling the Reapers is possible, even as he consciously objects to and rejects the notion.
And his friendship and openness (in most playthroughs) to synthetics and AI is a sign that in some part of him, he wishes a form of synthesis (the kind in the Synthesis ending dream, ahem) would be possible.
#43107
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:32
SwobyJ wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I feel its a general mixture of:
-IT
-Puzzle
-Deception
-Waking Nightmare
With some incorrect details in each of them. The Hackett theory I've talked about before is.. well, I don't think hes actually indoctrinated, but I do think that the Alliance is NOT as pure as we are lead to believe in ME3. It's just part of the narrative that we get to see them in a better light... for now.
I'm not sure how we would combine them all, like some kind of voltron reject or a reaper.
Modifié par BatmanTurian, 03 novembre 2012 - 11:33 .
#43108
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:32
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
That only happens if your Shepard is Paragon.
If renegade he says this: Lies are easy to detect. But you seem to be telling the truth, Commander. For now.
#43109
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:33
I don't know, but I had that conversation during an EC run with a Shep without LI. I always thought this was alluding to Shepard having no LI.MegumiAzusa wrote...
I guess nothing but a rumor. Had no romance while using the non import Shep and it was just the standard conversation.FFZero wrote...
I'm not sure whether it was cut or if you have to meet certain parameters, I seem to remember reading somewhere that Shepard can’t have romanced anyone throughout the series to get it. All I know is I’ve never seen it in game, which is a good thing or I would’ve been crying even more at that point.
#43110
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:33
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Like he's always sure of defeating the Reapers, and projects his confidence on others, but its easy to believe he isn't QUITE as sure of himself as his words usually consist of.
#43111
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:34
Interesting theory. Gives ammunition to people like Ieldra, Seival, and HYR though.SwobyJ wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
I think Bioware writes it where:
-Shepard consciously wants Destroy
-*Always wonders* about Control (but doesn't let himself believe it can/will happen, most of the time)
-Wishes for Synthesis, at least in many playthrough
When you read between the lines. That's why the Catalyst choices are both so jarring, yet not totally unexpected. We DO realize that Shepard does sometimes ask about how controlling the Reapers is possible, even as he consciously objects to and rejects the notion.
And his friendship and openness (in most playthroughs) to synthetics and AI is a sign that in some part of him, he wishes a form of synthesis (the kind in the Synthesis ending dream, ahem) would be possible.
#43112
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:34
Home run MF wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
That only happens if your Shepard is Paragon.
If renegade he says this: Lies are easy to detect. But you seem to be telling the truth, Commander. For now.
I know its paragon only, but even paragons want to destroy the Reapers. Doesnt make sense for it to be a Paragon only thing.
#43113
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:34
BatmanTurian wrote...
They're starting to reach the limit of console and pc tech, so things are starting to fall into uncanny valley territory.
Console tech? Ages ago. PC tech? No.
#43114
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:35
Guest_SwobyJ_*
BatmanTurian wrote...
SwobyJ wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I feel its a general mixture of:
-IT
-Puzzle
-Deception
-Waking Nightmare
With some incorrect details in each of them. The Hackett theory I've talked about before is.. well, I don't think hes actually indoctrinated, but I do think that the Alliance is NOT as pure as we are lead to believe in ME3. It's just part of the narrative that we get to see them in a better light... for now.
I'm not sure how we would combine them all, like some kind of voltron reject or a reaper.
IT --> Indoctrination/enthrallment/etc is used.
Puzzle --> Bioware has even openly admitted to using the DLC as "puzzle pieces" to the story
Deception --> The Catalyst is lying
Waking Nightmare --> At least part of the ending is happening in a different form, in the 'real' world, and Shepard may be walking toward the big beam in the real London as well, if you pick Synthesis
#43115
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:35
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
Uh, because he's open to alternatives to destroy? I mean, the simple fact that it's possible for Shepard to choose something other than Destroy, IT or not, show's that his resolve is weakening.
#43116
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:37
I hope so. They're in no way incompatible, and the PT is pretty much confirmed to a point. IT is super-likely too.BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I'm just glad Halo 4 comes out in 2 days. It's always been my fallback game. That's where my name comes from, after all. I mean, I always end up going back to Halo after playing other games. It is very consistent. I know Halo 4 will have a good ending. And 2 of my favourite characters (Femshep, Harbinger) are in it!
#43117
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:40
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I hope so. They're in no way incompatible, and the PT is pretty much confirmed to a point. IT is super-likely too.BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I'm just glad Halo 4 comes out in 2 days. It's always been my fallback game. That's where my name comes from, after all. I mean, I always end up going back to Halo after playing other games. It is very consistent. I know Halo 4 will have a good ending. And 2 of my favourite characters (Femshep, Harbinger) are in it!
I like Halo, but I think the story got ridiculous when it turned out that 100,000 years ago, humans were just as advanced as the Forerunners and were allied with the Prophets.
#43118
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:40
Guest_SwobyJ_*
BatmanTurian wrote...
Interesting theory. Gives ammunition to people like Ieldra, Seival, and HYR though.SwobyJ wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
I think Bioware writes it where:
-Shepard consciously wants Destroy
-*Always wonders* about Control (but doesn't let himself believe it can/will happen, most of the time)
-Wishes for Synthesis, at least in many playthrough
When you read between the lines. That's why the Catalyst choices are both so jarring, yet not totally unexpected. We DO realize that Shepard does sometimes ask about how controlling the Reapers is possible, even as he consciously objects to and rejects the notion.
And his friendship and openness (in most playthroughs) to synthetics and AI is a sign that in some part of him, he wishes a form of synthesis (the kind in the Synthesis ending dream, ahem) would be possible.
So what?
Bioware is known to only rarely give true 'game over' endings to your choices in Mass Effect.
All the endings, on higher EMS, are ones of hope. It might be Shepard's downfall in some cases, but it does mean that he never loses hope, at all, compared to every other indoctrinated person we've met.
It's up to you whether to sympathize with Cerberus, or mostly reject them but use their resources. It's up to you whether to be attached to a character enough to romance them, or to ignore that entirely.
It's up to you how much you want to destroy the Reapers. The seeds of this story ARE there, even if the top layer of the narrative is the message of 'destroy the Reapers'.
I'm by no means advocating Control or Synthesis as the StarBrat presents them.
I'm only saying that Synthesis IS inevitable (and already happening in the ME universe)... but NOT by the Reapers' terms. (this might explain Jessica's comment too btw...) The Reapers create Husks, not individuals.
And Control IS technically possible, but the biggest risk any one could ever make. (aka it will lead to ruination, and no good results)
So Bioware is just laying out the choices and going: "Ok, so you think you understand our story? Here's your test (your crucible)."
"We wouldn't know how to write that story." <--- I get it now Bioware, finally.
#43119
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:41
Humakt83 wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
They're starting to reach the limit of console and pc tech, so things are starting to fall into uncanny valley territory.
Console tech? Ages ago. PC tech? No.
I'm talking about physicality. Quantum computing will be the next step, but soon they will reach the limit of physical hardware and microchips.
#43120
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:42
When is that conversation? I've only played From Ashes once.Home run MF wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
That only happens if your Shepard is Paragon.
If renegade he says this: Lies are easy to detect. But you seem to be telling the truth, Commander. For now.
"Wipe the reapers from existence"? I like it.
#43121
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:42
SwobyJ wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
SwobyJ wrote...
BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I feel its a general mixture of:
-IT
-Puzzle
-Deception
-Waking Nightmare
With some incorrect details in each of them. The Hackett theory I've talked about before is.. well, I don't think hes actually indoctrinated, but I do think that the Alliance is NOT as pure as we are lead to believe in ME3. It's just part of the narrative that we get to see them in a better light... for now.
I'm not sure how we would combine them all, like some kind of voltron reject or a reaper.
IT --> Indoctrination/enthrallment/etc is used.
Puzzle --> Bioware has even openly admitted to using the DLC as "puzzle pieces" to the story
Deception --> The Catalyst is lying
Waking Nightmare --> At least part of the ending is happening in a different form, in the 'real' world, and Shepard may be walking toward the big beam in the real London as well, if you pick Synthesis
Makes sense. What would we call this over-arching theory?
#43122
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:43
Guest_SwobyJ_*
Dwailing wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
Uh, because he's open to alternatives to destroy? I mean, the simple fact that it's possible for Shepard to choose something other than Destroy, IT or not, show's that his resolve is weakening.
Paragon Shepard is all about that.
It's what I said before about Paragon and Renegade.
Paragon = weakening resolve against Reapers, but strengthened community with the galaxy
(also is more likely to show clues that the story isn't quite 'right', in the dialogue)
Renegade = strengthened resolve against Reapers, but weakened sense of community with the galaxy
(and while is more likely to pick Destroy and 'eff the Reapers' in everything (yay!), will also have a more straightforward approach to the story and may lose IT clues in the dialogue)
#43123
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:44
byne wrote...
BansheeOwnage wrote...
I hope so. They're in no way incompatible, and the PT is pretty much confirmed to a point. IT is super-likely too.BatmanTurian wrote...
Jade's puzzle theory + IT may be how it's all actually going down.
I'm just glad Halo 4 comes out in 2 days. It's always been my fallback game. That's where my name comes from, after all. I mean, I always end up going back to Halo after playing other games. It is very consistent. I know Halo 4 will have a good ending. And 2 of my favourite characters (Femshep, Harbinger) are in it!
I like Halo, but I think the story got ridiculous when it turned out that 100,000 years ago, humans were just as advanced as the Forerunners and were allied with the Prophets.
As far as I understand it, Humans ARE the Forerunners.
#43124
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:44
BansheeOwnage wrote...
When is that conversation? I've only played From Ashes once.Home run MF wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
That only happens if your Shepard is Paragon.
If renegade he says this: Lies are easy to detect. But you seem to be telling the truth, Commander. For now.
"Wipe the reapers from existence"? I like it.
Its right after you pick Javik up, during the conversation with him and Liara. Its the second choice you have when talking to him. Pick the renegade option as a paragon.
#43125
Posté 03 novembre 2012 - 11:44
Foreshadowing the ending maybe? Victory at any cost always seemed more renegade during the games.byne wrote...
Home run MF wrote...
byne wrote...
Shepard: The goal of this ship is to wipe the Reapers from existence.
Javik: But how far are you willing to go to achieve that goal? I do not believe you commander. Lying is a biological marker. There is doubt behind your words.
This conversation always stands out to me. Why would there be doubt behind Shepard's words?
That only happens if your Shepard is Paragon.
If renegade he says this: Lies are easy to detect. But you seem to be telling the truth, Commander. For now.
I know its paragon only, but even paragons want to destroy the Reapers. Doesnt make sense for it to be a Paragon only thing.
Doomsday and I talked about this the other day. He said a paragon Shepard is more empathic and that could be a way in for indoctrination. He pointed out that during the Catalyst conversation the paragon options were more dubious.
Modifié par Home run MF, 03 novembre 2012 - 11:57 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





