Xilizhra wrote...
I set out to stop the Reapers. Via destruction or other means if possible.
See, now, there is your problem right there.
Xilizhra wrote...
I set out to stop the Reapers. Via destruction or other means if possible.
spotlessvoid wrote...
Great. This again. "My synthesis is special and it's not nice to say I'm wrong."
Yes, we know
smokingotter1 wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
demersel wrote...
And again there was this concept art of someone breaking into the shepard's cabin from the cieling window...
Went looking for it in case anyone needs a refresher. I couldn't find the original (then again, I am pretty lazy) but I found a copy someone used to make a motivational.
I wish this was put into ME3.
demersel wrote...
smokingotter1 wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
demersel wrote...
And again there was this concept art of someone breaking into the shepard's cabin from the cieling window...
Went looking for it in case anyone needs a refresher. I couldn't find the original (then again, I am pretty lazy) but I found a copy someone used to make a motivational.
snip*
I wish this was put into ME3.
Breaking into....or escaping!!
Modifié par smokingotter1, 06 novembre 2012 - 04:42 .
I missed you:wub:Xilizhra wrote...
You do realize you're still taking a path laid out for you in Destroy, yes?
Sounds like people are being indoctrinated by the citadel...CmdrShep80 wrote...
From the wiki. Took a few to find it again-
The keepers themselves reveal nothing of their nature and often undertake tasks that seem bizarre to other races, like rearranging offices or even changing architecture down on the Wards, with no explanation. In fact, all attempts to communicate with them have been in vain. They go about their work, seemingly oblivious to the hustle and bustle going on around them. Apart from curious scientists (and the occasional inconvenienced citizen who has had their office rearranged) most people on the Citadel stop noticing the keepers soon after they arrive.
If you choose synthesis, then what was the point of stopping Saren in ME1?Xilizhra wrote...
And yet it's a goal I can take in the end. In any case, Shepard only talks about destroying the Reapers specifically as a preference to TIM, who seems indoctrinated and whom my Shepard wants to pull back.Rifneno wrote...
Shepard. Not you. There are limits to roleplaying. You can no more choose the ridiculous goal of "saving" the Reapers than you can choose to quit being a soldier and get a desk job. It is simply not an option.Xilizhra wrote...
I set out to stop the Reapers. Via destruction or other means if possible.DoomsdayDevice wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
You do realize you're still taking a path laid out for you in Destroy, yes?
No, it's what Shepard set out to do from the very beginning.
I first thought the same that the decision part was on the Citadel, but if I recall correct, there has been an analysis in some of the ending-support threads that shows that the Crucible, right before docking to the Citadel, had something at its top that resembles a folded version of the decision chamber and that something disappears later in that cinematic of the docking sequence.Davik Kang wrote...
The only thing is I think the parts we see are part of the Citadel, not the Crucible. The beam comes from the Crucible but the tube and control panel etc. (whether they're real or hallucinatory) are part of the Citadel. Which I think makes it even more symbolic, because the Citadel is the crux of the whole story and all the cycles - advanced races find a relay, then discover the Citadel, and inevitably base their galactic civilisations around this Citadel.
This is also why I think the Citadel is the key to the whole story, and why I am really interested in seeing what CmdrShep, Magnetite and others come up with regarding the Keepers and Citadel.
Guest_magnetite_*
Modifié par magnetite, 06 novembre 2012 - 05:26 .
Yep. I set aside a good deal of time to look at that set of pictures and explanation, and I hope I don't come across as too arrogant (I may be unable to avoid this) when I conclude that the pictures are absolute garbage. They're just trying to draw on top of the game images something that they want to see.Restrider wrote...
I first thought the same that the decision part was on the Citadel, but if I recall correct, there has been an analysis in some of the ending-support threads that shows that the Crucible, right before docking to the Citadel, had something at its top that resembles a folded version of the decision chamber and that something disappears later in that cinematic of the docking sequence.
Modifié par Davik Kang, 06 novembre 2012 - 05:01 .
Well, I was just curious and as it was presented by the ending-supporters, it kind of made sense. But since it seems that happens only in high EMS Destroy and it is not that clear, I think it is a point open for debate. In any case, I would say that that is not really the tipping point that "proofs" IT or that "proofs" that there is something off about the Crucible. To debunk IT, there is a lot more needed.Davik Kang wrote...
Yep. I set aside a good deal of time to look at that set of pictures and explanation, and I hope I don't come across as too arrogant (I may be unable to avoid this) when I conclude that the pictures are absolute garbage. They're just trying to draw on top of the game images something that they want to see.Restrider wrote...
I first thought the same that the decision part was on the Citadel, but if I recall correct, there has been an analysis in some of the ending-support threads that shows that the Crucible, right before docking to the Citadel, had something at its top that resembles a folded version of the decision chamber and that something disappears later in that cinematic of the docking sequence.
To be more specific, the 'thing' that apparently 'unfolds' seems to disappear in High EMS, but remains in low EMS. This 'nubbin' is 4-pronged, and looks absolutely nothing like the 6-pronged onctraption on the Citadel at the connection point. Hence, imo, we need a lot more than that to demonstrate that it's part of the Crucible.
Modifié par masster blaster, 06 novembre 2012 - 05:15 .
No doubt the Crucible is fishy. I feel like it's just one clue around the corner from being completely understood...Restrider wrote...
Well, I was just curious and as it was presented by the ending-supporters, it kind of made sense. But since it seems that happens only in high EMS Destroy and it is not that clear, I think it is a point open for debate. In any case, I would say that that is not really the tipping point that "proofs" IT or that "proofs" that there is something off about the Crucible. To debunk IT, there is a lot more needed.
And the Crucible is fishy in its definition of a weapon/device that has been carried over several cycles, just appears out of the blue (let's see who gets this pun, hehe) and yet remained unnoticed by the Leviathans and Reapers, who admit to have known about it? I call BS...
masster blaster wrote...
Hey did we ever speculate on what happened to the Crucible? who was Controlling it to dock with the Citadel, and where did it go after we pick an ending? In Control it's gone and the Citadel is closing.
In Synthesis and Destroy the Citadel blows up, but the Crucible is gone? What's the deal with that. It's not like it blow up because if it did then Shepard/ the Chamber should begone. Think about it if you add more stuff to the Crucible, Hellium 3 fuel is in it weapons are in it, and dark matter is in it. Think of the explosion it will cause.
Shepard should be double dead. Just a thought.
Also is it me or does Sovgie when he is damaged when Shepard kills Saren again look like the Reapers getting all static with red electricity?
Modifié par Davik Kang, 06 novembre 2012 - 05:54 .
Wtf? I didn't even see that. Will edit. That's happened 3 times or so now... weirdRestrider wrote...
I see you like my posts so much, Davik, that you just quote them for truth?
TSA_383 wrote...
Sounds like people are being indoctrinated by the citadel...CmdrShep80 wrote...
From the wiki. Took a few to find it again-
The keepers themselves reveal nothing of their nature and often undertake tasks that seem bizarre to other races, like rearranging offices or even changing architecture down on the Wards, with no explanation. In fact, all attempts to communicate with them have been in vain. They go about their work, seemingly oblivious to the hustle and bustle going on around them. Apart from curious scientists (and the occasional inconvenienced citizen who has had their office rearranged) most people on the Citadel stop noticing the keepers soon after they arrive.
It's pretty interesting that we only see one of them in ME3 actually.
MaximizedAction wrote...
TSA_383 wrote...
Sounds like people are being indoctrinated by the citadel...CmdrShep80 wrote...
From the wiki. Took a few to find it again-
The keepers themselves reveal nothing of their nature and often undertake tasks that seem bizarre to other races, like rearranging offices or even changing architecture down on the Wards, with no explanation. In fact, all attempts to communicate with them have been in vain. They go about their work, seemingly oblivious to the hustle and bustle going on around them. Apart from curious scientists (and the occasional inconvenienced citizen who has had their office rearranged) most people on the Citadel stop noticing the keepers soon after they arrive.
It's pretty interesting that we only see one of them in ME3 actually.
Oh you...
Modifié par Dwailing, 06 novembre 2012 - 06:12 .