Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#44501
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

@ DD and RM...

sure, I understand that Destroy has to be presented as an option in IT. What I am getting at is:

why does Harbinger use the idea of killing synthetics to discourage Shepard? Why not use something else? We don't know what the Crucible does, so Harbinger could have used any BS to dissuade us from using it. Why not say that Earth would be destroyed instead, Death-star style?


Because that wouldn't make sense.

"You will destroy the Reapers, but also your home planet."

Say what?

At least presenting it in a way that seems consistent (destroy ALL synthetics, including the Reapers & a lot of technology) makes sense.

It could make sense as the Citadel is right above Earth and the beam is connected to it already.  Seems like a quite logical threat to me anyway...

#44502
Leonia

Leonia
  • Members
  • 9 496 messages
But non-Earthborn Shepards might not have cared about that. No, I'm sure the "synthetics v. organics" thing was supposed to be the focus of the whole Catalyst exchange, whether folks agree or not on that being a theme of the series. But I see where you're going with it, Davik, what if Shepard had chosen the quarians over the geth and not made peace and didn't care about EDI? Well, guess it's another illusion of choice moment where we're supposed to care about EDI's development at the very least and if we didn't get that bit of story then the ending isn't going to make much sense.

#44503
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages

Kyrene wrote...

Bill Casey wrote...

Bill Casey wrote...

Posted Image

Is that glowy green eyes?
If so, lulz
Double lulz if it turns out to be an adjutant...

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSa9nUdP_V1lbCfK2pjfLXNhW85u8-vrd-fKm041Rgq2RsWCqspEDmCJlkPYQ

Posted Image



#44504
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
I thought Bioware said we weren't going to fight them. Lies all lies! That's why Collectors are not in Omega because they fixed the problem, or did they not want to ruin the suprise.

#44505
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages
hello everybody!
Happy N7 day!
So, from what i read about omega it is entirely possible that it takes place at least AFTER sanctuary....

#44506
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

masster blaster wrote...

I thought Bioware said we weren't going to fight them. Lies all lies! That's why Collectors are not in Omega because they fixed the problem, or did they not want to ruin the suprise.


the collectors may or may not be in Omega, but that does not preven them from being in other future DLCs, like the Citadel DLC for example/

#44507
Ithurael

Ithurael
  • Members
  • 3 196 messages

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

I believe the three choices are 'reversed', so to speak.

I've said this before, but I don't think many people saw it.

The joke will be on Shepard in all three scenarios.

Pick control = Your mind will be controlled.
Pick synthesis = Your mind will be synthesized (Preserved in Reaper form).
Pick destroy = Your mind will be destroyed.

So in my interpretation, destroy is ALSO a trap. BUT, as it is the only option that does not go along with what the Reapers want, it is also the only option that resists indoctrination.

Therefore, Shepard's mind will be destroyed. (S)he wants to destroy the Reapers, will not be turned, and so will be destroyed, because (s)he is of no use to the Reapers.

The reason Shepard survives this in high EMS is because his/her mind/willpower is extremely strong in high EMS (as illustrated by all the war assets (s)he assembled).

So in low EMS, you can resist indoctrination by picking destroy, but your mind is not strong enough to survive.


How do war assets determine mental fortitude?

#44508
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages
 This looks very much like cerberus version of Firebase White...
Posted Image

Modifié par demersel, 07 novembre 2012 - 05:27 .


#44509
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Ithurael wrote...

How do war assets determine mental fortitude?


Self-confidence level? 

#44510
Leonia

Leonia
  • Members
  • 9 496 messages
Firebase White has Cerberus logos all over it already? Anyway, I seem to recall that Omega is playable just after Mars/Menae so the relation to Sanctuary events may or may not exist.

#44511
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

demersel wrote...

Ithurael wrote...

How do war assets determine mental fortitude?


Self-confidence level? 


Pretty much. And it makes just as much, if not more, sense as war assets determining which colour of magic can squirt out of the crucible.

Or whether or not Shepard can live to take a breath after being at the epicentre of an explosion the size of a planet.

#44512
BatmanTurian

BatmanTurian
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Fingertrip wrote...

I found new Indoctrination EVIDENCE in the FRENCH youtube clip of Mass Effect Omega 3 DLC clip!

There is a soldier holding his HANDS in the hair and then clinching his fist! It was even zoomed in and focused on. What does it MEAN?!


I'm going to start reporting you for harassment if you keep this childish BS up.

#44513
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

Eryri wrote...
Pretty much. And it makes just as much, if not more, sense as war assets determining which colour of magic can squirt out of the crucible. 

Or whether or not Shepard can live to take a breath after being at the epicentre of an explosion the size of a planet.

Not exactly.  The EMS score determines the level of protection afforded to the Crucible when it is brought to the Citadel.  The more protection there is, the less damage it takes en-route.  Once docked, the final level of damage affects the level of precision the Crucible can maintain.  A higher level of precision allows less collateral damage, additional options (the base option depends on whether proto-Reaper heart or brain was saved), and finally the breath scene.

For most war assets the more literal explantion works better, especially as the challenge of the Crucible was always to control the level of destruction it unleashes (this can be seen from in-game dialogue and the codex entry).  Though it does also make sense as measuring the level of support Shepard has gained.  Additionally, the survival of Anderson lending something like 900 war assets (in terms of keeping Shepard alive) does make more sense from the IT perspective - as measuring mental support for Shepard, rather than physical support for the Crucible.

#44514
Guest_magnetite_*

Guest_magnetite_*
  • Guests
Finished my video. Pretty much makes it very clear the ending is an indoctrination attempt.

#44515
Home run MF

Home run MF
  • Members
  • 805 messages
This is a Phantom on the Normandy. Shameless repost, hope no one minds :P

#44516
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages
I would argue that destroy is not a path set out for you by the Reapers. The mechanism by which you choose it, yes. The other two choices, especially synthesis, are introduced as possible in the decision chamber.

#44517
demersel

demersel
  • Members
  • 3 868 messages

Davik Kang wrote...

Eryri wrote...
Pretty much. And it makes just as much, if not more, sense as war assets determining which colour of magic can squirt out of the crucible. 

Or whether or not Shepard can live to take a breath after being at the epicentre of an explosion the size of a planet.

Not exactly.  The EMS score determines the level of protection afforded to the Crucible when it is brought to the Citadel.  The more protection there is, the less damage it takes en-route.  Once docked, the final level of damage affects the level of precision the Crucible can maintain.  A higher level of precision allows less collateral damage, additional options (the base option depends on whether proto-Reaper heart or brain was saved), and finally the breath scene.

For most war assets the more literal explantion works better, especially as the challenge of the Crucible was always to control the level of destruction it unleashes (this can be seen from in-game dialogue and the codex entry).  Though it does also make sense as measuring the level of support Shepard has gained.  Additionally, the survival of Anderson lending something like 900 war assets (in terms of keeping Shepard alive) does make more sense from the IT perspective - as measuring mental support for Shepard, rather than physical support for the Crucible.


this does not explain the thing with 4000 EMS needed to get the breath scene in destroy if you don't let illusive man shoot anderson, and 5000 ems needed if you do. (before EC values). 

If anything, this thing here alone is enough proof, that the ending is a dream and EMS is just your mental fortitude via self-confidence level

#44518
spotlessvoid

spotlessvoid
  • Members
  • 3 497 messages

magnetite wrote...

Finished my video. Pretty much makes it very clear the ending is an indoctrination attempt.


Very good! Might I suggest finding away to work the dreams/oily shadows in?

#44519
Guest_magnetite_*

Guest_magnetite_*
  • Guests

spotlessvoid wrote...

Very good! Might I suggest finding away to work the dreams/oily shadows in?


I was thinking of doing something with the Rachni Queen from Mass Effect 1, but maybe later, I have to go to work in about an hour.

#44520
Guest_starlitegirlx_*

Guest_starlitegirlx_*
  • Guests

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

Rifneno wrote...
No. Xil has never made a good point here. Hell, not even a decent one. She's become the poster child for people who don't get it and failed the test. You're misunderstanding what's going on too if you think she had a point. Destroy is not a path laid out for you by Starbinger. This whole thing is only happening in Shepard's subconscious. Destroy is the path that Shepard's subconscious has laid out. Control and synthesis are paths laid out by the Reapers. Starbinger only tries to dissaude you from destroy. It's presented as all negative vs. far superior options. You die, EDI dies, the geth dies, organic civilization is set far back, and eventually will be completely destroyed by "the problem." That is not a path that Starbinger gave you, that's a path that Starbinger is trying desperately to talk you away from.

I'm not a huge fan of Xil-bashing or anyone bashing for that matter.  I also think that Destroy is 'laid out' for you - we didn't choose to kill (or at least compromise) EDI or the Geth.  

But I do agree 100% with the rest.  It's not laid out by the Child.  He most certainly is trying desperately to talk you out of it.

The consequences of Destroy are the consequences of the Crucible design, and have nothing to do with the Reapers' goals or motives.  Destroy is, just like someone quoted recently, '[the only way] this ends today'.


Keep in mind that your take on this is slightly different because most people in this thread don't even think Shepard is on the Citadel, or that the crucible is used at all. ;)


Yep! And I maintain that control and synthesis are options created within shepard's mind that stem from having to resolve quarian/geth conflict which was about the quarians wanting to maintain control of the geth and from having to resolve the genophage which involved turians/salarians and krogans and was meddling with natural evolution. I also think the primary reasons these two other solutions appear has nothing to do with the reapers other than they are just trying to indoctrinate her. Her mind is creating the hallucination/nightmare/delusion from her experience (hence the boy whom I believe she really did see in the duct and on the roof since there is evidence of duct rats from mouse in ME2). So the reapers are weakening her will, as represented as many have posted her in her responses. Renegade is resolve and willpower while paragon is weakened will and losing resolve. This appears the in the chamber and I believe the three choices are are relevant to the fact that she has had close relationships with a member of each of the species involved in those choices - morid, garrus, wrex, tali and legion. They all represent very difficult 'god' choices shepard had to made each of which (during the course of ME3) could have led to the destruction of the species of whom she had a close friend. Every choice, no matter which one she took presents future possibilities (carefully constructed by BW) that could end with war and even at some point annihiliation of that species. Krogans can rebel and slaughter the Salarians and Turians. Geth could rebel as slaughter the quarians. Quarians could rebel and slaughter the geth. Or the genophage doesn't get cured and at some point it is possible the krogan die out as a species despite their best efforts since eve was the only one that was immune to the genophage and fertile females were limited offspring was diminishing - also Mordin fixed that they were adapting as admitted by him in ME2. So Krogans without genophage cure could become extinct.

I believe the whole construct of the choices is the end result of shepard having to play god during those key moments in order to gain allies to save earth. No matter what shepard did, each choice held the likely possibility that a species to which she had known someone closely could face annihilation or damn near close. And ironically, she's trying to save the galaxy from the reapers while doing it at the cost of other species. I think the ruthless calculus of war was very much in his/her subconscious and that is how it presented itself. not having the will to destroy is allowing the reapers to take control. Choose lots of those paragon choices and odds are you will choose control or synthsis because you ae playing it safe and trying to save everyone, however, throughout the game, we're told you cannot save everyone. It begins with shepard's reply to anderson as they are excaping after the reapers hit. 

Modifié par starlitegirlx, 07 novembre 2012 - 07:21 .


#44521
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

demersel wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

Eryri wrote...
Pretty much. And it makes just as much, if not more, sense as war assets determining which colour of magic can squirt out of the crucible. 

Or whether or not Shepard can live to take a breath after being at the epicentre of an explosion the size of a planet.

Not exactly.  The EMS score determines the level of protection afforded to the Crucible when it is brought to the Citadel.  The more protection there is, the less damage it takes en-route.  Once docked, the final level of damage affects the level of precision the Crucible can maintain.  A higher level of precision allows less collateral damage, additional options (the base option depends on whether proto-Reaper heart or brain was saved), and finally the breath scene.

For most war assets the more literal explantion works better, especially as the challenge of the Crucible was always to control the level of destruction it unleashes (this can be seen from in-game dialogue and the codex entry).  Though it does also make sense as measuring the level of support Shepard has gained.  Additionally, the survival of Anderson lending something like 900 war assets (in terms of keeping Shepard alive) does make more sense from the IT perspective - as measuring mental support for Shepard, rather than physical support for the Crucible.


this does not explain the thing with 4000 EMS needed to get the breath scene in destroy if you don't let illusive man shoot anderson, and 5000 ems needed if you do. (before EC values). 

If anything, this thing here alone is enough proof, that the ending is a dream and EMS is just your mental fortitude via self-confidence level


Huh?  The end of my post is entirely dedicated to what you just said.  Btw, it's evidence but not proof.

#44522
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
Hello.

#44523
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages
Hi folks, Threads a bit quiet today.

Article here about omega - http://www.eurogamer...r-in-4-hour-dlc.

Regrettably, it looks like it will be quite divorced from the main plot. We'll be unable to bring the main squad to Omega, or use Aria or Nyreen as permanent squadmates. Thane's little room remains empty it would seem.

On the plus side we 'll be getting to fight adjutants after all. As they're Cerberus controlled "artificially" reaperized creatures, they may provide more foreshadowing against the evils of control and / or synthesis.

Apart from that it looks like it might be another You-tube job for me. How about you guys?

Modifié par Eryri, 07 novembre 2012 - 08:35 .


#44524
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

Eryri wrote...

Apart from that it looks like it might be another You-tube job for me. How about you guys?


Same here. I've got a BW points card for two normal DLC and I do not intend to spend more on ME3. Since this one costs ~1.5 DLC, I'll sit this one out, too. After all, if the Citadel DLC is legit and contains what is rumored, I'm much more looking forward to that. Also, who knows what the future will bring in terms of DLC...

Also: I was hoping that the female turian would end up as a permanent squadmate...sadly no. And no new hub? Feelssadman

Modifié par MaximizedAction, 07 novembre 2012 - 08:52 .


#44525
Hrothdane

Hrothdane
  • Members
  • 1 208 messages
A "no comment" on the question of Citadel DLC. Hmm....