Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#45901
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

Of course, it's not said explicitly that this is supposed to be a human. But then again, this is not my field of study. Any experts here? Can this still be a human? Nuclein acids of any other part of the human system?


Well I'm certainly not an expert, but I always did like biology, and that's a pretty poor model of a DNA molecule. In real DNA the sides of the "ladder" are chains of sugar and phosphate groups. In this image those are missing, there's just empty space between the bases.

Apart from that; DNA is DNA. It's very similar across almost all life on earth - you can't tell if its from a fungus or a human just by looking at it. Its the order of the bases that makes the difference, and even that is highly conserved. I think we share something like 50% of our genes with yeast.

Correction 50% with bananas - I knew it was something unlikely.

Modifié par Eryri, 12 novembre 2012 - 09:31 .


#45902
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

OneWithTheAssassins wrote...

Eryri wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Quite quite in here. Oh well...oh, what's this:

www.express.co.uk/posts/view/357610/Darth-Vader-to-be-resurrected

rightinthechildhood.png



:huh:Oh dear God no! :?:blink::pinched::unsure::crying:

Is nothing sacred anymore?

I had hoped the Star Wars franchise would improve without Lucas' control freakery. Alas not it would seem.

And this fact alone is solid proof that Disney will kill star wars.
I'll go get the nails for the coffin.


Oh ffs DIDN'T THEY ALREADY DO THIS?! If I remember correctly, they brought Vader back in one of the books. And even if they didn't bring him back, I KNOW they brought the Emporer back in the books at one point. IT'S NOT THE END OF THE WORLD!

Modifié par Dwailing, 12 novembre 2012 - 09:33 .


#45903
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Eryri wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Of course, it's not said explicitly that this is supposed to be a human. But then again, this is not my field of study. Any experts here? Can this still be a human? Nuclein acids of any other part of the human system?


Well I'm certainly not an expert, but I always did like biology, and its a pretty poor model of a DNA molecule. In real DNA the sides of the "ladder" are chains of sugar and phosphate groups. In this image those are missing, there's just empty space between the bases.

Apart from that DNA is DNA. It's very similar across almost all life on earth - you can't tell if its from a fungus or a human just by looking at it. Its the order of the bases that makes the difference, and even that is highly conserved. I think we share something like 50% of our genes with yeast.

Correction 50% with bananas - I knew it was something unlikely.

Yeah, I remember when I first learned that animals and plants share DNA fragments. I was both surprised and amazed at the same time.

Modifié par paxxton, 12 novembre 2012 - 09:33 .


#45904
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

The problem we will run into if it's an IT dlc, then Literalist will b**** about " They did this to shut you up, and it wasn't intended" No offence but I am going to post a video clip of Master chief from Arby and Chief were Chief is dropping the F boom on online.

If we are at the point were IT DLC is released, do you think anyone will care what the literalists say about it?
The only thing most ITers would try to do is not to burst into all those literalist threads shouting the biggest "I TOLD YOU SO!" of gaming history...


Basically.

I won't be gloating all over the place, but I'll at least go "No. The signs were all there. It's ok to not look deep enough into a fiction to understand that because:

1)Sometimes its crazy to do so (lots of fan theories about stuff can be 100% wrong, of coruse)

2)Sometimes your mind is really quite unable to look at stories in that way. I just had a 1-2 hour discussion with my boyfriend about that yesterday in fact. I see stories in a very broad way, focusing on narrative and symbolic trends, but I have trouble describing smaller visual and auditory aspects (I'm bad at describing things in my writing, too), but my boyfriend, partly due to his synesthesia imo, is very 'in the moment' with things, moving from point to point in a story, and only able to comprehend the bigger picture once it's spelled out to him. Reminds me of Xil in that way, who I think said she'll pick Destroy if IT is confirmed, still dislike it, but accept it.

But once the IT DLC is out, its canon, so stop, is what I say to literalists. ME3 may eternally have multiple interpretations, but an IT DLC or full expansion will have its own interpretation, that will continue onto later games lol.

#45905
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

The whole point would be to obtain Shepard. That's actually the continued mystery that even Leviathan adds on more speculation about.

Now, there could be a ton of other objectives, like collecting all the galaxy's forces together for something, but we *know* Harbinger is friggin obsessed with Shepard. We can also assume that the Reapers/Harbinger doesn't ever actually think they're going to lose, and that they have all the time in the world. It is true that ME2 was barely even a setback, when put into context.

But I consider Crucible to be more than a trap. Like its name, its a test, a test to unite the galaxy's resources and peoples onto a singular goal.

Yeah ok.  I never saw Shepard as a singularly important goal... more I figured that Harbinger and Leviathan 'noticed' Shepard simply because she was constantly able to defeat Reaper plans and Reaper presence everywhere she went. and even unite a galaxy, where other superpowers (Cerberus, Quarians, sometimes even the Coucil) sought to divide it.

So I think Shepard became important as an adversary, rather than the plan all along was to trap Shepard because of her 'destiny'.  I figured if they needed an individual that Saren or Javik or maybe even TIM would've been acceptable.

I guess what I'm saying is that I figured the repeated attempts on Shepard's life were genuine, and I'm not sure how fondly I'd look back on the story if they were intentionally keeping her alive all along.  Personally I'd prefer that Shepard had to earn her greatness, rather than simply being marked for it.  But such stories have been written before, and I guess it wouldn't change things that much (protagonists will almost always survive to the end of a story, so they're narratively invincible anyway and Shepard's no different here).

#45906
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Rifneno wrote...

paxxton wrote...

Even if it was a dream, what matters is the experience of playing 3 games. That'd stay with you and all the fans regardless of whether it all happened or not. That's why I wouldn't be upset if it turned out that way.


Considering the fact that arguably the biggest reason people hate IT is that it means even the small portion of ME3 that everyone hates "didn't really happen", I dare say you're in the tiny, tiny, microscopic minority that wouldn't mind if all 3 games "didn't really happen."


I agree.

I'm personally fine with it becoming an increasing hallucination since Arrival, sure (even if he was starting under indoctrination since beginning of ME2 or whatever, Shepard's uniquely strong will would have held it back, intreguing Harbinger), but all of it?

No.

It even defeats the entire purpose, imo.

Beam run onward being a full hallucination/dream is actually kinda badass, AS LONG AS it has follow up. Some players may love it (hi Bill Casey!) and I understand why, but I don't think its a satisfying conclusion even if IT is true.

#45907
paxxton

paxxton
  • Members
  • 8 445 messages

Dwailing wrote...

OneWithTheAssassins wrote...

Eryri wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Quite quite in here. Oh well...oh, what's this:

www.express.co.uk/posts/view/357610/Darth-Vader-to-be-resurrected

rightinthechildhood.png



:huh:Oh dear God no! :?:blink::pinched::unsure::crying:

Is nothing sacred anymore?

I had hoped the Star Wars franchise would improve without Lucas' control freakery. Alas not it would seem.

And this fact alone is solid proof that Disney will kill star wars.
I'll go get the nails for the coffin.


Oh ffs DIDN'T THEY ALREADY DO THIS?! If I remember correctly, they brought Vader back in one of the books. And even if they didn't bring him back, I KNOW they brought the Emporer back in the books at one point. IT'S NOT THE END OF THE WORLD!

Besides, Star Wars isn't really serious stuff. Not like Star Trek or even Mass Effect. SW is more of a fairy tale.

Modifié par paxxton, 12 novembre 2012 - 09:39 .


#45908
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

MaximizedAction wrote...

Quite quite in here. Oh well...oh, what's this:

www.express.co.uk/posts/view/357610/Darth-Vader-to-be-resurrected

rightinthechildhood.png


If that's possible, I say have Shepard wake up and finish his damn fight.


I don't even.

#45909
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 12 076 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

The problem we will run into if it's an IT dlc, then Literalist will b**** about " They did this to shut you up, and it wasn't intended" No offence but I am going to post a video clip of Master chief from Arby and Chief were Chief is dropping the F boom on online.

If we are at the point were IT DLC is released, do you think anyone will care what the literalists say about it?
The only thing most ITers would try to do is not to burst into all those literalist threads shouting the biggest "I TOLD YOU SO!" of gaming history...


Basically.

I won't be gloating all over the place, but I'll at least go "No. The signs were all there. It's ok to not look deep enough into a fiction to understand that because:

1)Sometimes its crazy to do so (lots of fan theories about stuff can be 100% wrong, of coruse)

2)Sometimes your mind is really quite unable to look at stories in that way. I just had a 1-2 hour discussion with my boyfriend about that yesterday in fact. I see stories in a very broad way, focusing on narrative and symbolic trends, but I have trouble describing smaller visual and auditory aspects (I'm bad at describing things in my writing, too), but my boyfriend, partly due to his synesthesia imo, is very 'in the moment' with things, moving from point to point in a story, and only able to comprehend the bigger picture once it's spelled out to him. Reminds me of Xil in that way, who I think said she'll pick Destroy if IT is confirmed, still dislike it, but accept it.

But once the IT DLC is out, its canon, so stop, is what I say to literalists. ME3 may eternally have multiple interpretations, but an IT DLC or full expansion will have its own interpretation, that will continue onto later games lol.


Yeah, I'll try to be respectful and show restraint...  but then again, restraint isn't exactly my strong point, so worst case scenario involves a billboard in Times Square.

#45910
MaximizedAction

MaximizedAction
  • Members
  • 3 293 messages

paxxton wrote...
Besides, Star Wars isn't really serious stuff. Not like Star Trek or even Mass Effect. SW is more of a fairy tale.


See Star Trek reboot ala parallel universe. Nothin is sacred.

Nah, but I do hope there won't be any parallel universe stuff in the new SW movies. But I sure was hoping for something like the Thrawn trilogy.

/nerdmode

#45911
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

Rifneno wrote...

Yeah, I'll try to be respectful and show restraint...  but then again, restraint isn't exactly my strong point, so worst case scenario involves a billboard in Times Square.


:D Yes, of course, me too. I shall be mature and dignified and magnanimous in victory. And I will absolutely, positively, not post this, anywhere on the BSN. (however much I may be tempted :devil:)

Modifié par Eryri, 12 novembre 2012 - 09:54 .


#45912
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...

The whole point would be to obtain Shepard. That's actually the continued mystery that even Leviathan adds on more speculation about.

Now, there could be a ton of other objectives, like collecting all the galaxy's forces together for something, but we *know* Harbinger is friggin obsessed with Shepard. We can also assume that the Reapers/Harbinger doesn't ever actually think they're going to lose, and that they have all the time in the world. It is true that ME2 was barely even a setback, when put into context.

But I consider Crucible to be more than a trap. Like its name, its a test, a test to unite the galaxy's resources and peoples onto a singular goal.

Yeah ok.  I never saw Shepard as a singularly important goal... more I figured that Harbinger and Leviathan 'noticed' Shepard simply because she was constantly able to defeat Reaper plans and Reaper presence everywhere she went. and even unite a galaxy, where other superpowers (Cerberus, Quarians, sometimes even the Coucil) sought to divide it.

So I think Shepard became important as an adversary, rather than the plan all along was to trap Shepard because of her 'destiny'.  I figured if they needed an individual that Saren or Javik or maybe even TIM would've been acceptable.

I guess what I'm saying is that I figured the repeated attempts on Shepard's life were genuine, and I'm not sure how fondly I'd look back on the story if they were intentionally keeping her alive all along.  Personally I'd prefer that Shepard had to earn her greatness, rather than simply being marked for it.  But such stories have been written before, and I guess it wouldn't change things that much (protagonists will almost always survive to the end of a story, so they're narratively invincible anyway and Shepard's no different here).


I think its more "Capture him, dead." and as Shepard increasingly does the badass, it becomes more and more "Capture him, dead or alive." and now in ME3 "Capture him, alive and willing."

I'm thinking back to the 'leaked script' that had the Reapers talk to Shepard and say something like "We are Shepards too".

Basically, that each Reaper has an uberconsciousness that is indoctrinated into the fold, and Shepard may be the most powerful in will than any of the rest.

And Javik may have been the Prothian cycle 'avatar', but was lost to it and resisted any efforts to obtain him til the end. (I consider the Prothian cycle to be uniquely equipped due to Leviathan manipulations, but whatever)
(this also might be related to the original idea of Javik being the Catalyst)


So getting Shepard may not be a singlularly important goal, but it may be the reason for TWO things:

1)The Reapers roflstomping Earth first, and focusing on humanity and their genetic qualities

but also

2)The Reapers holding back somewhat, both on the larger scale (ignoring Citadel, harvesting asap instead of expanding to attack everywhere), and the smaller scale (EDI even notes that the Reapers should have overcome the London FOB a while ago).

I kinda see Shepard's presence in the series as being simultaniously the reason for the Reapers to pinpoint where he is and focus there, but also the reason for Shepard rising to the challenge (ha, just like in Shepard's las speech) and succeeding.

So the Crucible run is the final test of that, in the subtext. You've gathered everyone (good!), but also led them into a trap (bad!), but together, you may all overcome that (like ME1/ME2!) and kick the Reapers in the balls.

We just haven't seen the kicking in the balls part yet. $$$$$ for EA, after all.

#45913
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

Rifneno wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...

Restrider wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

The problem we will run into if it's an IT dlc, then Literalist will b**** about " They did this to shut you up, and it wasn't intended" No offence but I am going to post a video clip of Master chief from Arby and Chief were Chief is dropping the F boom on online.

If we are at the point were IT DLC is released, do you think anyone will care what the literalists say about it?
The only thing most ITers would try to do is not to burst into all those literalist threads shouting the biggest "I TOLD YOU SO!" of gaming history...


Basically.

I won't be gloating all over the place, but I'll at least go "No. The signs were all there. It's ok to not look deep enough into a fiction to understand that because:

1)Sometimes its crazy to do so (lots of fan theories about stuff can be 100% wrong, of coruse)

2)Sometimes your mind is really quite unable to look at stories in that way. I just had a 1-2 hour discussion with my boyfriend about that yesterday in fact. I see stories in a very broad way, focusing on narrative and symbolic trends, but I have trouble describing smaller visual and auditory aspects (I'm bad at describing things in my writing, too), but my boyfriend, partly due to his synesthesia imo, is very 'in the moment' with things, moving from point to point in a story, and only able to comprehend the bigger picture once it's spelled out to him. Reminds me of Xil in that way, who I think said she'll pick Destroy if IT is confirmed, still dislike it, but accept it.

But once the IT DLC is out, its canon, so stop, is what I say to literalists. ME3 may eternally have multiple interpretations, but an IT DLC or full expansion will have its own interpretation, that will continue onto later games lol.


Yeah, I'll try to be respectful and show restraint...  but then again, restraint isn't exactly my strong point, so worst case scenario involves a billboard in Times Square.


Oh man, I would pay serious money (If I had it) to see that. What can I say, I'm a nice guy, but it's always the nice guys that have the biggest mean streaks (Remember Tali and the racist volus?).

#45914
Eryri

Eryri
  • Members
  • 1 853 messages

MaximizedAction wrote...

paxxton wrote...
Besides, Star Wars isn't really serious stuff. Not like Star Trek or even Mass Effect. SW is more of a fairy tale.


See Star Trek reboot ala parallel universe. Nothin is sacred.

Nah, but I do hope there won't be any parallel universe stuff in the new SW movies. But I sure was hoping for something like the Thrawn trilogy.

/nerdmode


Actually I didn't mind the parallel universe reboot in Star Trek. That kind of thing happens in ST all the time, but always somehow gets changed back to normal by the end of the episode. It was quite refreshing to see it have permanent consequences for a change.

But bringing back Vader in SW... His story's done. He found redemption and died in peace. There's no need to dig him up just to hang a reheated plot from. I'd rather see something new in the SW universe.

#45915
gunslinger_ruiz

gunslinger_ruiz
  • Members
  • 1 650 messages
Blog updated incase no one saw it yet: http://blog.bioware....oware-montreal/

Heh, anyone looking a job at Bioware? Sounds like it's fun, doubt I qualify.

#45916
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

Davik Kang wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...

The whole point would be to obtain Shepard. That's actually the continued mystery that even Leviathan adds on more speculation about.

Now, there could be a ton of other objectives, like collecting all the galaxy's forces together for something, but we *know* Harbinger is friggin obsessed with Shepard. We can also assume that the Reapers/Harbinger doesn't ever actually think they're going to lose, and that they have all the time in the world. It is true that ME2 was barely even a setback, when put into context.

But I consider Crucible to be more than a trap. Like its name, its a test, a test to unite the galaxy's resources and peoples onto a singular goal.

Yeah ok.  I never saw Shepard as a singularly important goal... more I figured that Harbinger and Leviathan 'noticed' Shepard simply because she was constantly able to defeat Reaper plans and Reaper presence everywhere she went. and even unite a galaxy, where other superpowers (Cerberus, Quarians, sometimes even the Coucil) sought to divide it.

So I think Shepard became important as an adversary, rather than the plan all along was to trap Shepard because of her 'destiny'.  I figured if they needed an individual that Saren or Javik or maybe even TIM would've been acceptable.

I guess what I'm saying is that I figured the repeated attempts on Shepard's life were genuine, and I'm not sure how fondly I'd look back on the story if they were intentionally keeping her alive all along.  Personally I'd prefer that Shepard had to earn her greatness, rather than simply being marked for it.  But such stories have been written before, and I guess it wouldn't change things that much (protagonists will almost always survive to the end of a story, so they're narratively invincible anyway and Shepard's no different here).


I think its more "Capture him, dead." and as Shepard increasingly does the badass, it becomes more and more "Capture him, dead or alive." and now in ME3 "Capture him, alive and willing."

I'm thinking back to the 'leaked script' that had the Reapers talk to Shepard and say something like "We are Shepards too".

Basically, that each Reaper has an uberconsciousness that is indoctrinated into the fold, and Shepard may be the most powerful in will than any of the rest.

And Javik may have been the Prothian cycle 'avatar', but was lost to it and resisted any efforts to obtain him til the end. (I consider the Prothian cycle to be uniquely equipped due to Leviathan manipulations, but whatever)
(this also might be related to the original idea of Javik being the Catalyst)


So getting Shepard may not be a singlularly important goal, but it may be the reason for TWO things:

1)The Reapers roflstomping Earth first, and focusing on humanity and their genetic qualities

but also

2)The Reapers holding back somewhat, both on the larger scale (ignoring Citadel, harvesting asap instead of expanding to attack everywhere), and the smaller scale (EDI even notes that the Reapers should have overcome the London FOB a while ago).

I kinda see Shepard's presence in the series as being simultaniously the reason for the Reapers to pinpoint where he is and focus there, but also the reason for Shepard rising to the challenge (ha, just like in Shepard's las speech) and succeeding.

So the Crucible run is the final test of that, in the subtext. You've gathered everyone (good!), but also led them into a trap (bad!), but together, you may all overcome that (like ME1/ME2!) and kick the Reapers in the balls.

We just haven't seen the kicking in the balls part yet. $$$$$ for EA, after all.


Huh, I think you might be on to something with the bolded text.  Remember Sovvy?  "Each a nation, independant."  And what does EVERY nation have?  A leader.

#45917
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests
Yep.

I think the Reapers would have had a priority on who would be harvested.

First: Asari, they seem appropriate for it.
Second: Turian, hi Saren.
Third: Whoops, Saren is dead. WTF is this Shepard dude? Whoh, he did THAT?

Commence harvest of humanity. Reach into TIM to have him resurrect Shepard as he was before. We gotta do this right.

#45918
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages

Eryri wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

paxxton wrote...
Besides, Star Wars isn't really serious stuff. Not like Star Trek or even Mass Effect. SW is more of a fairy tale.


See Star Trek reboot ala parallel universe. Nothin is sacred.

Nah, but I do hope there won't be any parallel universe stuff in the new SW movies. But I sure was hoping for something like the Thrawn trilogy.

/nerdmode


Actually I didn't mind the parallel universe reboot in Star Trek. That kind of thing happens in ST all the time, but always somehow gets changed back to normal by the end of the episode. It was quite refreshing to see it have permanent consequences for a change.

But bringing back Vader in SW... His story's done. He found redemption and died in peace. There's no need to dig him up just to hang a reheated plot from. I'd rather see something new in the SW universe.


I liked the '09 reboot of Star Trek a lot.  It was great, it was respectful to Star Trek's heritage, but it also did it's own thing.  I hope we see something like that with the new Star Wars, and with the new Mass Effect.

#45919
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

SwobyJ wrote...

I'm thinking back to the 'leaked script' that had the Reapers talk to Shepard and say something like "We are Shepards too".

Can someone link me to that text again?  I keep mentioning it but I can never find it.

#45920
Guest_SwobyJ_*

Guest_SwobyJ_*
  • Guests

Davik Kang wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...

I'm thinking back to the 'leaked script' that had the Reapers talk to Shepard and say something like "We are Shepards too".

Can someone link me to that text again?  I keep mentioning it but I can never find it.


Sorry :(. I used to know, but forgot.

#45921
Davik Kang

Davik Kang
  • Members
  • 1 547 messages

SwobyJ wrote...
Sorry :(. I used to know, but forgot.

Do you remember any lines or unusual words?  If I could just remember a little bit of the text I could Google it.  That's how I found it last time.  I'm sure it said something about harvesting or machinery, but I need something more specific.

Modifié par Davik Kang, 12 novembre 2012 - 10:17 .


#45922
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages

Dwailing wrote...

OneWithTheAssassins wrote...

Eryri wrote...

MaximizedAction wrote...

Quite quite in here. Oh well...oh, what's this:

www.express.co.uk/posts/view/357610/Darth-Vader-to-be-resurrected

rightinthechildhood.png



:huh:Oh dear God no! :?:blink::pinched::unsure::crying:

Is nothing sacred anymore?

I had hoped the Star Wars franchise would improve without Lucas' control freakery. Alas not it would seem.

And this fact alone is solid proof that Disney will kill star wars.
I'll go get the nails for the coffin.


Oh ffs DIDN'T THEY ALREADY DO THIS?! If I remember correctly, they brought Vader back in one of the books. And even if they didn't bring him back, I KNOW they brought the Emporer back in the books at one point. IT'S NOT THE END OF THE WORLD!


Its not the end of the world, but it does seem to mean they're ignoring all the books completely. Having never actually read them, I cannot say whether or not this is a good thing.

#45923
Restrider

Restrider
  • Members
  • 1 986 messages
So, this EDI line about the Reapers holding their forces back.
I found that odd in my first playthrough and have mostly forgotten it since then. How do literalists interpret that? Another "Bad Writing" incident?

#45924
hiraeth

hiraeth
  • Members
  • 1 055 messages
https://twitter.com/...11597728309248' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'> https://twitter.com/Mark_Meer/status/268111597728309248
confession: every time mark meer tweets that he's been doing VO for ME i get a little giddy inside and i think "omg is it the awakening DLC?!"

:o

#45925
Dwailing

Dwailing
  • Members
  • 4 566 messages
Well, based on some quick research, I don't think Vader was ever resurrected. However, I'm quite certain that the Emperor was resurrected, so it's not without precedent.

Edit: Top.

Modifié par Dwailing, 12 novembre 2012 - 10:27 .