Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
CmdrShep80 wrote...
ChristianHarper wrote...
Yeah, sorry Bardox. I ain't buying your take on it.
All this speculation... What is it all really about? Answer = Shepard.
From the opening scene of Mass Effect, Anderson and Udina are discussing how important Shepard is in representing humanity to the council as a Spectre. In ME2, Shepard comes back from the dead, and we learn how Shepard is more than just another soldier. He is a symbol. In ME3, Leviathan tells Shepard that all of his victories are more than chance and that the Reapers see him as a threat. Not to mention little things like defeating Sovereign, the Collectors, Cerberus and killing multiple Reapers.
Harbinger wants Shepard. He IS unique, unlike anyone that Harbinger has encountered before. Maybe that's why they were building a human Reaper, when all other Reapers look like Leviathans.
All I know is that Shepard truly is an anomaly, and that IT makes the most sense to me.
i would love to know more about the context behind the ME1 game prologue. Why Shepard? How did they know Shepard would be the best choice? What are they saying he would be the best at? Looking back on it I have to wonder will we have a dlc explaining this?
Probably related to the Service history you choose where Shepard performed exemplary or survived something extreme. I even think the words used when talking about Shepard in the prologue is changed based on the service record.
The thing is it goes:
(almost as if we joined mid conversation)
Udina: Well what about Shepard? (insert your prefered history) Earthborn...but no record of his family.
Captain Anderson: Doesn't have one. He was raised on the streets. Learned to look out for himself.
Admiral Hackett: He saw his whole unit die on Akuze. He could have some serious emotional scars.
Captain Anderson: Every soldier has scars. Shepard's a survivor.
(So far in this context, there's nothing unique or special about Shepard. This all changes depending on the service history you choose. He looks like everyone else who's been in battle, or even went to the Alliance Acadamy)
Udina: Is that the kind of person we want protecting the galaxy?
Captain Anderson: That's the only kind of person who can protect the galaxy.
Udina: I'll make the call.
(This part of the context is the part I want to know more about as well as the converation piece before this all started. All of it is the same no matter the service history)
What led Anderson, Hackett, and Udina to come to this conclusion? Granted they could simply be talking about a desire to have a human represented as a Spectre or on the Council "protecting the galaxy." But at the same time they could also be talking about choosing a Human that would become the next Reaper. And just as well, talking about the Human who can truely save everyone
But still after the context of the other two games, who knows when Udina was orginally indoctrinated? Hackett and Anderson, are they indoctrinated or are they not? We don't have enough details in ME1 (yet) but by the time Priority Earth rolls around, likely Anderson's indoctrinated but likely Hackett is not.
It's entirely possible, that the whole prologue set in motion the "uplifting" of Shepard in one of two directions, uplifting for the benefit of Harbinger or uplifting for the benefit of the Leviathans. Sovereign, the Leviathans, Kai Leng, and TIM all were in play before Shepard walked on to the scene. Harbinger was not until at least the end of ME1 because he had to wait in dark space for the signal from Soverign who brute force sent a signal else, the citadel would have been overrun before ME1 even started.
Modifié par CmdrShep80, 20 novembre 2012 - 08:54 .