Aller au contenu

Photo

Was the Ending a Hallucination? - Indoctrination Theory Mark III!


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
80611 réponses à ce sujet

#48476
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages

EXMEFan wrote...

 My Final Point to Prove the whole theory wrong:
You forget in Mass Effect 2, at the beginning, the Reapers sent the Collectors to kill Shepard, and they succeeded.  The Illusive Man brought him back to life, in which they Reapers didn't see coming, and depending on your actions you STOP a big Reapers project, and destroy a main base of the collectors.

Point: Reapers feared Shepard and wanting him dead, and I'm pretty sure they didn't want their own base blown up, and or in enemy hands.

Now, in the ME 3, the Reapers attack EARTH FIRST for the primary reason that they felt like because of Shepard, the  humans were the biggest threat to them achieving their ONE AND ONLY GOAL, of DESTROYING ADVANCE CIVILIZATION.

Point: Reapers try to kill Shepard again, and at least tried to take out the humans first.  This way, their path to their ONLY GOAL, destorying civilization, can go on without much more problems.  They did not want the humans and especially shepard involved.
Every time a strong minded person was indoctrinated they used their
motives against them, and made them do evil things that they thought
were the right things to do.  
Thats Saren, and thats Illusive man.....in this game Shepard could have done one of three things depending on the situation.  

Point:
Shepard has no STORY motive but to destory the Reapers, YOU as the
PLAYER created his alternative motives, his choices, and his drive.  By
the power of him not being a static character, indoctrination doesn't
work with Shepard, and it would be a bad literary and game device.  They
don't even flirt with him being indoctrinated because of this very
fact.

And by the time all hell broke loose, it was the end of the
game, and why would the Reapers let Shepard assemble a whole fleet and
unite the galaxy, when a broken galaxy was the reason the Reapers won in
the first place?  You learn this in the Promethean DLC.  The reason the
Reapers won was because the galaxy was divided, and they had only one
thought and one plan of attack because they only had one civilizations
mind.

Point: In order for Shepard to have been indoctrinated the
whole time, they would have had to let him unite the galaxy, which is
counter productive to what the game actually states as the main reason
the Reapers were able to succeed, a "Divided" galaxy.

The ending used the indoctrination theory on the Illusive man....

Point:
The indoctrination theory, every time it was used, was outted in plot.
 The Ilusive man was the one under indoctrination at the end of ME3, and
you were able to talk him out of it by at least making him kill
himself.  He was still grounded in reality, but his motives were taken
way into the extreme, hence they end up working for the Reapers.

I
doubt two Indoctrinated people would sit there and have a conversation,
where one convinces the other of his wrong doing, so much that he kills
himself.   Why would the story reveal the indoctrination of one, and
not the other.  Also Illusive Man's indoctrination was hinted at the
whole second half of the game.

The things you guys are talking
about were explaining The Illusive Man's indoctrination.....HIS
motives.....the reason why HE was able to be controlled.   He was lost
in a dream state, he was being used.

This is not hinted what so ever about Shepard.

The
theory is dumb.  I proved it wrong. You would have to ignore a lot of
facts, like the reapers attacking Earth First, KILLING Shepard, and
allowing him to organize the universe when they would be better off if
that not happened.

The reason the game existed in Shepards point
of view as the fact he was unique, that his resolve was stronger than
anybody else...

And if he was a victim of being indoctrinated,
that would render the character no different than anybody else in the
game, and kill the reason WHY  he was the hope for the universe. 

The
fact is, it was something different about Shepard that brought people
together, that handled problems, and that the Reapers feared and wanted
him dead.

Your theories kill the meaning of the game....your
theories render the game being played useless...Your theory kill the
soul of who Shepard was, and what Mass Effect was all about....

I am done. You guys are 100% wrong...


Restrider wrote...

----------Preamble----------


This list has been compiled to enable an easy access to The Indoctrination Theory. While there are many other aspects, hints and signs throughout Mass Effect 3 and the entire trilogy that may also point to The Indoctrination Theory,
the concepts presented in this list are - to the best of my knowledge -
the most compelling ones. Take into account that my role in this
undertaking was mainly the role of an editor, though many broader
suggestions I found to be convincing, made it into the list. The vast
majority of the points listed below were reported by fellow associates
of The Indoctrination Theory and they deserve the correspondent gratitude.
The order of the list was determined through surveys and polls that can be found here.




----------The Ten Most Important Concepts Supporting The Indoctrination Theory----------


     
        I) Indoctrination in general :

          1.   Regarding IT, Shepard is in the process of indoctrination and the outcome is decided by the final decision taken.
          2.   The concept of indoctrination is a crucial part throughout the trilogy and nothing new to the player (link 1 and 2).
          3.   Rana Thanoptis is an example of how subtle and slow indoctrination can be.
          4.   Shepard knocked out for two days by a Reaper artifact that indoctrinated an entire facility.
          5.   Logs on the derelict Reaper illustrate the reactions of victims of indoctrination.
          6.   Paul Grayson's indoctrination show its effects on someone's mind.
          7.   Harbinger's smacktalk (link 1 and 2).

 
       II) The Breath Scene :

          1.   London rubble.
          2.   Mako in the background.
          3.   Citadel explosion (link 1 and 2).


    III) The Dreams :
         
          1.   Dream sequences and post-beam sequence share the same game mechanics.
          2.   Reality-nonreality transition after beam shot (post-beam, dreams, Geth Consensus).
          3.   Oily shadows and whispering.
          4.   Nightmares are mentioned in the Arrival by subjects being indoctrinated.
          5.   Chambers and Asari having PTSD as comparison between PTSD & Shepard's dreams.


    IV) Leviathan :

          1.   Harbinger/the Reapers perfected enthrallment to indoctrination.
          2.   Enthrallment uses memories of its victim.
          3.   Similarities between Leviathan end and decision chamber.
          4.   Zap sound as a sign to enter/leave virtual reality (link 1 and 2).
          5.   Note the file name of the sixth murder that can be found in Bryson's lab.


     V) The Choices :

          1.   Shepard on his knees happened only during/after some mind control.
          2.   The Guardian is aligned to the Reapers.
          3.   Control and Synthesis being supported by indoctrinated characters.
          4.   A swap in the colours (TIM = ParagonAnderson = Renegade).
          5.   Huskification during Control/Synthesis vs. Shepard gaining strength while shooting the tubes.
          6.   Guardian losing it when you refuse ("SO BE IT!").
          7.   Decision chamber looks like a dialogue wheel from an aerial view.
          8.   Decision chamber resembling beam scenery (link 1 and 2).
          9.   Ambiguous end dialogue (Control/Synthesis).
        10.   Slide shows in Control/Synthesis/Destroy illustrate future possibilities, not facts that already happened.
        11.   Soldiers in Destroy fighting fiercely while in Control/Synthesis they are losing (note: no cheering in Synthesis).


    VI) The Kid :

         1.   Moves from one roof to another during an invasion (all links).
         2.   It can open a door that is marked as locked.
         3.   It survives a blast from a Reaper laser.
         4.   It is not seen by anyone else.
         5.   There always are warning symbols around it.
         6.   It disappears without making any noise.
         7.   It does not behave like a normal kid ("You cannot save me!").
         8.   The Guardian has the same form as the kid.


   VII) Anderson & TIM :

         1.   How did Anderson follow Shepard?
         2.   How can Anderson reach the control first?
         3.   Why did no one else follow Anderson?
         4.   From where did TIM shows up?
         5.   TIM's scars are only present at the end of the game.
         6.   Anderson may be addressing Shepard ("They are controlling you!").
         7.   Shepard is dominated by TIM and thus through him by the Reapers.
         8.   Anderson and Shepard have wounds at the same place (link 1 and 2).
         9.   Reaper horn played in the background (at 1/2 speed).


  VIII) The Guardian :

         1.   It has the same shape as the kid ( thus an extraction of Shepard's memories).
         2.   It speaks with femshep's and maleshep's voice.
         3.   Harbinger's line in the MP trailer (link 1 and 2).


    IX) The Beam Run :

        1.   Harbinger is pin-pointing everyone and everything but Shepard.
        2.   Harbinger does not destroy the Normandy.
        3.   Shepard survives a blast that should one-shot Makos and Gunships.
        4.   Harbinger just leaves.


     X) The Citadel :

        1.   The Citadel resembles events of the past.
        2.   You can find Coats dead on the Citadel.
        3.   The illumination without a specific source.




----------Epilogue----------

I
would again like to thank everyone that has contributed to this list
and if only a single person gains a broader perspective of The Indoctrination Theory
through this list, the porpuse of this undertaking has been fulfilled
and not in vain. This list may seem to be complete, but there are
certainly going to be new discoveries in the course of exploring new
content and I will try to adjust this list accordingly.


Version 1.0  (23.10.2012)




please.:innocent:

Modifié par masster blaster, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:07 .


#48477
TheWill

TheWill
  • Members
  • 242 messages
ther reapers seem to take the abilities of organics as a starting point and then they recreate the effect using technology instead.. i can only assume that the reapers possess an ability similar to the protheans..being able to read the genetic markers in your dna...

all that organic goo has all the knowledge and memories of everyone melted down... who knows if they exist in some way inside the reaper.. living in a virtual world inside them...

this would make all the.... were not killing them and were preserving them talk make sense... also the reapers being a nation crap would make sense as they would effectively be flying planets/homeworlds for all the organics inside them....

i often thought that the starchild scene at the end was an inside view of a reaper... it seems artificial... and yes i know its a game.. but the blue tint and the emptyness and view makes me think its artificial.. a virtual reality...

#48478
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

#48479
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages
That guy simply doesn't understand we're not saying Shepard was indoctrinated the whole time.

Shepard was in the process of being indoctrinated, the Reapers are slowly trying to influence Shepard. The dreams are meant to make Shepard feel guilty about the ones who died, so Shepard will not choose destroy in the end. Shepard isn't indoctrinated until (s)he makes the wrong choice in the end.

#48480
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

masster blaster wrote...

Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

Well... what did you expect? Those reaper cannons could cut through a dreadnought like butter.

#48481
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

Well... what did you expect? Those reaper cannons could cut through a dreadnought like butter.


Um Harbinger took on my whole fleet with easy. Althpugh he had NAzar with him. Nazar took out Hackett.:crying:

Oh and I destroyed only 1 Reaper capital ship.:D

Modifié par masster blaster, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:14 .


#48482
ThisOneIsPunny

ThisOneIsPunny
  • Members
  • 446 messages

EXMEFan wrote...

In order for Shepard to have been indoctrinated the whole time...


Lol kay.

Edit: Posted Image'd thankfully. Hello everyone, stopping in to see if anyone knows what the dlc today is, also goodbye everyone!

Modifié par ThisOneIsPunny, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:15 .


#48483
ElSuperGecko

ElSuperGecko
  • Members
  • 2 317 messages
Did anybody hear something? Like a plaintive, desperate plea for attention...?

No? Must just be me.

Edit:  Here's one for y'all:  Lord of the Rings Theory.

Destroy = Throwing the One Ring in Mount Doom.
Control = Claiming it's power for yourself.
Synthesis = Wearing it until you become a Ringwraith...

Modifié par ElSuperGecko, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:15 .


#48484
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

ElSuperGecko wrote...

Did anybody hear something? Like a plaintive, desperate plea for attention...?

No? Must just be me.

It is, yeah.

#48485
FifthBeatle

FifthBeatle
  • Members
  • 166 messages

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

That guy simply doesn't understand we're not saying Shepard was indoctrinated the whole time.

Shepard was in the process of being indoctrinated, the Reapers are slowly trying to influence Shepard. The dreams are meant to make Shepard feel guilty about the ones who died, so Shepard will not choose destroy in the end. Shepard isn't indoctrinated until (s)he makes the wrong choice in the end.

Plus, isn't it really the player who is being indoctrinated? The more the player (vis a vis Shepard) learns about indoctrination through digging deeper into the game by speaking with people (all the quotes you complied) and understanding the themes (Restirder's top-10 list) the more lilely the player will be able to break free of that final attempt. 

The dreams themselves are such a departure from reality that the player has to stop and question what they are about. 

#48486
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages

ThisOneIsPunny wrote...

EXMEFan wrote...

In order for Shepard to have been indoctrinated the whole time...


Lol kay.


Yeah, like I said, a few posts up.

He doesn't even understand that's not what IT claims at all.

#48487
DoomsdayDevice

DoomsdayDevice
  • Members
  • 2 357 messages

FifthBeatle wrote...

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

That guy simply doesn't understand we're not saying Shepard was indoctrinated the whole time.

Shepard was in the process of being indoctrinated, the Reapers are slowly trying to influence Shepard. The dreams are meant to make Shepard feel guilty about the ones who died, so Shepard will not choose destroy in the end. Shepard isn't indoctrinated until (s)he makes the wrong choice in the end.

Plus, isn't it really the player who is being indoctrinated? The more the player (vis a vis Shepard) learns about indoctrination through digging deeper into the game by speaking with people (all the quotes you complied) and understanding the themes (Restirder's top-10 list) the more lilely the player will be able to break free of that final attempt. 

The dreams themselves are such a departure from reality that the player has to stop and question what they are about. 


Correct!

It is the player (and thus Shepard) who ends up fully indoctrinated if he chooses to side with the Reapers.

People who don't pick destroy, do so because of not wanting to kill EDI & the Geth. That weakness, of wanting a solution in which nobody dies, is exactly what the Reapers are trying to exploit. (Also through the dreams, which are all about survivor guilt and dead squadmates / kiddies on Earth.)

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:18 .


#48488
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

Well... what did you expect? Those reaper cannons could cut through a dreadnought like butter.


Um Harbinger took on my whole fleet with easy. Althpugh he had NAzar with him. Nazar took out Hackett.:crying:

Oh and I destroyed only 1 Reaper capital ship.:D


I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

Also, if you're going to insist on always calling Sovereign by his real name, at least spell it right. It is Nazara. This has been bugging me forever.

#48489
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages
Oh and Leviathan is in the space battle now. um he took Harbinger down. Posted Image


Oh and Cerberus had their own NormandyPosted Image

Modifié par masster blaster, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:19 .


#48490
masster blaster

masster blaster
  • Members
  • 7 278 messages

byne wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

Well... what did you expect? Those reaper cannons could cut through a dreadnought like butter.


Um Harbinger took on my whole fleet with easy. Althpugh he had NAzar with him. Nazar took out Hackett.:crying:

Oh and I destroyed only 1 Reaper capital ship.:D


I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

Also, if you're going to insist on always calling Sovereign by his real name, at least spell it right. It is Nazara. This has been bugging me forever.


It's a mod for Star Wars Empire at War FOC mod byne. It's an ME mod.:D:):o

#48491
TheWill

TheWill
  • Members
  • 242 messages
the reapers try time and time again to capture shepard.. when fighting the collectors possesed by harbinger you hear this clearly.. also they dont want to destroy advanced civilization.. but harvest them... and again your of the opinion that we all think shepard was allways indoctrinated.. which is wrong...

you not only misunderstand the points made very clearly by everyone on here.. but you also show a complete lack of knowledge of the games story and events... perhaps you should take some time to chill... possibly take some time to actually read some of the posts by people and then play the game whit IT in mind.. and then see what you think...

because right now your coming across as a babbling fool.. maybe not you fault.. i know we were all a bit cheesed off at one point.. and made silly comments without taking time to think on them... so relax.. calm down take some time to think... and play with our ideas.... and then come back.... and im sure everyone would welcome you back ...even if you dont agree with any of us we all at least enjoy the discussion.. it passes the time while we wait... just as long as you dont come across as a raving lunatic spouting drivel and facts that arent facts.. you'll be fine...

Modifié par TheWill, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:25 .


#48492
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages
Did the DLC they talked about yesterday come out yet?

#48493
SixG90

SixG90
  • Members
  • 136 messages

byne wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

estebanus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Estebauns. Harbinger blow up the Normandy in one shot. I....I.... oh my the Alliance is powerless to stop the Reapers in the space battle.

Well... what did you expect? Those reaper cannons could cut through a dreadnought like butter.


Um Harbinger took on my whole fleet with easy. Althpugh he had NAzar with him. Nazar took out Hackett.:crying:

Oh and I destroyed only 1 Reaper capital ship.:D


I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

Also, if you're going to insist on always calling Sovereign by his real name, at least spell it right. It is Nazara. This has been bugging me forever.


+1 

#48494
The Heretic of Time

The Heretic of Time
  • Members
  • 5 612 messages

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

Correct!

It is the player (and thus Shepard) who ends up fully indoctrinated if he chooses to side with the Reapers.


Which would be amazing storytelling if we actually saw the true consequences of it, the game telling us: "Yo dawg, you're indoctrinated, GAME OVER!"

However, the game doesn't do that, and with the EC the endings only got even brighter and happier. All 3 original endings are pretty much sunshine and rainbows now after the EC. We don't get anything after that. No screen telling us "Yo dawg, you have been fooled! This is no the true ending, you're indoctrinated! Please try again!"

If the IT is true, it means the story as it is right now lacks a proper resolution. It means the story we got is crippled and incomplete. This fact alone makes it highly unlikely that the IT is even remotely true.

#48495
SixG90

SixG90
  • Members
  • 136 messages

byne wrote...

Did the DLC they talked about yesterday come out yet?


Probably not, they usually come out at 6 pm at my place (GMT+1)

EDIT: unless it's another weapons pack... Groundside Resistence I think the translation would be....

Modifié par mrs.N7, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:25 .


#48496
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

DoomsdayDevice wrote...

Correct!

It is the player (and thus Shepard) who ends up fully indoctrinated if he chooses to side with the Reapers.


Which would be amazing storytelling if we actually saw the true consequences of it, the game telling us: "Yo dawg, you're indoctrinated, GAME OVER!"

However, the game doesn't do that, and with the EC the endings only got even brighter and happier. All 3 original endings are pretty much sunshine and rainbows now after the EC. We don't get anything after that. No screen telling us "Yo dawg, you have been fooled! This is no the true ending, you're indoctrinated! Please try again!"

If the IT is true, it means the story as it is right now lacks a proper resolution. It means the story we got is crippled and incomplete. This fact alone makes it highly unlikely that the IT is even remotely true.

Except if intended as an interpretation not to be expanded upon.

#48497
CmdrShep80

CmdrShep80
  • Members
  • 1 900 messages

ElSuperGecko wrote...

Did anybody hear something? Like a plaintive, desperate plea for attention...?

No? Must just be me.

Edit:  Here's one for y'all:  Lord of the Rings Theory.

Destroy = Throwing the One Ring in Mount Doom.
Control = Claiming it's power for yourself.
Synthesis = Wearing it until you become a Ringwraith...


Listen to yourself!  You're...indoctrinated!

either that or you're hearing voices lol

Couldnt help it :ph34r:

#48498
estebanus

estebanus
  • Members
  • 5 987 messages

mrs.N7 wrote...

byne wrote...

Did the DLC they talked about yesterday come out yet?


Probably not, they usually come out at 6 pm at my place (GMT+1)

What DLC? I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused here.

#48499
ElSuperGecko

ElSuperGecko
  • Members
  • 2 317 messages

Heretic_Hanar wrote...
Which would be amazing storytelling if we actually saw the true consequences of it, the game telling us: "Yo dawg, you're indoctrinated, GAME OVER!"

However, the game doesn't do that, and with the EC the endings only got even brighter and happier. All 3 original endings are pretty much sunshine and rainbows now after the EC. We don't get anything after that. No screen telling us "Yo dawg, you have been fooled! This is no the true ending, you're indoctrinated! Please try again!"

If the IT is true, it means the story as it is right now lacks a proper resolution. It means the story we got is crippled and incomplete. This fact alone makes it highly unlikely that the IT is even remotely true.


That's kind of the point however Hanar.  If we saw the consequences immediately after we made the decision, the reveal as you put it straight away, there would be no controversy, no debat, no wondering and certainly no speculation.  We'd all KNOW it was a trick, for definite.  So much better to draw it out, and leave people guessing.  It's essentially like ending a TV series with a cliffhanger.

Bioware have DLC to sell.  They have hype to generate for ME4.  They are deliberately leaving us with an open ending so we can speculate and theorise.  People will buy the DLC and look forward to ME4, hoping for, maybe even expecting answers.

Until we have every piece of the DLC for ME3 and have the full picture, and until we know where Bioware plans to go with ME4, the debate is open.

EDIT:  Tawp.

Modifié par ElSuperGecko, 20 novembre 2012 - 04:28 .


#48500
byne

byne
  • Members
  • 7 813 messages

estebanus wrote...

mrs.N7 wrote...

byne wrote...

Did the DLC they talked about yesterday come out yet?


Probably not, they usually come out at 6 pm at my place (GMT+1)

What DLC? I'm sorry, I'm a bit confused here.


The one mentioned in this tweet.