80611 réponses à ce sujet

[GethPrimeMKII]

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

And Unicorn all you have is opions and so do we. Untill Bioware says other wise then we are still here. If you want us gone go ask Bioware, and I will do the same for the Literalist.

Enof said.

I want to speculate not argue.

The only reason why I think you are here, is because you just dis like IT. If you wish IT were true that's all you had to say I wish IT could be true, but I just don't see it.

What? No, I'm here because I don't believe in the IT and wish to discuss why. Now go read my posts.

I'm curious what your opinions of the face value endings are. Did you like them or dislike them?

[Dwailing]

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

And Unicorn all you have is opions and so do we. Untill Bioware says other wise then we are still here. If you want us gone go ask Bioware, and I will do the same for the Literalist.

Enof said.

I want to speculate not argue.

The only reason why I think you are here, is because you just dis like IT. If you wish IT were true that's all you had to say I wish IT could be true, but I just don't see it.

What? No, I'm here because I don't believe in the IT and wish to discuss why. Now go read my posts.

Who said he didn't read your posts?  He probably already read your posts, and this is his response to them.  Thing is, you keep acting like the other ITists who were here when you were didn't read your posts, when to be honest, they probably did, and yet you keep acting like there's some deeper meaning that to them that we can't grasp because we don't agree one hundred percent with you.

[I_eat_unicorns]

masster blaster wrote...

And you want to know why you don't like IT, or you want to know why IT people?

spek engrish prz

[Home run MF]

I_eat_unicorns wrote...


Keep in mind that I'm arguing why it's impossible to apply the IT to the series at this point. Some IT supporters may get mad and then go back to the "evidence" of the IT, then tell me I lose credibilty if I can't prove them wrong. It would never work that way as it's not worth going into every single detail and arguing back and forth over it when IT supporters at this point are delusional and will dismiss every claim to contrary to what they want to believe. 

I_eat_unicorns wrote...



What? No, I'm here because I don't believe in the IT and wish to discuss why. Now go read my posts.

I don't think you know what discuss means.

Modifié par Home run MF, 05 août 2012 - 02:56 .

[I_eat_unicorns]

Dwailing wrote...

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

And Unicorn all you have is opions and so do we. Untill Bioware says other wise then we are still here. If you want us gone go ask Bioware, and I will do the same for the Literalist.

Enof said.

I want to speculate not argue.

The only reason why I think you are here, is because you just dis like IT. If you wish IT were true that's all you had to say I wish IT could be true, but I just don't see it.

What? No, I'm here because I don't believe in the IT and wish to discuss why. Now go read my posts.

Who said he didn't read your posts?  He probably already read your posts, and this is his response to them.  Thing is, you keep acting like the other ITists who were here when you were didn't read your posts, when to be honest, they probably did, and yet you keep acting like there's some deeper meaning that to them that we can't grasp because we don't agree one hundred percent with you.

If he read my posts, he wouldn't repsond the way he did. He and other IT supporters would actually form a constructive argument against my points rather than dismiss and ask "why u here?". Every It supporter at this point is in denial, the fact that they dismiss my posts and tell me "I've wrote nothing" shows they didn't read what I wrote, or they refuse to acknowledge anything that goes against their beliefs. 

[I_eat_unicorns]

Home run MF wrote...

I_eat_unicorns wrote...


Keep in mind that I'm arguing why it's impossible to apply the IT to the series at this point. Some IT supporters may get mad and then go back to the "evidence" of the IT, then tell me I lose credibilty if I can't prove them wrong. It would never work that way as it's not worth going into every single detail and arguing back and forth over it when IT supporters at this point are delusional and will dismiss every claim to contrary to what they want to believe. 

I_eat_unicorns wrote...



What? No, I'm here because I don't believe in the IT and wish to discuss why. Now go read my posts.

I don't think you know what discuss means.

For some reason people in this thread won't read what I write, they just dismiss everything that goes against his/her beliefs. 

Modifié par I_eat_unicorns, 05 août 2012 - 02:59 .

[masster blaster]

So you would rather have all of the galaxy submit to synthesis, whenit is forced. Or do you want Shepard to dictate what will be in his/her intrest on the way he/she sees the galaxy.

Or maybe you want to say f you to the Catalyst and kill everyone you tried to save.

Destroy is the best because it was the main point of the whole ME trilogy and it's the only one where Shepard lives. Not some AI, but real life Shepard.Can you explain the Breath scene. Why Harbinger did not just kill Shepard and blow up the Normandy, right qhen Shepard calles in the Normandy. And why Coats is an the Citadel, and Bioware made it clear that there was a body there, because the camera pans out in the same spot. Where Coats was at.

Also Shepard makes a weird sound when Anderson says Shepard. Can you explain why Shepard does not git up when Shepard regains his/herself in the place where you meet the Catalyst and Why the Catalyst has to say wake up to Shepard, in order to get Shepard right back up.

And can you explain why why Control has four handles instead of two.

Call it bad writing all you want, but if that is your excuese for everything that we provide you then we can't help you.

[TJBartlemus]

masster blaster wrote...

Hey we are not going to do that TJ. We have to be more civilized than that. If you act on your emotions then it will get you into trouble, but sometimes it what makes us human.

You think that is me angry? No that is frustrated. You have yet to see me angry. The reason I'm frustrated is cause he continues to ignore my posts. Since he does that he either can't argue against my points and/or he is purely trolling. 

[Schachmatt123]

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

How have my arguemnts been discussed in detail? what are my arguements? How does the ec dlc put in favor of the IT? How do you know if you're just deluding yourself that it does by hoping you would see the It in the ec dlc, and taking every hint you can make out of it, when it could have not been the intention? How do you know I don't know  the details of the IT?  Why don't I use evidence and details to debunk it?

Read my post and re-read if you have to, because you clearly didn't, otherwise, you wouldn't type what you just wrote. And don't dismiss anything. 

How many of my aguments have been discussed? - All of them.
What are my arguments? - Read your own post, there are right there.
How does the ec dlc put in favor of the IT? - Read this thread and the other threads about IT.
How do you know if you're just deluding yourself ... - Because I know it.
How do you know I don't know  the details of the IT? - If you would know them, you woudn't write this nonsense.
Why don't I use evidence and details to debunk it? - Because you don't? - Silly question.

Modifié par Schachmatt, 05 août 2012 - 03:01 .

[masster blaster]

So what do you think will happen in the Leviathan dlc, when Shepard meets the Leviathan face to face?

[TJBartlemus]

I_eat_unicorns wrote...

For some reason people in this thread won't read what I write, they just dismiss everything that goes against his/her beliefs. 

WTF? I read your posts and responded to them yet you insist on ignoring them. You complain no one answers you yet I have. WTF? Sir please stop trolling and be reasonable. Otherwise it's not going to be pleasant for you in the long run.
 

[munnellyladt]

TJBartlemus wrote...

masster blaster wrote...

Hey we are not going to do that TJ. We have to be more civilized than that. If you act on your emotions then it will get you into trouble, but sometimes it what makes us human.

You think that is me angry? No that is frustrated. You have yet to see me angry. The reason I'm frustrated is cause he continues to ignore my posts. Since he does that he either can't argue against my points and/or he is purely trolling. 

Then don't feed it.

[masster blaster]

I am not going to call him names munny because I don't think that solves the problem. And yes we can but he wants answers and if he wants them he will get them.

[munnellyladt]

masster blaster wrote...

So what do you think will happen in the Leviathan dlc, when Shepard meets the Leviathan face to face?

The usual,Shep fights reapers,reaper tries to kill shep,shep defeats reaper,maybe tries to convince reaper to fight with him(because shep is so charismatic)

[masster blaster]

Okay everyone just pm him because I don't want. Byne or anyone else come back to a locked thread, so please let's take this else where. Okay because I want to SPECULATE.

[I_eat_unicorns]

masster blaster wrote...

So you would rather have all of the galaxy submit to synthesis, whenit is forced. Or do you want Shepard to dictate what will be in his/her intrest on the way he/she sees the galaxy.

Or maybe you want to say f you to the Catalyst and kill everyone you tried to save.

Destroy is the best because it was the main point of the whole ME trilogy and it's the only one where Shepard lives. Not some AI, but real life Shepard.Can you explain the Breath scene. Why Harbinger did not just kill Shepard and blow up the Normandy, right qhen Shepard calles in the Normandy. And why Coats is an the Citadel, and Bioware made it clear that there was a body there, because the camera pans out in the same spot. Where Coats was at.

Also Shepard makes a weird sound when Anderson says Shepard. Can you explain why Shepard does not git up when Shepard regains his/herself in the place where you meet the Catalyst and Why the Catalyst has to say wake up to Shepard, in order to get Shepard right back up.

And can you explain why why Control has four handles instead of two.

Call it bad writing all you want, but if that is your excuese for everything that we provide you then we can't help you.

I can't understand a word you're saying. I'll try my best to make out your poor typing skills. You believe destroy is the best, but the whole point of the trilogy was ending the reaper threat. That doesn't necessarily mean control is bad, you basically become a god, either a caretaker of a galaxy (paragon shepard) or a powerful leader (renegade shepard). 

Synthesis is a bad ending, yes, but that was the point of the ec dlc. The original endings were really poor, and believing in the IT is pretending it was more than poor writing, when it wasn't. It was really bad. And I explain in my post of why IT won't work, in fact it would have made the endings worse, as they render player choice useless. 

I don't get the shepard/anderson thing, fix your typing. 


What does the control handle number have to do with anything? Where are the extra handles?

I think you're just too hurt over the original endings, and you can't accept them. Read my post, if it's too complicated for you to understand, then don't bother insulting me or relpying back at all.

[StElmo]

Chris Priestly:

I answered this. There will be no more new endings. I used the "quotes"
as we consider the Extended Cut the ending, the finale, the stop
whatever you want to call it of the ending of Mass Effect 3. We do not
plan to make new endings, give more closure to the endings, adding or
subtracting to or from the endings, etc. We are done with the endings.

That said, we are working on some very cool downloadable story based
single player content. In these DLCs there will certainly be elements
that will effect the end of the game. As Mike Gamble already said,
depending on what you do in Leviathan there will be new dialog with the
Catalyst at the end of the game. These sorts of elements are definitely
possible for future DLC as well.

And for all those stating "Well if you don't X I am not going to buy
another game/DLC/etc from BioWare again". I'm sorry you feel thht way,
but I understand it. That is your ability as a consumer. If a company
(us, a burger joint, a shoe store, etc) does not live up to your
expectations, you go elsewhere. I get it and I do the same thing. I do
not fault anyone for feeling this way. Hopefully, the DLC we come up
with or a future BioWare title will make you want to give us another
try.

However, if you don't like it, feel free to leave. I'm sorry we have
disappointed you and as I said, we'll try to make better content or
games in the future that you will hopefully enjoy. No one if forced to
be here. You don't like it, feel free to take your business elsewhere
and stop trying to ruin the funn and enjoyment for those people who do
enjoy ME3 and the DLC.

Done now.

Just thought this should be reiterated, if you want to believe in IT you have to know that you will never get to "wake up" and it is only ever going to be a theory.

[byne]

TJBartlemus wrote...

You think that is me angry? No that is frustrated. You have yet to see me angry. The reason I'm frustrated is cause he continues to ignore my posts. Since he does that he either can't argue against my points and/or he is purely trolling. 

He's purely trolling. He looked at this quote and told us we were delusional for claiming Chris contradicted himself:

Chris Priestly wrote...

 I answered this. There will be no more new endings. I used the "quotes" as we consider the Extended Cut the ending, the finale, the stop whatever you want to call it of the ending of Mass Effect 3. We do not plan to make new endings, give more closure to the endings, adding or subtracting to or from the endings, etc. We are done with the endings.

That said, we are working on some very cool downloadable story based single player content. In these DLCs there will certainly be elements that will effect the end of the game. As Mike Gamble already said, depending on what you do in Leviathan there will be new dialog with the Catalyst at the end of the game. These sorts of elements are definitely possible for future DLC as well.

If he really sees no contradiction there, he's either dense or just ignoring things so he can continue to troll, and based on his writing ability, he doesnt seem dense.

Just ignore him and he'll leave.

Dont bother replying to this, I_eat_unicorns, as you may remember from yesterday, I am no longer responding to what you say.

[Dam0299]

masster blaster wrote...

So what do you think will happen in the Leviathan dlc, when Shepard meets the Leviathan face to face?

I highly doubt that the Leviathan will be a benevolent being. If one speaks to Balak during a mission on the Citadel, he will say that the Leviathan of dis (assuming it is the same reaper they are talking about) turned out to be a inactive reaper that indoctrinated most of the batarians who were working on it. They in turn disabled most of the batarians security systems on their planet.

HOWEVER, I remember reading a while ago it was supposed to have been disabled for killing one of its own kind. I think he/it will be more of a enemy of my enemy, Rather then a friend.

[masster blaster]

And Shepard gets to have a Reaper as a friend yea that's going to end well. But I do think Leviathan has plans for Shepard, but Shepard is not going to like them.

[masster blaster]

Byne permission to go Masster blaster on him?

[byne]

masster blaster wrote...

Byne permission to go Masster blaster on him?

I dont even know what that means, but no.

[Home run MF]

Who said Leviathan is a Reaper?

[masster blaster]

Was talking about speaking nonsense to unicorn so he can get a head ack and leave.

[I_eat_unicorns]

byne wrote...

TJBartlemus wrote...

You think that is me angry? No that is frustrated. You have yet to see me angry. The reason I'm frustrated is cause he continues to ignore my posts. Since he does that he either can't argue against my points and/or he is purely trolling. 

He's purely trolling. He looked at this quote and told us we were delusional for claiming Chris contradicted himself:

Chris Priestly wrote...

 I answered this. There will be no more new endings. I used the "quotes" as we consider the Extended Cut the ending, the finale, the stop whatever you want to call it of the ending of Mass Effect 3. We do not plan to make new endings, give more closure to the endings, adding or subtracting to or from the endings, etc. We are done with the endings.

That said, we are working on some very cool downloadable story based single player content. In these DLCs there will certainly be elements that will effect the end of the game. As Mike Gamble already said, depending on what you do in Leviathan there will be new dialog with the Catalyst at the end of the game. These sorts of elements are definitely possible for future DLC as well.

If he really sees no contradiction there, he's either dense or just ignoring things so he can continue to troll, and based on his writing ability, he doesnt seem dense.

Just ignore him and he'll leave.

Dont bother replying to this, I_eat_unicorns, as you may remember from yesterday, I am no longer responding to what you say.

It's a discussion forum. If you're going to have someone come in and go against your opinion, and not be able to defend yourself, why bother posting in the first place?

And you're taking his words in a deluded way. The endings won't be worked on, but things from future dlc may affect them. At best, this probably means a few new dialogue lines and new slides. That's probably it. Not IT.