Raistlin Majare 1992 wrote...
EXMEFan wrote...
It introduces a lot of plot holes, and further kills the interest of the series.
I doubt you could mention even one plothole created by the theory.
At what point was he indoctrinated? Why did they try to kill him 100 times if they indoctrinated him or planned to use him. Why if Illusive man was indoctrinated and acting bizzare, Shepard was calm and composed.
How could they have known what the crucible would do when it wasn't built by them? Why was the indoctrination so timely, so precise, and fitting for a random event nobody, even the Reapers, knew would happen?
Also, why would the Reapers want to use the crucible when it destroyed all the relays so they are basically stuck in the SOL system with everybody else.
Why wouldn't they just indoctrinate Shepard to not build the crucible in the first place. If they planned on indoctrinating Shepard, why did they kill him at the beginning of ME2?
If your Shepard wanted to control the Reapers anyways, because you can basically agree with Illusive Man at points and at the end of ME2, why would he need to be indoctrinated? I mean you can play as a Renegade or a Paragon anyways. Your Shepard was never a static character that needed to be swayed.
Also why did you promise our decisions matter if you are now telling me my character made the decision because of indoctrination.
Also why introduce indoctrination when it would only matter if I didn't pick destroy.....If I picked destroy, what is the reason to make me buy DLC just to find out something was happening that didn't matter with my character.